Cunnings Ian, Patterson Clare, Felser Claudia
School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading Reading, UK.
Potsdam Research Institute for Multilingualism, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 23;6:840. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00840. eCollection 2015.
A number of recent studies have investigated how syntactic and non-syntactic constraints combine to cue memory retrieval during anaphora resolution. In this paper we investigate how syntactic constraints and gender congruence interact to guide memory retrieval during the resolution of subject pronouns. Subject pronouns are always technically ambiguous, and the application of syntactic constraints on their interpretation depends on properties of the antecedent that is to be retrieved. While pronouns can freely corefer with non-quantified referential antecedents, linking a pronoun to a quantified antecedent is only possible in certain syntactic configurations via variable binding. We report the results from a judgment task and three online reading comprehension experiments investigating pronoun resolution with quantified and non-quantified antecedents. Results from both the judgment task and participants' eye movements during reading indicate that comprehenders freely allow pronouns to corefer with non-quantified antecedents, but that retrieval of quantified antecedents is restricted to specific syntactic environments. We interpret our findings as indicating that syntactic constraints constitute highly weighted cues to memory retrieval during anaphora resolution.
最近有多项研究探讨了句法和非句法限制如何在指代消解过程中共同提示记忆检索。在本文中,我们研究了句法限制和性别一致性如何在主语代词消解过程中相互作用以引导记忆检索。主语代词在技术上总是具有歧义性,并且对其解释施加句法限制取决于要检索的先行词的属性。虽然代词可以自由地与非量化的指称先行词共指,但只有在通过变量绑定的某些句法结构中,代词才能与量化先行词建立联系。我们报告了一项判断任务和三项在线阅读理解实验的结果,这些实验研究了带有量化和非量化先行词的代词消解。判断任务和阅读过程中参与者的眼动结果均表明,理解者自由地允许代词与非量化先行词共指,但量化先行词的检索仅限于特定的句法环境。我们将研究结果解释为表明句法限制在指代消解过程中构成了对记忆检索的高度加权提示。