Suppr超能文献

北欧公共卫生学院(NHV)的方法开发:现象学与扎根理论。

Method development at Nordic School of Public Health NHV: Phenomenology and Grounded Theory.

作者信息

Strandmark Margaretha

机构信息

Institution of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Sweden

出版信息

Scand J Public Health. 2015 Aug;43(16 Suppl):61-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494814568598.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Qualitative methods such as phenomenology and grounded theory have been valuable tools in studying public health problems.

AIM

A description and comparison of these methods.

RESULTS

Phenomenology emphasises an inside perspective in form of consciousness and subjectively lived experiences, whereas grounded theory emanates from the idea that interactions between people create new insights and knowledge. Fundamental aspects of phenomenology include life world, consciousness, phenomenological reduction and essence. Significant elements in grounded theory are coding, categories and core categories, which develop a theory.

CONCLUSIONS

There are differences in the philosophical approach, the name of the concept and the systematic tools between the methods. Thus, the phenomenological method is appropriate when studying emotional and existential research problems, and grounded theory is a method more suited to investigate processes.

摘要

背景

现象学和扎根理论等定性方法一直是研究公共卫生问题的宝贵工具。

目的

对这些方法进行描述和比较。

结果

现象学强调以内在视角的形式呈现意识和主观生活体验,而扎根理论则源于人与人之间的互动会产生新见解和知识这一观点。现象学的基本方面包括生活世界、意识、现象学还原和本质。扎根理论的重要元素是编码、类别和核心类别,这些会发展出一种理论。

结论

这些方法在哲学方法、概念名称和系统工具方面存在差异。因此,现象学方法适用于研究情感和存在主义研究问题,而扎根理论更适合用于调查过程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验