School of Health Sciences, Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
Postgraduate student, School of Health Sciences, Centre for Health Sciences Research, University of Salford, Manchester, UK.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Jul 9;8:28. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0083-8. eCollection 2015.
Hyperkeratosis of foot skin is a common skin problem affecting people of different ages. The clinical presentation of this condition can range from dry flaky skin, which can lead to fissures, to hard callused skin which is often painful and debilitating. The purpose of this study was to test the reliability of certain non-invasive skin measurement devices on foot skin in normal and hyperkeratotic states, with a view to confirming their use as quantitative outcome measures in future clinical trials.
Twelve healthy adult participants with a range of foot skin conditions (xerotic skin, heel fissures and plantar calluses) were recruited to the study. Measurements of normal and hyperkeratotic skin sites were taken using the following devices: Corneometer® CM 825, Cutometer® 580 MPA, Reviscometer® RVM 600, Visioline® VL 650 Quantiride® and Visioscan® VC 98, by two investigators on two consecutive days. The intra and inter rater reliability and standard error of measurement for each device was calculated.
The data revealed the majority of the devices to be reliable measurement tools for normal and hyperkeratotic foot skin (ICC values > 0.6). The surface evaluation parameters for skin: SEsc and SEsm have greater reliability compared to the SEr measure. The Cutometer® is sensitive to soft tissue movement within the probe, therefore measurement of plantar soft tissue areas should be approached with caution. Reviscometer® measures on callused skin demonstrated an unusually high degree of error.
These results confirm the intra and inter rater reliability of the Corneometer®, Cutometer®, Visioline® and Visioscan® in quantifying specific foot skin biophysical properties.
足部皮肤过度角化是一种常见的皮肤问题,影响着不同年龄段的人群。这种情况的临床表现范围从干燥片状皮肤,可能导致裂缝,到坚硬的胼胝,这通常是痛苦和虚弱的。本研究的目的是测试某些非侵入性皮肤测量设备在正常和过度角化状态下对足部皮肤的可靠性,以期确认它们作为未来临床试验的定量结果测量指标的使用。
招募了 12 名具有不同足部皮肤状况(干燥皮肤、脚跟裂缝和足底胼胝)的健康成年参与者参加研究。使用以下设备对正常和过度角化皮肤部位进行测量:Corneometer®CM825、Cutometer®580MPA、Reviscometer®RVM600、Visioline®VL650Quantiride®和Visioscan®VC98,由两名研究人员在两天内进行两次测量。计算了每种设备的内部和外部可靠性以及测量误差的标准误差。
数据显示,大多数设备是正常和过度角化足部皮肤的可靠测量工具(ICC 值>0.6)。皮肤的表面评估参数:SEsc 和 SEsm 比 SEr 测量值具有更高的可靠性。Cutometer®对探头内软组织的运动很敏感,因此应谨慎测量足底软组织区域。Reviscometer®在胼胝皮肤上的测量结果显示出异常高的误差。
这些结果证实了 Corneometer®、Cutometer®、Visioline®和Visioscan®在量化特定足部皮肤生物物理特性方面的内部和外部可靠性。