Wakschlag Lauren S, Estabrook Ryne, Petitclerc Amelie, Henry David, Burns James L, Perlman Susan B, Voss Joel L, Pine Daniel S, Leibenluft Ellen, Briggs-Gowan Margaret L
Department of Medical Social Sciences and the Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, IL.
Northwestern University, Chicago.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2015 Aug;54(8):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 Jun 14.
The importance of dimensional approaches is widely recognized, but an empirical base for clinical application is lacking. This is particularly true for irritability, a dimensional phenotype that cuts across many areas of psychopathology and manifests early in life. We examine longitudinal, dimensional patterns of irritability and their clinical import in early childhood.
Irritability was assessed longitudinally over an average of 16 months in a clinically enriched, diverse community sample of preschoolers (N = 497; mean = 4.2 years; SD = 0.8). Using the Temper Loss scale of the Multidimensional Assessment Profile of Disruptive Behavior (MAP-DB) as a developmentally sensitive indicator of early childhood irritability, we examined its convergent/divergent, clinical, and incremental predictive validity, and modeled its linear and nonlinear associations with clinical risk.
The Temper Loss scale demonstrated convergent and divergent validity to child and maternal factors. In multivariate analyses, Temper Loss predicted mood (separation anxiety disorder [SAD], generalized anxiety disorder [GAD], and depression/dysthymia), disruptive (oppositional defiant disorder [ODD], attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder [ADHD], and conduct disorder [CD]) symptoms. Preschoolers with even mildly elevated Temper Loss scale scores showed substantially increased risk of symptoms and disorders. For ODD, GAD, SAD, and depression, increases in Temper Loss scale scores at the higher end of the dimension had a greater impact on symptoms relative to increases at the lower end. Temper Loss scale scores also showed incremental validity over DSM-IV disorders in predicting subsequent impairment. Finally, accounting for the substantial heterogeneity in longitudinal patterns of Temper Loss significantly improved prediction of mood and disruptive symptoms.
Dimensional, longitudinal characterization of irritability informs clinical prediction. A vital next step will be empirically generating parameters for the incorporation of dimensional information into clinical decision-making with reasonable certainty.
维度方法的重要性已得到广泛认可,但临床应用缺乏实证基础。对于易怒性而言尤其如此,易怒性是一种跨越许多精神病理学领域且在生命早期就会表现出来的维度表型。我们研究了幼儿期易怒性的纵向维度模式及其临床意义。
在一个临床丰富、多样化的学龄前儿童社区样本(N = 497;平均年龄 = 4.2岁;标准差 = 0.8)中,对易怒性进行了平均16个月的纵向评估。使用破坏性行为多维评估量表(MAP-DB)的发脾气量表作为幼儿易怒性的发育敏感指标,我们检验了其聚合/区分效度、临床效度和增量预测效度,并对其与临床风险的线性和非线性关联进行了建模。
发脾气量表显示出与儿童和母亲因素的聚合和区分效度。在多变量分析中,发脾气量表可预测情绪(分离焦虑症[SAD]、广泛性焦虑症[GAD]和抑郁/心境恶劣)、破坏性行为(对立违抗障碍[ODD]、注意力缺陷多动障碍[ADHD]和品行障碍[CD])症状。即使发脾气量表得分轻度升高的学龄前儿童,出现症状和障碍的风险也大幅增加。对于ODD、GAD、SAD和抑郁,维度较高端的发脾气量表得分增加相对于较低端的增加对症状的影响更大。发脾气量表得分在预测后续损害方面也显示出相对于DSM-IV障碍的增量效度。最后,考虑到发脾气纵向模式中的大量异质性,显著改善了对情绪和破坏性行为症状的预测。
易怒性的维度纵向特征有助于临床预测。至关重要的下一步将是以合理的确定性通过实证生成将维度信息纳入临床决策的参数。