Strandmark Margaretha
Institution of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, Sweden
Scand J Public Health. 2015 Aug;43(16 Suppl):61-5. doi: 10.1177/1403494814568598.
Qualitative methods such as phenomenology and grounded theory have been valuable tools in studying public health problems.
A description and comparison of these methods.
Phenomenology emphasises an inside perspective in form of consciousness and subjectively lived experiences, whereas grounded theory emanates from the idea that interactions between people create new insights and knowledge. Fundamental aspects of phenomenology include life world, consciousness, phenomenological reduction and essence. Significant elements in grounded theory are coding, categories and core categories, which develop a theory.
There are differences in the philosophical approach, the name of the concept and the systematic tools between the methods. Thus, the phenomenological method is appropriate when studying emotional and existential research problems, and grounded theory is a method more suited to investigate processes.
现象学和扎根理论等定性方法一直是研究公共卫生问题的宝贵工具。
对这些方法进行描述和比较。
现象学强调以内在视角的形式呈现意识和主观生活体验,而扎根理论则源于人与人之间的互动会产生新见解和知识这一观点。现象学的基本方面包括生活世界、意识、现象学还原和本质。扎根理论的重要元素是编码、类别和核心类别,这些会发展出一种理论。
这些方法在哲学方法、概念名称和系统工具方面存在差异。因此,现象学方法适用于研究情感和存在主义研究问题,而扎根理论更适合用于调查过程。