• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

离婚家庭的孩子——应对离婚:一项针对经历父母离异的青少年的在线预防项目的随机对照试验。

Children of divorce-coping with divorce: A randomized control trial of an online prevention program for youth experiencing parental divorce.

作者信息

Boring Jesse L, Sandler Irwin N, Tein Jenn-Yun, Horan John J, Vélez Clorinda E

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Human Services, SUNY Broome Community College.

REACH Institute, Department of Psychology, Arizona State University.

出版信息

J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):999-1005. doi: 10.1037/a0039567. Epub 2015 Jul 27.

DOI:10.1037/a0039567
PMID:26214543
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate an online coping skills program to prevent mental health problems in children and adolescents from divorced or separated families.

METHOD

Children ages 11-16 (N = 147) whose families had filed for divorce were recruited using public court records. Participants were blocked by risk-score and randomly assigned to either a control (Internet self-study condition, Best of the Net (BTN) or the experimental intervention, Children of Divorce-Coping With Divorce (CoD-CoD), a 5-module highly interactive online program to promote effective coping skills. Program effects were tested on measures of children's self-reported coping and parent and youth reports of children's mental health problems.

RESULTS

Significant main effects indicated that youth in CoD-CoD improved more on self-reported emotional problems relative to BTN youth (d = .37) and had a lower rate of clinically significant self-reported mental health problems (OR = .58, p = .04). A significant Baseline × Treatment interaction indicated that the 55% of youth with highest baseline problems improved more than those in BTN on their self-report of total mental health problems. A significant interaction effect indicated that CoD-CoD improved youth coping efficacy for the 30% of those with the lowest baseline coping efficacy. For the 10% of youth with lowest parent-reported risk at baseline, those who received BTN had lower problems than CoD-CoD participants.

CONCLUSIONS

CoD-CoD was effective in reducing youth-reported mental health problems and coping efficacy particularly for high risk youth. Parent-report indicated that, relative to BTN, CoD-CoD had a negative effect on mental health problems for a small group with the lowest risk.

摘要

目的

评估一项在线应对技能项目,以预防离异或分居家庭中儿童和青少年的心理健康问题。

方法

利用公共法庭记录招募了11至16岁(N = 147)且家庭已提起离婚诉讼的儿童。参与者按风险评分进行分组,并随机分配到对照组(互联网自学条件,网络精华(BTN))或实验性干预组,即离婚儿童应对离婚(CoD-CoD),这是一个包含5个模块的高度互动在线项目,旨在提升有效的应对技能。通过儿童自我报告的应对方式以及父母和青少年报告的儿童心理健康问题的测量指标来测试项目效果。

结果

显著的主效应表明,相对于BTN组的青少年,CoD-CoD组的青少年在自我报告的情绪问题上改善更为明显(d = 0.37),且自我报告的具有临床意义的心理健康问题发生率更低(OR = 0.58,p = 0.04)。显著的基线×治疗交互作用表明,基线问题最高的55%的青少年在心理健康问题总自我报告方面比BTN组的青少年改善更大。显著的交互效应表明,CoD-CoD提高了基线应对效能最低的30%的青少年的应对效能。对于基线时父母报告风险最低的10%的青少年,接受BTN的青少年比CoD-CoD参与者的问题更少。

结论

CoD-CoD在减少青少年报告的心理健康问题和应对效能方面有效,特别是对高风险青少年。父母报告表明,相对于BTN,CoD-CoD对风险最低的一小部分群体的心理健康问题有负面影响。

