Anderson Lisa M, Reilly Erin E, Schaumberg Katherine, Dmochowski Sasha, Anderson Drew A
Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, 1400 Washington Ave., Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Drexel University, Philadelphia, USA.
Eat Weight Disord. 2016 Mar;21(1):83-90. doi: 10.1007/s40519-015-0210-3. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
Mindful eating and intuitive eating are promoted as means to circumvent potentially maladaptive dietary restraint while maintaining a healthy weight. Although theoretically related, no studies have examined the correlations between intuitive eating, mindful eating, and restraint in the same sample. This study sought to examine these constructs and their correlations with body mass index (BMI), eating-disordered behaviors, and meal consumption in a college sample.
Participants (N = 125) completed a laboratory taste-test meal and measures of each eating-related construct using the EDDS, IES, MEQ, and TFEQ-Restraint Subscale.
Mindful eating, intuitive eating, and restraint were not strongly correlated. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses indicated that restraint and intuitive eating accounted for significant variance in disordered eating and BMI. Elevated restraint was associated with increased BMI and disordered eating; elevated intuitive eating was associated with decreased BMI and disordered eating. Mindful eating did not correlate with any outcome variables. Follow-up analyses suggested that specific intuitive eating subscales accounted for unique variance in the relation between intuitive eating and disordered eating. Intuitive eating was the only construct that was significantly associated with meal consumption.
Intuitive eating and restraint appear to be only weakly correlated, and each is differentially associated with meal consumption. Mindful eating does not appear to relate to outcome variables.
正念饮食和直觉性饮食被倡导为在维持健康体重的同时规避潜在适应不良的饮食限制的方法。尽管在理论上相关,但尚无研究在同一样本中检验直觉性饮食、正念饮食和饮食限制之间的相关性。本研究旨在检验这些构念及其与大学生样本中的体重指数(BMI)、饮食失调行为和进餐量的相关性。
参与者(N = 125)完成了一次实验室味觉测试餐,并使用进食障碍诊断量表(EDDS)、直觉饮食量表(IES)、正念饮食问卷(MEQ)和三因素饮食问卷-限制分量表(TFEQ-Restraint Subscale)对每个与饮食相关的构念进行测量。
正念饮食、直觉性饮食和饮食限制之间的相关性不强。分层多元回归分析表明,饮食限制和直觉性饮食在饮食失调和BMI方面解释了显著的方差。较高的饮食限制与BMI增加和饮食失调相关;较高的直觉性饮食与BMI降低和饮食失调相关。正念饮食与任何结果变量均无相关性。后续分析表明,特定的直觉性饮食分量表在直觉性饮食与饮食失调的关系中解释了独特的方差。直觉性饮食是唯一与进餐量显著相关的构念。
直觉性饮食和饮食限制似乎仅存在微弱的相关性,且二者与进餐量的关联各不相同。正念饮食似乎与结果变量无关。