Thomas Hannah J, Chan Gary C K, Scott James G, Connor Jason P, Kelly Adrian B, Williams Joanne
The University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2016 Apr;50(4):371-9. doi: 10.1177/0004867415600076. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
The frequency and emotional response to bullying victimisation are known to be associated with adolescent mental ill health. A potentially important under-investigated factor is the form of bullying. Four common forms of bullying behaviours are name-calling, physical threats or harm, rumour spreading and social exclusion. To more comprehensively understand bullying victimisation in adolescence, we examined the association of all three factors (frequency, emotional response, form) to psychological distress and emotional wellbeing.
A stratified, random sample of adolescents (n = 10, 273; mean age = 14.33 years, standard deviation = 1.68 years) completed validated measures of bullying victimisation (Gatehouse Bullying Questionnaire), psychological distress (K10) and emotional wellbeing (Mental Health Inventory) in classroom time. Associations between the form of bullying victimisation and mental health outcomes were examined.
Adolescents reported a high prevalence of all four forms of bullying: teased or called names (30.6%), rumour spreading (17.9%), social exclusion (14.3%) and physical threats or harm (10.7%). Victimisation was independently associated with significantly higher levels of psychological distress and reduced levels of emotional wellbeing for all forms of bullying. In particular, social exclusion had a strong association with mental ill health. Adolescents who experienced frequent bullying that was upsetting reported higher psychological distress and reduced emotional wellbeing.
Different forms of bullying victimisation were independently associated with psychological distress and reduced emotional wellbeing. In particular, frequent and upsetting social exclusion requires a targeted and measured response by school communities and health practitioners.
已知遭受欺凌的频率和情绪反应与青少年心理健康问题有关。一个潜在的重要但研究不足的因素是欺凌的形式。四种常见的欺凌行为形式是辱骂、身体威胁或伤害、谣言传播和社会排斥。为了更全面地了解青少年时期的欺凌受害情况,我们研究了所有这三个因素(频率、情绪反应、形式)与心理困扰和情绪健康之间的关联。
对青少年进行分层随机抽样(n = 10273;平均年龄 = 14.33岁,标准差 = 1.68岁),让他们在课堂时间内完成经过验证的欺凌受害情况测量(盖特豪斯欺凌问卷)、心理困扰测量(K10)和情绪健康测量(心理健康量表)。研究了欺凌受害形式与心理健康结果之间的关联。
青少年报告称,所有四种欺凌形式的发生率都很高:被取笑或辱骂(30.6%)、谣言传播(17.9%)、社会排斥(14.3%)和身体威胁或伤害(10.7%)。对于所有形式的欺凌,受害情况都与心理困扰水平显著升高和情绪健康水平降低独立相关。特别是,社会排斥与心理健康问题有很强的关联。经历频繁且令人苦恼的欺凌的青少年报告有更高的心理困扰和更低的情绪健康水平。
不同形式的欺凌受害情况与心理困扰和情绪健康水平降低独立相关。特别是,频繁且令人苦恼的社会排斥需要学校社区和健康从业者做出有针对性且适度的应对。