Cheung Chui Ming Gemmy, Laude Augustinus, Wong Wanling, Mathur Ranjana, Chan Choi Mun, Wong Edmund, Wong Doric, Wong Tien Yin, Lim Tock Han
*Medical Retina Service, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore, Singapore; †Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore; ‡Department of Ophthalmology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore; §Academic Clinical Program in Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, Singapore, Singapore; and ¶National Healthcare Group Eye Institute, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Retina. 2015 Jul;35(7):1375-80. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000482.
To evaluate the performance of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) diagnosis using fundus camera-based indocyanine green angiography, comparing a single sign of "subretinal focal hyperfluorescence" on indocyanine green angiography with a modification of the EVEREST criteria.
Color fundus photograph, flash fundus camera-based fluorescein angiography, and indocyanine green angiography of 241 eyes of 230 consecutive patients with exudative maculopathy due to PCV or typical age-related macular degeneration were graded independently by 2 retinal specialists using a modified EVEREST criteria, which requires the presence of subretinal focal hyperfluorescence plus any 1 of 5 additional criteria. Discordant cases were adjudicated by a senior retinal specialist to arrive at the final diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating curve of subretinal focal hyperfluorescence versus the EVEREST criteria and combinations of individual EVEREST criteria were compared.
Among the 241 eyes with exudative maculopathy, 131 eyes had PCV and 110 eyes had typical age-related macular degeneration. Using a single sign of subretinal focal hyperfluorescence alone for the diagnosis of PCV, sensitivity was 85.3% and specificity was 80.9%, with an area under the receiver operating curve of 83.1%. When applying the EVEREST definition, sensitivity was reduced to 78.4% but specificity improved to 87.1% with a similar area under the receiver operating curve of 82.8%. The frequency of individual criteria was highly variable, with stereo nodular appearance (73.7%) and orange nodule (55.0%) being the most common and branching vascular network, massive hemorrhage, and hypofluorescent halo in the presence of subretinal focal hyperfluorescence being less common (21.5%-28.1%).
The EVEREST criteria have a higher specificity for the diagnosis of PCV than subretinal focal hyperfluorescence alone and may be applied to flash fundus camera-based indocyanine green angiography in a clinical setting. Stereo nodular appearance is the most important additional criterion.
使用基于眼底相机的吲哚青绿血管造影术评估息肉状脉络膜血管病变(PCV)的诊断性能,将吲哚青绿血管造影术中“视网膜下局灶性高荧光”这一单一征象与改良的珠穆朗玛峰标准进行比较。
230例因PCV或典型年龄相关性黄斑变性导致渗出性黄斑病变的连续患者的241只眼的彩色眼底照片、基于闪光眼底相机的荧光素血管造影和吲哚青绿血管造影,由2名视网膜专科医生使用改良的珠穆朗玛峰标准进行独立分级,该标准要求存在视网膜下局灶性高荧光以及5项附加标准中的任何1项。不一致的病例由一位资深视网膜专科医生进行裁决以得出最终诊断。比较视网膜下局灶性高荧光与珠穆朗玛峰标准以及各个珠穆朗玛峰标准组合的敏感性、特异性和受试者操作特征曲线下面积。
在241只渗出性黄斑病变眼中,131只眼患有PCV,110只眼患有典型年龄相关性黄斑变性。仅使用视网膜下局灶性高荧光这一单一征象诊断PCV时,敏感性为85.3%,特异性为80.9%,受试者操作特征曲线下面积为83.1%。应用珠穆朗玛峰标准时,敏感性降至78.4%,但特异性提高到87.1%,受试者操作特征曲线下面积相似,为82.8%。各个标准的出现频率差异很大,立体结节状外观(73.7%)和橙色结节(55.0%)最为常见,而在存在视网膜下局灶性高荧光时分支血管网、大量出血和低荧光晕则较少见(21.5%-28.1%)。
珠穆朗玛峰标准对PCV诊断的特异性高于单独的视网膜下局灶性高荧光,可应用于临床环境中基于闪光眼底相机的吲哚青绿血管造影术。立体结节状外观是最重要的附加标准。