Jöst Vincent, Kretschmer Matthias, Sabatino Marcello, Würschmidt Florian, Dahle Jörg, Ueberle Friedrich, Lorenzen Jörn
Radiological Alliance, Mörkenstrasse 47, 22767, Hamburg, Germany,
Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Sep;191(9):734-41. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0874-7. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
The present study compares in silico treatment plans of clinically established three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) with a hybrid technique consisting of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) during normally fractionated radiation of mammary carcinomas with simultaneous integrated boost on the basis of dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters.
Radiation treatment planning was performed with a hybrid and a 3D-CRT treatment plan for 20 patients. Hybrid plans were implemented with two tangential IMRT fields and a VMAT field in the angular range of the tangents. Verification of the plan was performed with a manufacturer-independent measurement system consisting of a detector array and rotation unit.
The mean values of the heart dose for the entire patient collective were 3.6 ± 2.5 Gy for 3D-CRT and 2.9 ± 2.1 Gy for the hybrid technique (p < 0.01). For the left side (n = 10), the mean values for the left anterior descending artery were 21.8 ± 7.4 Gy for 3D-CRT and 17.6 ± 7.4 Gy for the hybrid technique (p < 0.01). The mean values of the ipsilateral lung were 11.9 ± 1.6 Gy for 3D-CRT and 10.5 ± 1.3 Gy for the hybrid technique (p < 0.01). Calculated dose distributions in the hybrid arm were in good accordance with measured dose (on average 95.6 ± 0.5 % for γ < 1 and 3 %/3 mm). The difference of the mean treatment time per fraction was 7 s in favor of 3D-CRT.
Compared with the established 3D-CRT technique, the hybrid technique allows for a decrease in dose, particularly of the mean heart and lung dose with comparable target volume acquisition and without disadvantageous low-dose load of contralateral structures. Uncomplicated implementation of the hybrid technique was demonstrated in this context. The hybrid technique combines the advantages of tangential IMRT with the superior sparing of organs at risk by VMAT.
本研究基于剂量体积直方图(DVH)参数,比较在乳腺癌常规分割放疗并同步整合加量过程中,临床已确立的三维适形放疗(3D-CRT)与由调强放疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)组成的混合技术的计算机模拟治疗计划。
为20例患者制定了混合技术和3D-CRT治疗计划的放射治疗计划。混合计划通过两个切线IMRT野和一个位于切线角度范围内的VMAT野实施。使用由探测器阵列和旋转单元组成的与制造商无关的测量系统对计划进行验证。
整个患者群体的心脏平均剂量,3D-CRT为3.6±2.5 Gy,混合技术为2.9±2.1 Gy(p<0.01)。左侧(n = 10),左前降支动脉的平均剂量,3D-CRT为21.8±7.4 Gy,混合技术为17.6±7.4 Gy(p<0.01)。同侧肺的平均剂量,3D-CRT为(11.9±1.6)Gy,混合技术为10.5±1.3 Gy(p<0.01)。混合组计算的剂量分布与测量剂量高度吻合(γ<1时平均为95.6±0.5%,3%/3 mm)。每分次平均治疗时间差异为7 s,3D-CRT更短。
与已确立的3D-CRT技术相比,混合技术可降低剂量,尤其是心脏和肺的平均剂量,在获得可比靶体积的情况下,且对侧结构无不利的低剂量负荷。在这种情况下证明了混合技术实施简单。混合技术结合了切线IMRT的优点和VMAT对危及器官的更好保护。