• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同预防压疮重新定位策略的成本效益分析。

A cost-effectiveness analysis of two different repositioning strategies for the prevention of pressure ulcers.

作者信息

Marsden Grace, Jones Katie, Neilson Julie, Avital Liz, Collier Mark, Stansby Gerard

机构信息

Office of Health Economics, London, UK.

Royal College of Physicians, London, UK.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2879-85. doi: 10.1111/jan.12753. Epub 2015 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1111/jan.12753
PMID:26310968
Abstract

AIMS

To assess the cost effectiveness of two repositioning strategies and inform the 2014 National Institute for Health and Care Excellence clinical guideline recommendations on pressure ulcer prevention.

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers are distressing events, caused when skin and underlying tissues are placed under pressure sufficient to impair blood supply. They can have a substantial impact on quality of life and have significant resource implications. Repositioning is a key prevention strategy, but can be resource intensive, leading to variation in practice. This economic analysis was conducted to identify the most cost-effective repositioning strategy for the prevention of pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

The economic analysis took the form of a cost-utility model.

METHODS

The clinical inputs to the model were taken from a systematic review of clinical data. The population in the model was older people in a nursing home. The economic model was developed with members of the guideline development group and included costs borne by the UK National Health Service. Outcomes were expressed as costs and quality adjusted life years.

CONCLUSION

Despite being marginally more clinically effective, alternating 2 and 4 hourly repositioning is not a cost-effective use of UK National Health Service resources (compared with 4 hourly repositioning) for this high risk group of patients at a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000 per quality adjusted life years. These results were used to inform the clinical guideline recommendations for those who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers.

摘要

目的

评估两种重新定位策略的成本效益,并为2014年英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所关于压疮预防的临床指南建议提供依据。

背景

压疮是令人痛苦的情况,当皮肤及皮下组织受到足以损害血液供应的压力时就会引发。它们会对生活质量产生重大影响,并带来巨大的资源问题。重新定位是一项关键的预防策略,但可能耗费资源,导致实践中的差异。进行这项经济分析是为了确定预防压疮最具成本效益的重新定位策略。

设计

经济分析采用成本效用模型的形式。

方法

模型的临床输入数据来自对临床数据的系统评价。模型中的人群为养老院中的老年人。经济模型由指南制定小组的成员共同开发,纳入了英国国家医疗服务体系承担的成本。结果以成本和质量调整生命年表示。

结论

对于每质量调整生命年成本效益阈值为20,000英镑的这类高风险患者群体,尽管每2小时和4小时交替重新定位在临床效果上略好,但并非英国国家医疗服务体系资源的成本效益使用方式(与每4小时重新定位相比)。这些结果被用于为有发生压疮高风险人群的临床指南建议提供依据。

相似文献

1
A cost-effectiveness analysis of two different repositioning strategies for the prevention of pressure ulcers.两种不同预防压疮重新定位策略的成本效益分析。
J Adv Nurs. 2015 Dec;71(12):2879-85. doi: 10.1111/jan.12753. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
2
Does repositioning prevent pressure ulcers? Show me the evidence!重新摆放体位能预防压疮吗?拿出证据来!
Qld Nurse. 2014 Aug;33(4):32-3.
3
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Nutritional Support for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients.高危住院患者预防压疮营养支持的成本效益分析
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2016 Jun;29(6):261-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000482992.87682.4c.
4
Pressure ulcers: guideline development and economic modelling.压疮:指南制定与经济建模
J Adv Nurs. 2005 May;50(3):307-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03394.x.
5
Using a national guideline to prevent and manage pressure ulcers.使用国家指南预防和管理压疮。
Nurs Manag (Harrow). 2014 May;21(2):18-21. doi: 10.7748/nm2014.04.21.2.18.s22.
6
PROTECT - trial: a multicentre prospective pragmatic RCT and health economic analysis of the effect of tailored repositioning to prevent pressure ulcers - study protocol.PROTECT-试验:一项多中心前瞻性实用 RCT 及经济分析,研究定制翻身对预防压疮的效果-研究方案。
J Adv Nurs. 2017 Feb;73(2):495-503. doi: 10.1111/jan.13166. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
7
Pressure Ulcer Risk and Prevention Practices in Pediatric Patients: A Secondary Analysis of Data from the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators®.儿科患者的压疮风险与预防措施:对来自国家护理质量指标数据库®数据的二次分析
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2017 Jan;63(2):28-32.
8
Cost analysis for guideline implementation in prevention and early treatment of pressure ulcers.预防和早期治疗压疮指南实施的成本分析
Decubitus. 1993 Mar;6(2):42-6.
9
Preventing pressure ulcers in long-term care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.长期护理中预防压疮:一项成本效益分析。
Arch Intern Med. 2011 Nov 14;171(20):1839-47. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.473. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
10
An economic analysis of repositioning for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压力性溃疡的重新定位的经济分析。
J Clin Nurs. 2013 Aug;22(15-16):2354-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2012.04310.x.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations in Clinical Nursing Practices.临床护理实践中经济评估的系统评价
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Aug 9;2024:9939254. doi: 10.1155/2024/9939254. eCollection 2024.
2
Dressing interventions to heal pressure ulcers: A protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.用于治疗压疮的敷料干预措施:系统评价与荟萃分析概述的方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 9;99(41):e22699. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022699.
3
Effects of gelatin sponge combined with moist wound-healing nursing intervention in the treatment of phase III bedsore.
明胶海绵联合湿性伤口愈合护理干预对Ⅲ期压疮的治疗效果
Exp Ther Med. 2016 Jun;11(6):2213-2216. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3191. Epub 2016 Mar 24.