• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“是”与“否”及选择任务中的刺激-反应对应关系:无关显著物体的存在会改变反应吗?

Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?

作者信息

Lien Mei-Ching, Pedersen Logan, Proctor Robert W

机构信息

School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, 97331-5303, USA.

Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.

出版信息

Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):912-934. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0699-0. Epub 2015 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1007/s00426-015-0699-0
PMID:26318437
Abstract

In 2-choice tasks, responses are faster when stimulus location corresponds to response location, even when stimulus location is irrelevant. Dolk et al. (J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39:1248-1260, 2013a) found this stimulus-response correspondence effect with a single response location in a go-nogo task when an irrelevant Japanese waving cat was present. They argued that salient objects trigger spatial coding of the response relative to that object. We examined this claim using both behavioral and lateralized readiness potential (LRP) measures. In Experiment 1 participants determined the pitch of a left- or right-positioned tone, whereas in Experiment 2 they determined the color of a dot within a centrally located hand pointing left, right, or straight ahead. In both experiments, participants performed a go-nogo task with the right-index finger and a 2-choice task with both index fingers, with a left-positioned Japanese waving cat present or absent. For the go-nogo task, the cat induced a correspondence effect on response times (RT) to the tones (Experiment 1) but not the visual stimuli (Experiment 2). For the 2-choice task, a correspondence effect was evident in all conditions in both experiments. Cat's presence/absence did not significantly modulate the effect for right and left responses, although there was a trend toward increased RT and LRP for right responses in Experiment 1. The results imply that a salient, irrelevant object could provide a reference frame for response coding when attention is available to process it, as is likely in an auditory task (Experiment 1) but not a visual task (Experiment 2).

摘要

在二选一任务中,即使刺激位置无关紧要,当刺激位置与反应位置相对应时,反应速度会更快。多尔克等人(《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》39:1248 - 1260,2013a)发现在一个有/无任务中,当存在一只无关的日本招手猫时,对于单一反应位置会出现这种刺激 - 反应对应效应。他们认为显著物体触发了相对于该物体的反应的空间编码。我们使用行为测量和侧化准备电位(LRP)测量来检验这一说法。在实验1中,参与者判断位于左侧或右侧的音调的音高,而在实验2中,他们判断位于中央的手向左、向右或向前指时其中一个点的颜色。在两个实验中,参与者用右手食指执行有/无任务,并用两只食指执行二选一任务,同时呈现或不呈现位于左侧的日本招手猫。对于有/无任务,猫对音调的反应时间(RT)产生了对应效应(实验1),但对视觉刺激没有产生对应效应(实验2)。对于二选一任务,在两个实验的所有条件下都明显存在对应效应。猫的存在与否并没有显著调节左右反应的效应,尽管在实验1中,右侧反应的反应时间和LRP有增加的趋势。结果表明,当注意力可用于处理时,一个显著的无关物体可以为反应编码提供一个参考框架,这在听觉任务(实验1)中可能是这样,但在视觉任务(实验2)中并非如此。

