Simons Jeffrey S, Wills Thomas A, Emery Noah N, Marks Russell M
University of South Dakota, United States.
University of Hawaii Cancer Center, United States.
Addict Behav. 2015 Nov;50:205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.06.042. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Research on alcohol use depends heavily on the validity of self-reported drinking. The present paper presents data from 647 days of self-monitoring with a transdermal alcohol sensor by 60 young adults. We utilized a biochemical measure, transdermal alcohol assessment with the WrisTAS, to examine the convergent validity of three approaches to collecting daily self-report drinking data: experience sampling, daily morning reports of the previous night, and 1-week timeline follow-back (TLFB) assessments. We tested associations between three pharmacokinetic indices (peak concentration, area under the curve (AUC), and time to reach peak concentration) derived from the transdermal alcohol signal and within- and between- person variation in alcohol dependence symptoms. The WrisTAS data corroborated 85.74% of self-reported drinking days based on the experience sampling data. The TLFB assessment and combined experience sampling and morning reports agreed on 87.27% of drinking days. Drinks per drinking day did not vary as a function of wearing or not wearing the sensor; this indicates that participants provided consistent reports of their drinking regardless of biochemical verification. In respect to self-reported alcohol dependence symptoms, the AUC of the WrisTAS alcohol signal was associated with dependence symptoms at both the within- and between- person level. Furthermore, alcohol dependence symptoms at baseline predicted drinking episodes characterized in biochemical data by both higher peak alcohol concentration and faster time to reach peak concentration. The results support the validity of self-report alcohol data, provide empirical data useful for optimal design of daily process sampling, and provide an initial demonstration of the use of transdermal alcohol assessment to characterize drinking dynamics associated with risk for alcohol dependence.
对酒精使用情况的研究在很大程度上依赖于自我报告饮酒情况的有效性。本文展示了60名年轻成年人使用经皮酒精传感器进行647天自我监测的数据。我们采用了一种生化测量方法,即使用腕部酒精监测仪(WrisTAS)进行经皮酒精评估,以检验收集每日自我报告饮酒数据的三种方法的收敛效度:经验抽样法、前一晚的每日晨间报告法以及1周时间线追溯(TLFB)评估法。我们测试了从经皮酒精信号得出的三个药代动力学指标(峰值浓度、曲线下面积(AUC)以及达到峰值浓度的时间)与酒精依赖症状的个体内和个体间差异之间的关联。基于经验抽样数据,WrisTAS数据证实了85.74%的自我报告饮酒天数。TLFB评估以及经验抽样与晨间报告相结合的方法在87.27%的饮酒天数上达成一致。每日饮酒量并不因是否佩戴传感器而有所不同;这表明无论有无生化验证,参与者对自己饮酒情况的报告都是一致的。关于自我报告的酒精依赖症状,WrisTAS酒精信号的AUC在个体内和个体间水平上均与依赖症状相关。此外,基线时的酒精依赖症状预测了生化数据中以更高的酒精峰值浓度和更快达到峰值浓度为特征的饮酒发作情况。研究结果支持了自我报告酒精数据的有效性,提供了有助于每日过程抽样优化设计的实证数据,并初步证明了使用经皮酒精评估来描述与酒精依赖风险相关的饮酒动态情况。