Graham Rondell P, Vierkant Robert A, Tillmans Lori S, Wang Alice H, Laird Peter W, Weisenberger Daniel J, Lynch Charles F, French Amy J, Slager Susan L, Raissian Yassaman, Garcia Joaquin J, Kerr Sarah E, Lee Hee Eun, Thibodeau Stephen N, Cerhan James R, Limburg Paul J, Smyrk Thomas C
*Division of Anatomic Pathology †Department of Health Sciences Research ‡Division of Experimental Pathology #Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN §Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI ∥University of Southern California, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA ¶Department of Epidemiology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2015 Oct;39(10):1340-6. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000504.
Tumor budding in colorectal carcinoma has been associated with poor outcome in multiple studies, but the absence of an established histologic cutoff for "high" tumor budding, heterogeneity in study populations, and varying methods for assessing tumor budding have hindered widespread incorporation of this parameter in clinical reports. We used an established scoring system in a population-based cohort to determine a histologic cutoff for "high" tumor budding and confirm its prognostic significance. We retrieved hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections from 553 incident colorectal carcinoma cases. Each case was previously characterized for select molecular alterations and survival data. Interobserver agreement was assessed between 2 gastrointestinal pathologists and a group of 4 general surgical pathologists. High budding (≥ 10 tumor buds in a ×20 objective field) was present in 32% of cases, low budding in 46%, and no budding in 22%. High tumor budding was associated with advanced pathologic stage (P < 0.001), microsatellite stability (P = 0.005), KRAS mutation (P = 0.010), and on multivariate analysis with a > 2 times risk of cancer-specific death (hazard ratio = 2.57 [1.27, 5.19]). After multivariate adjustment, by penalized smoothing splines, we found increasing tumor bud counts from 5 upward to be associated with an increasingly shortened cancer-specific survival. By this method, a tumor bud count of 10 corresponded to approximately 2.5 times risk of cancer-specific death. The interobserver agreement was good with weighted κ of 0.70 for 2 gastrointestinal pathologists over 121 random cases and 0.72 between all 6 pathologists for 20 random cases. Using an established method to assess budding on routine histologic stains, we have shown that a cutoff of 10 for high tumor budding is independently associated with a significantly worse prognosis. The reproducibility data provide support for the routine widespread implementation of tumor budding in clinical reports.
多项研究表明,结直肠癌中的肿瘤芽生与预后不良相关,但由于缺乏“高”肿瘤芽生的既定组织学临界值、研究人群的异质性以及评估肿瘤芽生的方法各异,这一参数在临床报告中的广泛应用受到了阻碍。我们在一个基于人群的队列中使用既定的评分系统来确定“高”肿瘤芽生的组织学临界值,并确认其预后意义。我们从553例初发结直肠癌病例中获取了苏木精和伊红染色切片。每个病例先前已对特定分子改变和生存数据进行了特征描述。评估了2名胃肠病理学家与一组4名普通外科病理学家之间的观察者间一致性。32%的病例存在高芽生(在×20物镜视野中≥10个肿瘤芽),46%为低芽生,22%无芽生。高肿瘤芽生与晚期病理分期(P<0.001)、微卫星稳定性(P = 0.005)、KRAS突变(P = 0.010)相关,多因素分析显示癌症特异性死亡风险增加>2倍(风险比=2.57[1.27,5.19])。多因素调整后,通过惩罚平滑样条分析,我们发现肿瘤芽计数从5个以上增加与癌症特异性生存时间越来越短相关。通过这种方法,肿瘤芽计数为10对应癌症特异性死亡风险约2.5倍。对于121例随机病例,2名胃肠病理学家的加权κ值为0.70,观察者间一致性良好;对于20例随机病例,所有6名病理学家之间的加权κ值为0.72。使用既定方法在常规组织学染色上评估芽生,我们表明高肿瘤芽生的临界值为10与显著更差的预后独立相关。可重复性数据为肿瘤芽生在临床报告中的常规广泛应用提供了支持。