• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

集体注意力与股票价格:来自谷歌趋势关于标准普尔100指数数据的证据

Collective attention and stock prices: evidence from Google Trends data on Standard and Poor's 100.

作者信息

Heiberger Raphael H

机构信息

Institute for Sociology, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Aug 10;10(8):e0135311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135311. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0135311
PMID:26258498
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4530949/
Abstract

Today´s connected world allows people to gather information in shorter intervals than ever before, widely monitored by massive online data sources. As a dramatic economic event, recent financial crisis increased public interest for large companies considerably. In this paper, we exploit this change in information gathering behavior by utilizing Google query volumes as a "bad news" indicator for each corporation listed in the Standard and Poor´s 100 index. Our results provide not only an investment strategy that gains particularly in times of financial turmoil and extensive losses by other market participants, but reveal new sectoral patterns between mass online behavior and (bearish) stock market movements. Based on collective attention shifts in search queries for individual companies, hence, these findings can help to identify early warning signs of financial systemic risk. However, our disaggregated data also illustrate the need for further efforts to understand the influence of collective attention shifts on financial behavior in times of regular market activities with less tremendous changes in search volumes.

摘要

在当今互联互通的世界中,人们获取信息的时间间隔比以往任何时候都短,且受到海量在线数据源的广泛监测。作为一个重大的经济事件,近期的金融危机极大地提高了公众对大公司的关注度。在本文中,我们利用谷歌搜索量作为标准普尔100指数中每家公司的“坏消息”指标,来探究这种信息收集行为的变化。我们的研究结果不仅提供了一种投资策略,这种策略在金融动荡时期以及其他市场参与者遭受巨大损失时能特别获利,还揭示了大众在线行为与(看跌的)股市走势之间新的行业模式。基于对各公司搜索查询中集体注意力的转移,因此,这些发现有助于识别金融系统性风险的早期预警信号。然而,我们的细分数据也表明,在搜索量变化较小的正常市场活动时期,仍需进一步努力去理解集体注意力转移对金融行为的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/626ebdcadfc0/pone.0135311.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/f2a51012355d/pone.0135311.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/eea2afa9ae31/pone.0135311.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/a1ffad4f4324/pone.0135311.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/ed5ffdcd4862/pone.0135311.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/94267830e4a9/pone.0135311.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/626ebdcadfc0/pone.0135311.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/f2a51012355d/pone.0135311.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/eea2afa9ae31/pone.0135311.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/a1ffad4f4324/pone.0135311.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/ed5ffdcd4862/pone.0135311.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/94267830e4a9/pone.0135311.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/97a1/4530949/626ebdcadfc0/pone.0135311.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Collective attention and stock prices: evidence from Google Trends data on Standard and Poor's 100.集体注意力与股票价格:来自谷歌趋势关于标准普尔100指数数据的证据
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 10;10(8):e0135311. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135311. eCollection 2015.
2
Quantifying trading behavior in financial markets using Google Trends.使用谷歌趋势量化金融市场中的交易行为。
Sci Rep. 2013;3:1684. doi: 10.1038/srep01684.
3
Scaling and volatility of breakouts and breakdowns in stock price dynamics.股价动态中突破与跌破的规模及波动性。
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 23;8(12):e82771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082771. eCollection 2013.
4
Cross-correlation asymmetries and causal relationships between stock and market risk.股票与市场风险之间的互相关不对称性及因果关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Aug 27;9(8):e105874. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105874. eCollection 2014.
5
Ricci curvature: An economic indicator for market fragility and systemic risk.Ricci 曲率:市场脆弱性和系统性风险的经济指标。
Sci Adv. 2016 May 27;2(5):e1501495. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1501495. eCollection 2016 May.
6
Decrypting Financial Markets through E-Joint Attention Efforts: On-Line Adaptive Networks of Investors in Periods of Market Uncertainty.通过电子共同关注努力解密金融市场:市场不确定性时期投资者的在线自适应网络
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0133712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133712. eCollection 2015.
7
Research on multiple bubbles in China's multi-level stock market.中国多层次股票市场中的多泡研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 2;16(8):e0255476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255476. eCollection 2021.
8
Association between Stock Market Gains and Losses and Google Searches.股票市场涨跌与谷歌搜索之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 29;10(10):e0141354. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141354. eCollection 2015.
9
Quantifying the effect of investors' attention on stock market.量化投资者注意力对股票市场的影响。
PLoS One. 2017 May 23;12(5):e0176836. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176836. eCollection 2017.
10
Quantifying Stock Return Distributions in Financial Markets.量化金融市场中的股票收益分布
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 1;10(9):e0135600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135600. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Bitcoin: A life in crises.比特币:多灾多难的一生。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 30;17(9):e0274165. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274165. eCollection 2022.
2
Effects of COVID-Induced Public Anxiety on European Stock Markets: Evidence From a Fear-Based Algorithmic Trading System.新冠疫情引发的公众焦虑对欧洲股票市场的影响:基于恐惧的算法交易系统的证据
Front Psychol. 2022 Jan 14;12:780992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780992. eCollection 2021.
3
Google search volumes and the financial markets during the COVID-19 outbreak.新冠疫情期间的谷歌搜索量与金融市场

