Dimassi Kaouther, Douik Fatma, Ajroudi Mariem, Triki Amel, Gara Mohamed Faouzi
Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunisia; Faculté de Médecine, Université de Tunis El Manar, Tunis, Tunisia.
Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, Mongi Slim Hospital, La Marsa, Tunisia.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2015 Oct;41(10):2562-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.05.020. Epub 2015 Jul 9.
The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of sonographic estimation of fetal weight when performed at due date by first-line sonographers. This was a prospective study including 500 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound examinations were performed by residents on delivery day. Estimated fetal weights (EFWs) were calculated and compared with the corresponding birth weights. The median absolute difference between EFW and birth weight was 200 g (100-330). This difference was within ±10% in 75.2% of the cases. The median absolute percentage error was 5.53% (2.70%-10.03%). Linear regression analysis revealed a good correlation between EFW and birth weight (r = 0.79, p < 0.0001). According to Bland-Altman analysis, bias was -85.06 g (95% limits of agreement: -663.33 to 494.21). In conclusion, EFWs calculated by residents were as accurate as those calculated by experienced sonographers. Nevertheless, predictive performance remains limited, with a low sensitivity in the diagnosis of macrosomia.
本研究的主要目的是评估一线超声检查人员在预产期进行超声估计胎儿体重的准确性。这是一项前瞻性研究,纳入了500例单胎妊娠。超声检查由住院医师在分娩日进行。计算估计胎儿体重(EFW)并与相应的出生体重进行比较。EFW与出生体重之间的中位数绝对差值为200 g(100 - 330)。75.2% 的病例中,该差值在±10% 以内。中位数绝对百分比误差为5.53%(2.70% - 10.03%)。线性回归分析显示EFW与出生体重之间存在良好的相关性(r = 0.79,p < 0.0001)。根据Bland - Altman分析,偏差为 - 85.06 g(95% 一致性界限: - 663.33至494.21)。总之,住院医师计算的EFW与经验丰富的超声检查人员计算的EFW一样准确。然而,预测性能仍然有限,在巨大儿诊断中敏感性较低。