Sarkar Urmimala, Simchowitz Brett, Bonacum Doug, Strull William, Lopez Andrea, Rotteau Leahora, Shojania Kaveh G
Center for Vulnerable Populations, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2014 Oct;40(10):461-1. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40059-x.
Delayed and missed diagnoses lead to significant patient harm. Because physician actions are fundamental to the outpatient diagnostic process, a study was conducted to explore physician perspectives on diagnosis.
As part of a quality improvement initiative, an integrated health system conducted six physician focus groups in 2004 and 2005. The focus groups included questions about the process of diagnosis, specific factors contributing to missed diagnosis, use of guidelines, atypical vs. typical presentations of disease, diagnostic tools, and follow-up, all with regard to delays in the diagnostic process. The interviews were analyzed (1) deductively, with application of the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model, which addresses systems design, quality management, job design, and technology implementations that affect safety-related patient and organizational and/or staff outcomes, and (2) inductively, with identification of novel themes using content analysis.
A total of 25 physicians participated in the six focus groups, which yielded 12 hours of discussion. Providers identified multiple barriers to timely and accurate diagnosis, including organizational culture, information availability, and communication factors.
Multiple themes relating to each of the participants in the diagnostic process-health system, provider, and patient-emerged. Concerns about health system structure and providers' interactions with one another and with patients far exceeded discussion of the cognitive factors that might affect the diagnostic process. The results suggest that, at least in physicians' views, improving the diagnostic process requires attention to the organization of the health system in addition to the cognitive aspects of diagnosis.
诊断延迟和漏诊会给患者带来严重伤害。由于医生的行为是门诊诊断过程的基础,因此开展了一项研究以探讨医生对诊断的看法。
作为质量改进计划的一部分,一个综合医疗系统在2004年和2005年组织了六次医生焦点小组讨论。焦点小组讨论的问题包括诊断过程、导致漏诊的具体因素、指南的使用、疾病的非典型与典型表现、诊断工具以及随访,所有这些都涉及诊断过程中的延迟。对访谈进行了分析:(1)采用演绎法,应用患者安全系统工程倡议(SEIPS)模型,该模型涉及影响与患者安全相关的患者、组织和/或员工结果的系统设计、质量管理、工作设计和技术实施;(2)采用归纳法,通过内容分析确定新出现的主题。
共有25名医生参加了这六次焦点小组讨论,讨论时长共计12小时。提供者们确定了及时准确诊断的多个障碍,包括组织文化、信息可获取性和沟通因素。
出现了与诊断过程中的每个参与者(医疗系统、提供者和患者)相关的多个主题。对医疗系统结构以及提供者之间及其与患者之间互动的关注远远超过了对可能影响诊断过程的认知因素的讨论。结果表明,至少在医生看来,改善诊断过程除了关注诊断的认知方面外,还需要关注医疗系统的组织。