相似文献

1
Stimulus-response correspondence in go-nogo and choice tasks: Are reactions altered by the presence of an irrelevant salient object?“是”与“否”及选择任务中的刺激-反应对应关系:无关显著物体的存在会改变反应吗?
Psychol Res. 2016 Nov;80(6):912-934. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0699-0. Epub 2015 Aug 30.
2
An electrophysiological study of the object-based correspondence effect: is the effect triggered by an intended grasping action?基于物体的对应效应的电生理研究:该效应是否由预期的抓握动作触发?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1862-82. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0523-0.
3
Auditory stimulus-response compatibility: is there a contribution of stimulus-hand correspondence?听觉刺激-反应兼容性:刺激与手部的对应关系是否有影响?
Psychol Res. 2000;63(2):148-58. doi: 10.1007/pl00008173.
4
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
5
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.你真的代表我的任务吗?对意外事件的序列适应效应支持联合西蒙效应的参照编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
6
Attention-shift vs. response-priming explanations for the spatial cueing effect in cross-modal tasks.跨模态任务中空间线索效应的注意转移与反应启动解释
Scand J Psychol. 2016 Jun;57(3):185-92. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12279. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
7
The role of instructions, practice, and stimulus-hand correspondence on the Simon effect.说明、练习及刺激-反应对应关系对西蒙效应的作用。
Psychol Res. 2003 Feb;67(1):43-55. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0107-4. Epub 2002 Sep 7.
8
Correspondence effects for objects with opposing left and right protrusions.具有相反左右突出物的物体的对应效果。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2011 Jun;37(3):737-49. doi: 10.1037/a0021934.
9
The usefulness of partial information: effects of go probability in the choice/Nogo task.部分信息的有用性:围棋概率在选择/不选择任务中的影响。
Psychophysiology. 1999 May;36(3):288-97. doi: 10.1017/s0048577299980332.
10
Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.手柄方位效应中的关键自下而上注意因素:非对称亮度瞬变和注视点相对于目标中心的偏心度。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1685-1705. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01329-w. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Action Postponing and Restraint Varies among Sensory Modalities.行动延迟和抑制在不同感觉模态之间存在差异。
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 11;12(11):1530. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111530.
2
Spatial auditory presentation of a partner's presence induces the social Simon effect.伴侣在场的空间听觉呈现会引起社会西蒙效应。
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 4;12(1):5637. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09628-5.
3
The effect of grasp compatibility in go/no-go and two-choice tasks.在“go/no-go”和“二选一”任务中抓握兼容性的影响。

本文引用的文献

1
Referential coding of steering-wheel button presses in a simulated driving cockpit.模拟驾驶座舱中方向盘按钮按压的参照编码
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2015 Dec;21(4):418-28. doi: 10.1037/xap0000060. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
2
Interacting hands: the role of attention for the joint Simon effect.相互作用的手部动作:注意力对联合西蒙效应的作用
Front Psychol. 2014 Dec 17;5:1462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01462. eCollection 2014.
3
The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration.联合西蒙效应:综述与理论整合。
Mem Cognit. 2019 Aug;47(6):1076-1087. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00917-5.
4
Sharing Different Reference Frames: How Stimulus Setup and Task Setup Shape Egocentric and Allocentric Simon Effects.共享不同的参考框架:刺激设置和任务设置如何塑造自我中心和异我中心西蒙效应。
Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 30;9:2063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02063. eCollection 2018.
5
The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.多模态停止信号西蒙效应:表明在停止信号西蒙范式中刺激特征的相关性对事件表征和任务表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011. eCollection 2018.
6
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
7
The influence of passionate love on self-other discrimination during joint action.激情之爱对共同行动中自我-他人区分的影响。
Psychol Res. 2020 Feb;84(1):51-61. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-0981-z. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
8
The influence of the Japanese waving cat on the joint spatial compatibility effect: A replication and extension of Dolk, Hommel, Prinz, and Liepelt (2013).日本招财猫对关节空间兼容性效应的影响:对多尔克、霍梅尔、普林茨和利佩尔特(2013年)的一项重复研究及拓展
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 14;12(9):e0184844. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184844. eCollection 2017.
9
No evidence of task co-representation in a joint Stroop task.在联合 Stroop 任务中没有任务共同表现的证据。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):852-862. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0909-z. Epub 2017 Aug 29.
Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 5;5:974. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974. eCollection 2014.
4
Prediction in joint action: what, when, and where.联合行动中的预测:是什么、何时以及何地。
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Apr;1(2):353-67. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01024.x.
5
Analyzing distributional properties of interference effects across modalities: chances and challenges.分析跨模态干扰效应的分布特性:机遇与挑战。
Psychol Res. 2014;78(3):387-99. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0551-y. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
6
The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects.无关位置信息对表现的影响:西蒙和空间斯特鲁普效应综述。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207. doi: 10.3758/BF03210959.
7
Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect.按键与位置:联合空间兼容性效应背后的空间反应编码
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2013 Nov;75(8):1725-36. doi: 10.3758/s13414-013-0524-z.
8
Visual experience determines the use of external reference frames in joint action control.视觉体验决定了在联合动作控制中使用外部参照系。
PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e59008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059008. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
9
The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account.非社会性西蒙效应:一种参照编码解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Oct;39(5):1248-60. doi: 10.1037/a0031031. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
10
Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.社会西蒙任务中空间显著性的增强:空间兼容性效应的反应编码解释。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jul;74(5):911-29. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0304-1.