• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

创伤中目击性误吸:发生率高,发病率低——一项前瞻性分析

Witnessed aspiration in trauma: Frequent occurrence, rare morbidity--A prospective analysis.

作者信息

Benjamin Elizabeth, Haltmeier Tobias, Chouliaras Konstantinos, Siboni Stefano, Durso Joseph, Inaba Kenji, Demetriades Demetrios

机构信息

From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):1030-6; discussion 1036-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000704.

DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000000704
PMID:26317816
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aspiration events (AEs) are a well-recognized complication in trauma patients and have traditionally been considered a risk factor for pneumonia. Despite this, there is no consensus on the incidence or clinical significance of AE in the trauma population.

METHODS

All patients admitted as trauma team activations at our Level I trauma center who were intubated in the field or on arrival from September 2013 to August 2014 were prospectively collected. Field and admission data including witnessed AEs were analyzed. Additional hospital data included imaging, associated injuries, laboratory, and clinical data. Early respiratory failure, pneumonia, and hospital mortality were collected.

RESULTS

During the study period, 228 patients met inclusion criteria. Median age was 35.5 years, and Injury Severity Score (ISS) was 21.0. Overall, 58 patients (25.4%) had witnessed AEs. Patients with AE had significantly higher ISS (26.0 vs. 17.0, p = 0.027) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score on admission (median, 4.0 vs. 7.0; p = 0.003), despite similar field GCS score (p = 0.946). Body mass index (median, 27.2 vs. 26.2; p = 0.374) and intoxication rates (86.2% vs. 83.5%, p = 0.835) were similar between groups. Early pneumonia and respiratory failure were rare in all patients and were not higher in those with AE. Although mortality was higher after AE in patients who died directly after admission (51.7% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.004), in patients who survived to intensive care unit admission, there was no longer a difference between groups and aspiration was not an independent predictor of mortality (p = 0.107) on multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

The rate of aspiration in trauma is high and more likely to occur in patients with increased injury burden or depressed GCS score. In patients who survive past admission, early pneumonia rates are similar, regardless of AE. These data suggest that aspiration is a marker of severe illness and is associated with but not an independent predictor of mortality.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic/epidemiologic study, level III.

摘要

背景

误吸事件(AEs)是创伤患者中一种公认的并发症,传统上被认为是肺炎的危险因素。尽管如此,关于创伤人群中误吸事件的发生率或临床意义尚无共识。

方法

前瞻性收集了2013年9月至2014年8月期间在我们的一级创伤中心因创伤团队启动而入院、在现场或到达时接受插管的所有患者。分析了包括目击误吸事件在内的现场和入院数据。其他医院数据包括影像学、相关损伤、实验室和临床数据。收集早期呼吸衰竭、肺炎和医院死亡率。

结果

在研究期间,228例患者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为35.5岁,损伤严重程度评分(ISS)为21.0。总体而言,58例患者(25.4%)发生了目击误吸事件。误吸事件患者的ISS显著更高(26.0对17.0,p = 0.027),入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分更低(中位数,4.0对7.0;p = 0.003),尽管现场GCS评分相似(p = 0.946)。两组间体重指数(中位数,27.2对26.2;p = 0.374)和中毒率(86.2%对83.5%,p = 0.835)相似。所有患者中早期肺炎和呼吸衰竭很少见,误吸事件患者中也不更高。尽管入院后直接死亡的患者中误吸事件后的死亡率更高(51.7%对30.0%,p = 0.004),但在存活至重症监护病房入院的患者中,两组间不再有差异,多变量回归分析显示误吸不是死亡率的独立预测因素(p = 0.107)。

结论

创伤中误吸发生率很高,更易发生于损伤负担增加或GCS评分降低的患者。在入院后存活的患者中,无论是否发生误吸事件,早期肺炎发生率相似。这些数据表明误吸是重症的一个标志,与死亡率相关但不是死亡率的独立预测因素。

