• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multiple Family Group Service Model for Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at Post-Treatment.针对破坏性行为障碍儿童的多家庭团体服务模式:治疗后的儿童结果
J Emot Behav Disord. 2015 Jun;23(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1063426614532690.
2
Multiple Family Groups to reduce child disruptive behavior difficulties: moderating effects of child welfare status on child outcomes.多家庭小组以减少儿童破坏性行为问题:儿童福利状况对儿童结局的调节作用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2015 Aug;46:207-19. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
3
Multiple Family Groups for Children with Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at 6-Month Follow-Up.针对破坏性行为障碍儿童的多家庭小组:6个月随访时的儿童结局
J Child Fam Stud. 2015 Sep;24(9):2721-2733. doi: 10.1007/s10826-014-0074-6.
4
Using mobile health technology to improve behavioral skill implementation through homework in evidence-based parenting intervention for disruptive behavior disorders in youth: study protocol for intervention development and evaluation.利用移动健康技术,通过基于证据的青少年破坏性行为障碍育儿干预中的家庭作业来改善行为技能的实施:干预开发与评估的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Sep 20;2:57. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0097-4. eCollection 2016.
5
The Post-intervention Impact of Amaka Amasanyufu on Behavioral and Mental Health Functioning of Children and Adolescents in Low-Resource Communities in Uganda: Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Trial From the SMART Africa-Uganda Study (2016-2022).乌干达资源匮乏社区儿童和青少年的行为和心理健康功能在 Amaka Amasanyufu 干预后的影响:来自 SMART Africa-Uganda 研究(2016-2022 年)的一项集群随机试验分析
J Adolesc Health. 2023 May;72(5S):S3-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2022.09.035.
6
Psychiatric comorbidity, family dysfunction, and social impairment in referred youth with oppositional defiant disorder.转介来的患有对立违抗障碍的青少年的精神共病、家庭功能障碍和社会功能损害
Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Jul;159(7):1214-24. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.7.1214.
7
A Collaboratively Designed Child Mental Health Service Model: Multiple Family Groups for Urban Children with Conduct Difficulties.一种协同设计的儿童心理健康服务模式:针对有行为困难的城市儿童的多家庭小组
Res Soc Work Pract. 2011 Nov 1;21(6):664-674. doi: 10.1177/1049731511406740.
8
Strengthening mental health and research training in Sub-Saharan Africa (SMART Africa): Uganda study protocol.加强撒哈拉以南非洲地区的心理健康与研究培训(SMART Africa):乌干达研究方案
Trials. 2018 Aug 6;19(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2751-z.
9
Testing the 4Rs and 2Ss Multiple Family Group intervention: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.测试4R和2S多家庭小组干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):588. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2331-7.
10
The longitudinal impact of an evidence-based multiple family group intervention (Amaka Amasanyufu) on oppositional defiant disorder and impaired functioning among children in Uganda: analysis of a cluster randomized trial from the SMART Africa-Uganda scale-up study (2016-2022).基于证据的多家庭组干预(Amaaka Amasanyufu)对乌干达儿童对立违抗性障碍和功能受损的纵向影响:来自 SMART Africa-Uganda 扩展研究的一项群组随机试验的分析(2016-2022 年)。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2022 Nov;63(11):1252-1260. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13566. Epub 2022 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Stakeholder Perspectives on Acceptability of Implementing a Child Mental Health Intervention in Child Welfare Services: A Pilot Study.利益相关者对儿童福利服务中实施儿童心理健康干预措施可接受性的看法:一项试点研究。
J Public Child Welf. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1080/15548732.2025.2518370.
2
Empowering behaviors to address race with kids (EmBARK): A racial socialization program for white families.增强与孩子探讨种族问题的行为能力(EmBARK):一项针对白人家庭的种族社会化项目。
J Appl Dev Psychol. 2024 Sep-Oct;94. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2024.101696. Epub 2024 Aug 21.
3
Improving the efficacy and effectiveness of evidence-based psychosocial interventions for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children and adolescents.提高针对儿童和青少年注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的循证心理社会干预措施的疗效和效果。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 8;14(1):244. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-02890-3.
4
Implementing a Child Mental Health Intervention in Child Welfare Services: Stakeholder Perspectives on Feasibility.在儿童福利服务中实施儿童心理健康干预:利益相关者对可行性的看法。
J Emot Behav Disord. 2023 Sep;31(3):204-218. doi: 10.1177/10634266221120532. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
5
