Davison James A, Potvin Richard
Wolfe Eye Clinic, Marshalltown, IA, USA.
Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2015 Aug 19;9:1511-7. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S88693. eCollection 2015.
To determine whether the total corneal refractive power (TCRP) value, which is based on measurement of both anterior and posterior corneal astigmatism, is effective for toric intraocular lens (IOL) calculation with AcrySof(®) Toric IOLs.
A consecutive series of cataract surgery cases with AcrySof toric IOL implantation was studied retrospectively. The IOLMaster(®) was used for calculation of IOL sphere, the Pentacam(®) TCRP 3.0 mm apex/ring value was used as the keratometry input to the AcrySof Toric IOL Calculator and the VERION™ Digital Marker for surgical orientation. The keratometry readings from the VERION reference unit were recorded but not used in the actual calculation. Vector differences between expected and actual residual refractive cylinder were calculated and compared to simulated vector errors using the collected VERION keratometry data.
In total, 83 eyes of 56 patients were analyzed. Residual refractive cylinder was 0.25 D or lower in 58% of eyes and 0.5 D or lower in 80% of eyes. The TCRP-based calculation resulted in a statistically significantly lower vector error (P<0.01) and significantly more eyes with a vector error ≤0.5 D relative to the VERION-based calculation (P=0.02). The TCRP and VERION keratometry readings suggested a different IOL toric power in 53/83 eyes. In these 53 eyes the TCRP vector error was lower in 28 cases, the VERION error was lower in five cases, and the error was equal in 20 cases. When the anterior cornea had with-the-rule astigmatism, the VERION was more likely to suggest a higher toric power and when the anterior cornea had against-the-rule astigmatism, the VERION was less likely to suggest a higher toric power.
Using the TCRP keratometry measurement in the AcrySof toric calculator may improve overall postoperative refractive results. Consideration of measured posterior corneal astigmatism, rather than a population-averaged value, appears advantageous.
确定基于测量角膜前后散光的总角膜屈光力(TCRP)值在使用AcrySof(®)散光型人工晶状体(IOL)进行散光型IOL计算时是否有效。
对一系列连续的接受AcrySof散光型IOL植入的白内障手术病例进行回顾性研究。使用IOLMaster(®)计算IOL球镜度数,将Pentacam(®)TCRP 3.0 mm顶点/环数值作为角膜曲率计输入值输入AcrySof散光型IOL计算器,并使用VERION™数字标记进行手术定位。记录VERION参考单元的角膜曲率计读数,但不用于实际计算。计算预期和实际残余屈光柱镜之间的矢量差异,并与使用收集的VERION角膜曲率计数据模拟的矢量误差进行比较。
共分析了56例患者的83只眼。58%的眼睛残余屈光柱镜为0.25 D或更低,80%的眼睛为0.5 D或更低。与基于VERION的计算相比,基于TCRP的计算导致矢量误差在统计学上显著更低(P<0.01),且矢量误差≤0.5 D的眼睛明显更多(P=0.02)。TCRP和VERION角膜曲率计读数在83只眼中的53只眼中提示了不同的IOL散光度数。在这53只眼中,28例TCRP矢量误差更低,5例VERION误差更低,20例误差相等。当前角膜为顺规散光时,VERION更有可能提示更高的散光度数;当前角膜为逆规散光时,VERION提示更高散光度数的可能性较小。
在AcrySof散光型计算器中使用TCRP角膜曲率测量可能会改善总体术后屈光结果。考虑测量的后角膜散光,而不是群体平均值,似乎具有优势。