Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Ambarki K, Eklund A, Lindén C
Department of Clinical Science, Ophthalmology, Umeå University, SE-901 87, Umeå, SWEDEN.
Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, SWEDEN.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Nov;253(11):1979-83. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-3129-5. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
To investigate the effect of aging on ocular parameters, including intraocular pressure (IOP), measured with different tonometry methods in healthy young (HY) and healthy elderly (HE) subjects and to study the effect of corneal parameters on tonometry methods.
In this prospective, cross-sectional study, fifty eyes of 50 HY subjects (28 females, 22-31 years of age) and 43 eyes of 43 HE subjects (22 females, 64-79) were included. IOP was measured with four tonometry methods in a standardized order: ocular response analyser (ORA), dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), applanation resonance tonometry (ART) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT). Other measurements included axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature (CC), anterior chamber volume (ACV), corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF).
The mean IOP (HY/HE; mmHg ± standard deviation (SD)) was 12.2 ± 2.2/14.1 ± 3.5 with GAT. IOP was significantly higher (difference ± standard error) in HE compared to HY measured with an ORA (+3.1 mmHg ± 0.6), GAT (+1.9 ± 0.6) and DCT (+1.6 ± 0.6). No significant difference was found in IOP measured with ART. CH and ACV were significantly lower in HE compared to HY. There was no difference between the groups in CCT, CC, AL or CRF. No tonometry method was dependant on CCT or CC.
IOP measured with an ORA and via DCT and GAT was higher in HE compared to HY Swedish subjects, while IOP measured with ART did not differ between the groups. In these homogeneous groups, tonometry methods were independent of CCT and CC.
研究衰老对健康年轻(HY)和健康老年(HE)受试者眼部参数(包括眼压(IOP))的影响,这些眼压通过不同的眼压测量方法进行测量,并研究角膜参数对眼压测量方法的影响。
在这项前瞻性横断面研究中,纳入了50名HY受试者(28名女性,年龄22 - 31岁)的50只眼和43名HE受试者(22名女性,年龄64 - 79岁)的43只眼。以标准化顺序用四种眼压测量方法测量眼压:眼反应分析仪(ORA)、动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)、压平共振眼压计(ART)和Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)。其他测量包括眼轴长度(AL)、中央角膜厚度(CCT)、角膜曲率(CC)、前房容积(ACV)、角膜滞后(CH)和角膜阻力因子(CRF)。
使用GAT测量时,平均眼压(HY/HE;mmHg ± 标准差(SD))为12.2 ± 2.2/14.1 ± 3.5。与使用ORA(+3.1 mmHg ± 0.6)、GAT(+1.9 ± 0.6)和DCT(+1.6 ± 0.6)测量的HY相比,HE的眼压显著更高(差值 ± 标准误)。使用ART测量的眼压未发现显著差异。与HY相比,HE的CH和ACV显著更低。两组在CCT、CC、AL或CRF方面没有差异。没有眼压测量方法依赖于CCT或CC。
与瑞典HY受试者相比,HE受试者使用ORA、DCT和GAT测量的眼压更高,而使用ART测量的眼压在两组之间没有差异。在这些同质组中,眼压测量方法独立于CCT和CC。