"I decided to participate….because I saw it as benefiting our community and families": a qualitative study of lay providers' experiences with delivering an evidence-based mental health intervention for families in Uganda.“我决定参与……是因为我认为这对我们的社区和家庭有益”:一项关于非专业提供者在乌干达为家庭提供循证心理健康干预经验的定性研究。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2023 Aug 21;17(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13033-023-00593-8.
6
An Examination of the 4 Rs 2 Ss for Problem Behaviors: A Preventive Approach.对问题行为的4R2S检查:一种预防方法。
Fam Soc. 2023 Jun;104(2):154-166. doi: 10.1177/10443894221133419. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
7
Short-Term Impact of "Amaka Amasanyufu" Multiple Family Group Intervention on Mental Health Functioning of Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders in Uganda.乌干达“阿玛卡·阿玛萨努富”多家庭小组干预对患有破坏性行为障碍儿童心理健康功能的短期影响。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2023 Jul;62(7):777-790. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.12.028. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
8
Suubi4StrongerFamilies: A study protocol for a clustered randomized clinical trial addressing child behavioral health by strengthening financial stability and parenting among families in Uganda.苏比4增强家庭力量:一项集群随机临床试验的研究方案,通过加强乌干达家庭的经济稳定性和养育方式来解决儿童行为健康问题。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 23;13:949156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.949156. eCollection 2022.
9
Recommendations for Diversifying Racial and Ethnic Representation in Autism Intervention Research: A Crossover Review of Recruitment and Retention Practices in Pediatric Mental Health.自闭症干预研究中种族和族裔代表性多元化的建议:儿科心理健康招募与留用实践的交叉审查
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 31;11(21):6468. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216468.
10
Strengthening System and Implementation Research Capacity for Child Mental Health and Family Well-being in Sub-Saharan Africa.加强撒哈拉以南非洲儿童心理健康和家庭福祉的系统及实施研究能力。
Glob Soc Welf. 2022 Mar;9(1):37-53. doi: 10.1007/s40609-021-00204-9. Epub 2021 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Do evidence-based interventions work when tested in the "real world?" A systematic review and meta-analysis of parent management training for the treatment of child disruptive behavior.基于证据的干预措施在“真实世界”中进行测试时是否有效? 父母管理培训治疗儿童破坏性行为的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Mar;16(1):18-34. doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0128-0.
2
Evidence-based youth psychotherapy in the mental health ecosystem.循证青少年心理治疗在精神卫生生态系统中的应用。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013;42(2):274-86. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.764824. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
3
Evaluation of "the incredible years" in Sweden: the transferability of an American parent-training program to Sweden.瑞典“难以置信的岁月”评估:一个美国家长培训计划向瑞典的可转移性。
Scand J Psychol. 2012 Jun;53(3):224-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2012.00955.x.
4
Testing standard and modular designs for psychotherapy treating depression, anxiety, and conduct problems in youth: a randomized effectiveness trial.测试针对青少年抑郁、焦虑和行为问题的心理治疗的标准和模块化设计:一项随机有效性试验。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 Mar;69(3):274-82. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.147. Epub 2011 Nov 7.
5
Parent training with high-risk immigrant chinese families: a pilot group randomized trial yielding practice-based evidence.高危移民华人家属的父母培训:一项产生实践证据的试点群组随机试验。
Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):413-26. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Mar 16.
6
A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of parent management training with varying degrees of therapist support.父母管理训练的随机对照有效性试验,采用不同程度的治疗师支持。
Behav Ther. 2010 Dec;41(4):530-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2010.02.004. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Is the Incredible Years programme effective for children with neuro-developmental disorders and for families with Social Services involvement in the "real world" of community CAMHS?在社区儿童与青少年心理健康服务(CAMHS)的“现实世界”中,“难以置信的岁月”项目对患有神经发育障碍的儿童以及有社会服务机构介入的家庭是否有效?
Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr;16(2):253-64. doi: 10.1177/1359104510366280. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
8
Engaging families into child mental health treatment: updates and special considerations.让家庭参与儿童心理健康治疗:最新情况及特殊考量
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010 Aug;19(3):182-96.
9
Review of Interventions to Improve Family Engagement and Retention in Parent and Child Mental Health Programs.改善家长与儿童心理健康项目中家庭参与度和留存率的干预措施综述。
J Child Fam Stud. 2010 Oct 1;19(5):629-645. doi: 10.1007/s10826-009-9350-2.
10
Family support in children's mental health: a review and synthesis.家庭对儿童心理健康的支持:综述与综合。
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2010 Mar;13(1):1-45. doi: 10.1007/s10567-009-0060-5.