证据水平

预后/流行病学研究,三级。

相似文献

1
Witnessed aspiration in trauma: Frequent occurrence, rare morbidity--A prospective analysis.创伤中目击性误吸:发生率高,发病率低——一项前瞻性分析
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):1030-6; discussion 1036-7. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000704.
2
Risk factors for delirium in older trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit.入住外科重症监护病房的老年创伤患者发生谵妄的危险因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Dec;77(6):944-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000427.
3
Is ventilator-associated pneumonia in trauma patients an epiphenomenon or a cause of death?创伤患者的呼吸机相关性肺炎是一种附带现象还是死亡原因?
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2004 Fall;5(3):237-42. doi: 10.1089/sur.2004.5.237.
4
High incidence of post-injury pneumonia in intensive care-treated trauma patients.重症监护治疗的创伤患者术后肺炎发病率高。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Aug;57(7):848-54. doi: 10.1111/aas.12111. Epub 2013 Mar 31.
5
Endotracheal intubation in the field does not improve outcome in trauma patients who present without an acutely lethal traumatic brain injury.对于没有急性致命性创伤性脑损伤的创伤患者,现场气管插管并不能改善其预后。
J Trauma. 2003 Feb;54(2):307-11. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000046252.97590.BE.
6
Patients with severe traumatic brain injury transferred to a Level I or II trauma center: United States, 2007 to 2009.2007 年至 2009 年期间,严重创伤性脑损伤患者转送至一级或二级创伤中心:美国。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1491-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182782675.
7
Gender disparity in ventilator-associated pneumonia following trauma: identifying risk factors for mortality.创伤后呼吸机相关性肺炎的性别差异:确定死亡率的危险因素。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Jul;77(1):161-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000251.
8
Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma.输血与创伤患者预后较差相关,且与休克严重程度无关。
J Trauma. 2003 May;54(5):898-905; discussion 905-7. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000060261.10597.5C.
9
The impact of implementing a 24/7 open trauma bed protocol in the surgical intensive care unit on throughput and outcomes.24/7 开放创伤床位协议在外科重症监护病房对吞吐量和结果的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):97-101. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31829849e5.
10
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Children With Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: National Trauma Data Bank-Based Review of Outcomes.儿童严重创伤性脑损伤的颅内压监测:基于国家创伤数据库的结局回顾性研究。
JAMA Surg. 2014 Jun;149(6):544-8. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.4329.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Trauma and Intensive Care (ERATIC): Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) and International Association for Trauma Surgery and Intensive Care (IATSIC) Society Recommendations: Paper 2: Postoperative and Intensive Care Recommendations.创伤与重症监护强化康复指南(ERATIC):外科手术强化康复(ERAS)与国际创伤外科与重症监护协会(IATSIC)学会推荐意见:论文2:术后及重症监护推荐意见
World J Surg. 2025 Aug;49(8):2029-2054. doi: 10.1002/wjs.70004. Epub 2025 Jul 22.
2
Machine learning predictive model for aspiration risk in early enteral nutrition patients with severe acute pancreatitis.重症急性胰腺炎早期肠内营养患者误吸风险的机器学习预测模型
Heliyon. 2024 Nov 17;10(23):e40236. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40236. eCollection 2024 Dec 15.
3
A simple nomogram for predicting aspiration associated with dysphagia in hospitalized patients after stroke.用于预测卒中后住院患者吞咽困难相关误吸的简易列线图。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jun;45(6):2729-2736. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07312-2. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
4
Risk factors of aspiration occurrence with different feeding patterns in elderly intensive care unit patients: a cross-sectional study.老年重症监护病房患者不同喂养方式下误吸发生的危险因素:一项横断面研究
J Thorac Dis. 2023 May 30;15(5):2585-2600. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-430. Epub 2023 May 8.
5
Aspiration Risk Factors in Hospitalized Patients Following Trauma.创伤后住院患者的误吸危险因素
Kans J Med. 2022 May 17;15(2):184-188. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol15.15775. eCollection 2022.
6
Trauma in Obstetrical Patients.产科患者的创伤
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2021 Oct-Dec;14(4):216-221. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_176_20. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
7
Endotracheal intubation to reduce aspiration events in acutely comatose patients: a systematic review.经口气管插管以降低昏迷患者吸入性事件的发生:一项系统评价。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Dec 10;28(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00814-w.
8
Tracheal intubation in traumatic brain injury: a multicentre prospective observational study.颅脑损伤患者的气管插管:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究。
Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):505-517. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.05.067. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
9
Risk of pneumonia in patients with isolated minor rib fractures: a nationwide cohort study.孤立性肋骨骨折患者的肺炎风险:一项全国性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Jan 13;7(1):e013029. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013029.