相似文献

1
Children of divorce-coping with divorce: A randomized control trial of an online prevention program for youth experiencing parental divorce.离婚家庭的孩子——应对离婚:一项针对经历父母离异的青少年的在线预防项目的随机对照试验。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015 Oct;83(5):999-1005. doi: 10.1037/a0039567. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
Enhancing Daily Affect in Youth Experiencing High-Conflict Parental Divorce: A Multiple Baseline Trial of an Online Prevention Program.改善经历高冲突父母离异的青少年的日常情绪:一项在线预防项目的多基线试验
Fam Court Rev. 2022 Jul;60(3):458-473. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12654. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
3
Coping in context: The effects of long-term relations between interparental conflict and coping on the development of child psychopathology following parental divorce.情境中的应对:父母离异后,父母冲突与应对之间的长期关系对儿童心理病理发展的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1695-1713. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000981.
4
Creating opportunities for parent empowerment: program effects on the mental health/coping outcomes of critically ill young children and their mothers.为家长赋权创造机会:该项目对危重症幼儿及其母亲心理健康/应对结果的影响。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):e597-607. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.6.e597.
5
Evaluation of support group interventions for children in troubled families: study protocol for a quasi-experimental control group study.对问题家庭中儿童的支持小组干预措施评估:一项准实验对照组研究的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 24;14:76. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-76.
6
Six-year follow-up of preventive interventions for children of divorce: a randomized controlled trial.离婚家庭子女预防性干预措施的六年随访:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1874-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1874.
7
The effects of parental divorce on children.父母离异对孩子的影响。
Psychiatriki. 2022 Mar 28;33(1):81-82. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.040. Epub 2021 Nov 26.
8
Effectiveness and moderators of the preventive intervention kids in divorce situations: A randomized controlled trial.离婚家庭儿童预防性干预措施的有效性及调节因素:一项随机对照试验
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Oct;29(5):799-805. doi: 10.1037/fam0000107. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
9
Enhancing youth outcomes following parental divorce: a longitudinal study of the effects of the new beginnings program on educational and occupational goals.增强父母离异后青少年的结果:新开端计划对教育和职业目标影响的纵向研究。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2012;41(2):150-65. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2012.651992.
10
Effects of a Program to Promote High Quality Parenting by Divorced and Separated Fathers.促进离婚和分居父亲高质量育儿的计划的效果。
Prev Sci. 2018 May;19(4):538-548. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0841-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Parenting Styles of Divorced Parents and Their Influence on Their Children's Bruxism: A Cross-Sectional Study.离异父母的养育方式及其对子女磨牙症的影响:一项横断面研究。
Pediatric Health Med Ther. 2025 Mar 27;16:83-92. doi: 10.2147/PHMT.S508109. eCollection 2025.
2
The "SES NXT" digital intervention for children of relationship dissolution: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial study.针对父母关系破裂家庭儿童的“SES NXT”数字干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Internet Interv. 2024 Dec 12;39:100797. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100797. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Review: Preventing Psychopathology in the Digital Age: Leveraging Technology to Target Coping and Emotion Regulation in Adolescents.
综述:数字时代预防精神病理学:利用技术针对青少年的应对和情绪调节
JAACAP Open. 2023 Oct 4;2(1):6-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.09.006. eCollection 2024 Mar.
4
Preventing Mental Health Problems in Children After High Conflict Parental Separation/Divorce Study: An Optimization Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol.高冲突父母分居/离婚后儿童心理健康问题预防研究:一项优化随机对照试验方案
Ment Health Prev. 2023 Dec;32. doi: 10.1016/j.mhp.2023.200301. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
5
Enhancing Daily Affect in Youth Experiencing High-Conflict Parental Divorce: A Multiple Baseline Trial of an Online Prevention Program.改善经历高冲突父母离异的青少年的日常情绪:一项在线预防项目的多基线试验
Fam Court Rev. 2022 Jul;60(3):458-473. doi: 10.1111/fcre.12654. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
6
Association between parental divorce and mental health outcomes among Lebanese adolescents: results of a national study.黎巴嫩青少年父母离异与心理健康状况的关联:一项全国性研究的结果。
BMC Pediatr. 2021 Oct 18;21(1):455. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02926-3.
7
Does Shared Parenting Help or Hurt Children in High Conflict Divorced Families?共同养育对高冲突离异家庭中的孩子是有帮助还是有伤害?
J Divorce Remarriage. 2018;59(4):324-347. doi: 10.1080/10502556.2018.1454200. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
8
Preventive digital mental health interventions for children and young people: a review of the design and reporting of research.针对儿童和青少年的预防性数字心理健康干预措施:研究设计与报告综述
NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Oct 15;3:133. doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00339-7. eCollection 2020.
9
Coping in context: The effects of long-term relations between interparental conflict and coping on the development of child psychopathology following parental divorce.情境中的应对:父母离异后,父母冲突与应对之间的长期关系对儿童心理病理发展的影响。
Dev Psychopathol. 2019 Dec;31(5):1695-1713. doi: 10.1017/S0954579419000981.
10
Experience of Child-Parent Separation and Later Risk of Violent Criminality.亲子分离经历与后期暴力犯罪风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Aug;55(2):178-186. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Jun 15.