针对破坏性行为障碍儿童的多家庭团体服务模式:治疗后的儿童结果

Multiple Family Group Service Model for Children With Disruptive Behavior Disorders: Child Outcomes at Post-Treatment.

作者信息

Chacko Anil, Gopalan Geetha, Franco Lydia, Dean-Assael Kara, Jackson Jerrold, Marcus Sue, Hoagwood Kimberly, McKay Mary

机构信息

City University of New York, NY, USA ; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA ; New York University, USA.

New York University, USA ; University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA.

出版信息

J Emot Behav Disord. 2015 Jun;23(2):67-77. doi: 10.1177/1063426614532690.

DOI:10.1177/1063426614532690
PMID:26316681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4548959/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the benefits of a multiple family group (MFG) service delivery model compared with services as usual (SAU) in improving the functioning of youth with oppositional defiant/conduct disorder in families residing in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Participants included 320 youth aged 7 to 11 and their families who were referred to participating outpatient clinics. Participants were assigned to the MFG or the SAU condition, with parent report of child oppositional behavior, social competence, and level of youth impairment as primary outcomes at post-treatment. Family engagement to MFG was measured by attendance to each group session. Caregivers of youth in the MFG service delivery model condition reported significant improvement in youth oppositional behavior and social competence compared with youth in the SAU condition. Impairment improved over time for both groups with no difference between treatment conditions. The MFG led to greater percentage of youth with clinically significant improvements in oppositional behavior. Attendance to the MFG was high, given the high-risk nature of the study population. The MFG service delivery model offers an efficient and engaging format to implement evidence-based approaches to improving functioning of youth with oppositional defiant and/or conduct disorder in families from socioeconomically disadvantaged communities.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定与常规服务(SAU)相比,多家庭小组(MFG)服务提供模式在改善社会经济弱势社区家庭中患有对立违抗/品行障碍的青少年功能方面的益处。参与者包括320名7至11岁的青少年及其家庭,他们被转介到参与研究的门诊诊所。参与者被分配到MFG组或SAU组,以家长报告的儿童对立行为、社会能力和青少年功能受损程度作为治疗后的主要结果。通过参加每组会议来衡量家庭对MFG的参与度。与SAU组的青少年相比,MFG服务提供模式组的青少年照顾者报告说,青少年的对立行为和社会能力有显著改善。随着时间的推移,两组的功能受损情况均有所改善,治疗条件之间没有差异。MFG导致对立行为有临床显著改善的青少年比例更高。鉴于研究人群的高风险性质,MFG的参与率很高。MFG服务提供模式提供了一种高效且引人入胜的形式,以实施基于证据的方法来改善社会经济弱势社区家庭中患有对立违抗和/或品行障碍的青少年的功能。