Department of Psychology, Université Catholique de Louvain
University of Pittsburgh.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Jan;7(1):39-53. doi: 10.1177/1745691611427303. Epub 2012 Jan 5.
Silence about the past permeates acts of remembering, with marked mnemonic consequences. Mnemonic silence-the absence of expressing a memory-is public in nature and is embedded within communicative acts, such as conversations. As such, silence has the potential to affect both speakers-the source of the silence-and listeners-those attending to the speaker. Although the topic of silence is widely discussed, it is rarely mentioned in the empirical literature on memory. Three factors are employed to classify silence into different types: whether a silence is accompanied by covert remembering, whether the silence is intentional or unintentional, and whether the silenced memory is related or unrelated to the memories emerging in a conversation. These factors appear to be critical when considering the mnemonic consequences. Moreover, the influence of silence on memory varies between speaker and listener. Although rarely mentioned, recent empirical research on memory clearly has a bearing on a topic of such general interest as silence.
过去的沉默渗透在记忆行为中,具有显著的记忆后果。记忆沉默——即不表达记忆——在本质上是公开的,并且嵌入在交际行为中,例如对话。因此,沉默有可能影响到沉默的来源——说话者,以及倾听者——那些关注说话者的人。尽管沉默这个话题被广泛讨论,但在记忆的实证文献中很少提及。有三个因素可将沉默分为不同类型:沉默是否伴随着隐性记忆,沉默是有意还是无意的,以及被抑制的记忆与对话中出现的记忆是否相关。这些因素在考虑记忆后果时似乎至关重要。此外,沉默对记忆的影响因说话者和倾听者而异。尽管很少被提及,但最近关于记忆的实证研究显然与沉默这一如此普遍关注的话题有关。