Hur Hyewon, Kim Young Han, Cho Hee Young, Park Yong Won, Won Hye-Sung, Lee Mi-Young, Yun Bo Hyon, Lee Kwang Hee, Kim Sung Yoon, Yoo Junsang, Kwon Ja-Young
Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015 Jul;58(4):268-76. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2015.58.4.268. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
To evaluate the feasibility of five-dimensional Long Bone (5D LB), a new technique that automatically archives, reconstructs images, and measures lengths of fetal long bones, to assess whether the direction of volume sweep influences fetal long bone measurements in three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound and 5D LB, and to compare measurements of fetal long bone lengths obtained with 5D LB and those obtained with conventional two-dimensional (2D) and manual 3D techniques.
This prospective study included 39 singleton pregnancies at 26+0 to 32+0 weeks of gestation. Multiple pregnancies, fetuses with multiple congenital anomalies, and mothers with underlying medical diseases were excluded. Fetal long bones of the lower extremities-the femur, tibia, and fibula were measured by 2D and 3D ultrasound, and 5D LB, by an expert and non-expert examiner. First, we analyzed the 3D ultrasound and 5D LB data according to 2 different sweeping angles. We analyzed intra- and inter-observer variability and agreement between ultrasound techniques. Paired t-test, interclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman plot and Passing-Bablok regression were used for statistical analysis.
There was no statistical difference between long bone measurements analyzed according to 2 different volume-sweeping angles by 3D ultrasound and 5D LB. Intra- and inter-observer variability were not significantly different among all 3 ultrasound techniques. Comparing 2D ultrasound and 5D LB, the interclass correlation coefficient for femur, tibia, and fibula was 0.91, 0.92, and 0.89, respectively.
5D LB is reproducible and comparable with conventional 2D and 3D ultrasound techniques for fetal long bone measurement.
评估五维长骨(5D LB)技术的可行性,该技术可自动存档、重建图像并测量胎儿长骨长度;评估容积扫查方向是否会影响三维(3D)超声和5D LB中胎儿长骨的测量;比较5D LB获得的胎儿长骨长度测量值与传统二维(2D)及手动3D技术获得的测量值。
这项前瞻性研究纳入了39例妊娠26⁺⁰至32⁺⁰周的单胎妊娠。排除多胎妊娠、患有多种先天性异常的胎儿以及患有基础疾病的母亲。由一名专家和一名非专家检查者使用2D和3D超声以及5D LB测量胎儿下肢的长骨——股骨、胫骨和腓骨。首先,我们根据2种不同的扫查角度分析3D超声和5D LB数据。我们分析了观察者内和观察者间的变异性以及超声技术之间的一致性。采用配对t检验、组内相关系数、Bland-Altman图和Passing-Bablok回归进行统计分析。
3D超声和5D LB根据2种不同容积扫查角度分析的长骨测量值之间无统计学差异。在所有3种超声技术中,观察者内和观察者间的变异性无显著差异。比较2D超声和5D LB,股骨、胫骨和腓骨的组内相关系数分别为0.91、0.92和0.89。
5D LB在测量胎儿长骨方面具有可重复性,且与传统的2D和3D超声技术相当。