本文引用的文献

1
What are the main drivers of the Bitcoin price? Evidence from wavelet coherence analysis.比特币价格的主要驱动因素有哪些?来自小波相干分析的证据。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 15;10(4):e0123923. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123923. eCollection 2015.
2
Social sciences. Social media for large studies of behavior.社会科学。用于大规模行为研究的社交媒体。
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1063-4. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6213.1063.
3
The digital traces of bubbles: feedback cycles between socio-economic signals in the Bitcoin economy.比特币经济中社会经济信号之间的反馈循环:泡沫的数字痕迹
Financ Res Lett. 2021 Oct;42:101884. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101884. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
4
On the impact of publicly available news and information transfer to financial markets.关于公开新闻和信息传递对金融市场的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 Jul 28;8(7):202321. doi: 10.1098/rsos.202321. eCollection 2021 Jul.
5
Revisiting the use of web search data for stock market movements.重新审视网络搜索数据在股市走势预测中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 18;9(1):13511. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-50131-1.
6
Fluctuation-driven price dynamics and investment strategies.波动驱动的价格动态与投资策略。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 14;12(12):e0189274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189274. eCollection 2017.
7
Identifying Key Drivers of Return Reversal with Dynamical Bayesian Factor Graph.使用动态贝叶斯因子图识别回报反转的关键驱动因素。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 28;11(11):e0167050. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167050. eCollection 2016.
8
The Detection of Emerging Trends Using Wikipedia Traffic Data and Context Networks.利用维基百科流量数据和上下文网络检测新兴趋势
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 31;10(12):e0141892. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141892. eCollection 2015.
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Oct 6;11(99). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0623.
4
Quantifying the semantics of search behavior before stock market moves.量化市场变动前的搜索行为语义。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Aug 12;111(32):11600-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1324054111. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
5
Consentaneous agent-based and stochastic model of the financial markets.基于主体的金融市场一致随机模型。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102201. eCollection 2014.
6
Cohesiveness in financial news and its relation to market volatility.金融新闻的凝聚力及其与市场波动的关系。
Sci Rep. 2014 May 22;4:5038. doi: 10.1038/srep05038.
7
Impact of stock market structure on intertrade time and price dynamics.股票市场结构对交易间隔时间和价格动态的影响。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 3;9(4):e92885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0092885. eCollection 2014.
8
Big data. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis.大数据。谷歌流感预测的教训:大数据分析中的陷阱。
Science. 2014 Mar 14;343(6176):1203-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1248506.
9
Trading network predicts stock price.交易网络预测股价。
Sci Rep. 2014 Jan 16;4:3711. doi: 10.1038/srep03711.
10
Quantifying the relationship between financial news and the stock market.量化金融新闻与股票市场之间的关系。
Sci Rep. 2013 Dec 20;3:3578. doi: 10.1038/srep03578.