Deusto University, Bilbao, Spain.
Br J Psychol. 2011 Aug;102(3):392-405. doi: 10.1348/000712610X532210. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
Pseudoscience, superstitions, and quackery are serious problems that threaten public health and in which many variables are involved. Psychology, however, has much to say about them, as it is the illusory perceptions of causality of so many people that needs to be understood. The proposal we put forward is that these illusions arise from the normal functioning of the cognitive system when trying to associate causes and effects. Thus, we propose to apply basic research and theories on causal learning to reduce the impact of pseudoscience. We review the literature on the illusion of control and the causal learning traditions, and then present an experiment as an illustration of how this approach can provide fruitful ideas to reduce pseudoscientific thinking. The experiment first illustrates the development of a quackery illusion through the testimony of fictitious patients who report feeling better. Two different predictions arising from the integration of the causal learning and illusion of control domains are then proven effective in reducing this illusion. One is showing the testimony of people who feel better without having followed the treatment. The other is asking participants to think in causal terms rather than in terms of effectiveness.
伪科学、迷信和庸医是严重的问题,它们威胁着公众健康,涉及许多变量。然而,心理学对此有很多话要说,因为需要理解的是,许多人对因果关系的虚幻感知。我们提出的建议是,这些错觉是由于认知系统在试图关联原因和结果时的正常功能而产生的。因此,我们建议将因果学习的基础研究和理论应用于减少伪科学的影响。我们回顾了关于控制错觉和因果学习传统的文献,然后提出了一个实验,说明这种方法如何能够为减少伪科学思维提供富有成效的思路。该实验首先通过报告感觉好转的虚构患者的证词说明了庸医错觉的发展。然后证明了整合因果学习和控制错觉领域的两个不同预测可以有效地减少这种错觉。一个是展示感觉好转而没有接受治疗的人的证词。另一个是要求参与者用因果关系而不是有效性来思考。