Taipale Kristian, Liikanen Ilkka, Juhila Juuso, Turkki Riku, Tähtinen Siri, Kankainen Matti, Vassilev Lotta, Ristimäki Ari, Koski Anniina, Kanerva Anna, Diaconu Iulia, Cerullo Vincenzo, Vähä-Koskela Markus, Oksanen Minna, Linder Nina, Joensuu Timo, Lundin Johan, Hemminki Akseli
University of Helsinki, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Cancer Gene Therapy Group, Helsinki, Finland.
Oncos Therapeutics, Ltd., Helsinki, Finland.
Mol Ther. 2016 Feb;24(1):175-83. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.143. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
Despite many clinical trials conducted with oncolytic viruses, the exact tumor-level mechanisms affecting therapeutic efficacy have not been established. Currently there are no biomarkers available that would predict the clinical outcome to any oncolytic virus. To assess the baseline immunological phenotype and find potential prognostic biomarkers, we monitored mRNA expression levels in 31 tumor biopsy or fluid samples from 27 patients treated with oncolytic adenovirus. Additionally, protein expression was studied from 19 biopsies using immunohistochemical staining. We found highly significant changes in several signaling pathways and genes associated with immune responses, such as B-cell receptor signaling (P < 0.001), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) signaling (P < 0.001), and leukocyte extravasation signaling (P < 0.001), in patients surviving a shorter time than their controls. In immunohistochemical analysis, markers CD4 and CD163 were significantly elevated (P = 0.020 and P = 0.016 respectively), in patients with shorter than expected survival. Interestingly, T-cell exhaustion marker TIM-3 was also found to be significantly upregulated (P = 0.006) in patients with poor prognosis. Collectively, these data suggest that activation of several functions of the innate immunity before treatment is associated with inferior survival in patients treated with oncolytic adenovirus. Conversely, lack of chronic innate inflammation at baseline may predict improved treatment outcome, as suggested by good overall prognosis.
尽管开展了许多溶瘤病毒临床试验,但影响治疗效果的肿瘤层面的确切机制尚未明确。目前还没有可用于预测任何溶瘤病毒临床结果的生物标志物。为了评估基线免疫表型并寻找潜在的预后生物标志物,我们监测了27例接受溶瘤腺病毒治疗患者的31份肿瘤活检或体液样本中的mRNA表达水平。此外,还使用免疫组织化学染色对19份活检样本进行了蛋白质表达研究。我们发现,生存期短于对照组的患者,其与免疫反应相关的几种信号通路和基因发生了高度显著变化,如B细胞受体信号通路(P < 0.001)、粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子(GM-CSF)信号通路(P < 0.001)和白细胞外渗信号通路(P < 0.001)。在免疫组织化学分析中,生存期短于预期的患者中,标志物CD4和CD163显著升高(分别为P = 0.020和P = 0.016)。有趣的是,预后不良的患者中,T细胞耗竭标志物TIM-3也被发现显著上调(P = 0.006)。总体而言,这些数据表明,治疗前先天免疫的多种功能激活与溶瘤腺病毒治疗患者的较差生存期相关。相反,如良好的总体预后所示,基线时缺乏慢性先天炎症可能预示着治疗效果改善。