Suppr超能文献

高危健康成年人中加速与标准乙肝疫苗接种方案的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Comparison of Accelerated and Standard Hepatitis B Vaccination Schedules in High-Risk Healthy Adults: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Jin Hui, Tan Zhaoying, Zhang Xuefeng, Wang Bei, Zhao Yueyuan, Liu Pei

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Southeast University, Nanjing, China; Key Laboratory of Environmental Medicine Engineering, Ministry of Education, School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.

Jiangsu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 21;10(7):e0133464. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133464. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Selecting the most efficient vaccination schedule is an important issue.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of accelerated hepatitis B vaccination schedules in high-risk healthy adults.

METHODS

We searched controlled trial registers of The Cochrane Library as well as MEDLINE, EMBASE, VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals, and the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for randomized controlled trials published up to December 2013 that compared accelerated hepatitis B vaccine schedules to the standard schedule in adults. The results were presented as relative risk with 95% confidence intervals. Fixed or random effect models were used for analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 10 randomized trials, all with one or more methodological weaknesses. Compared to the standard schedule, most accelerated schedules resulted in higher proportions of healthy vaccines more rapidly reaching anti-hepatitis B antibody levels >10 IU/L (P<0.05) initially and maintaining similar seroprotection rates after 6 months (P>0.05). Although accelerated schedules produced anti-hepatitis B levels higher than the standard schedule for the first month after the initial vaccine dose, they were significantly lower than the standard schedule after 6 months, except for an accelerated schedule that called for a fourth booster injection 12 months after the initial dose. Subjects administered accelerated vaccine schedules had similar compliance rate as those administered the standard schedule over the first 6 months of vaccination (relative risk = 1.00, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.21).

CONCLUSION

For rapid seroconversion and almost immediate short-term protection, accelerated vaccination schedules could be useful for at-risk groups. However, additional studies on the long-term protection and effectiveness of the primary doses of accelerated schedules are necessary.

摘要

背景

选择最有效的疫苗接种方案是一个重要问题。

目的

评估加速乙肝疫苗接种方案对高危健康成年人的有益和有害影响。

方法

我们检索了Cochrane图书馆的对照试验注册库以及MEDLINE、EMBASE、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)和中国知网数据库,以查找截至2013年12月发表的将成人乙肝疫苗加速接种方案与标准接种方案进行比较的随机对照试验。结果以相对风险及95%置信区间表示。采用固定效应或随机效应模型进行分析。

结果

我们确定了10项随机试验,所有试验都存在一个或多个方法学上的弱点。与标准接种方案相比,大多数加速接种方案能使更高比例的健康接种者更快地达到抗乙肝抗体水平>10 IU/L(P<0.05),并在6个月后保持相似的血清保护率(P>0.05)。尽管加速接种方案在初次接种疫苗后的第一个月产生的抗乙肝水平高于标准接种方案,但在6个月后显著低于标准接种方案,除了一种加速接种方案,该方案在初次接种后12个月需要进行第四次加强注射。在接种的前6个月,接受加速疫苗接种方案的受试者的依从率与接受标准接种方案的受试者相似(相对风险=1.00,95%置信区间:0.84-1.21)。

结论

对于快速血清转化和几乎即时的短期保护,加速接种方案可能对高危人群有用。然而,有必要对加速接种方案的主要剂量的长期保护和有效性进行更多研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验