Rodrigues Ana Cristina, Haven Mai Østergaard, Lindedam Jane, Felby Claus, Gama Miguel
Centre of Biological Engineering, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal.
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark; DONG Energy A/S, Kraftværksvej 53, DK-7000 Fredericia, Denmark.
Enzyme Microb Technol. 2015 Nov;79-80:70-7. doi: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2015.06.019. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
The hydrolysis/fermentation of wheat straw and the adsorption/desorption/deactivation of cellulases were studied using Cellic(®) CTec2 (Cellic) and Celluclast mixed with Novozyme 188. The distribution of enzymes - cellobiohydrolase I (Cel7A), endoglucanase I (Cel7B) and β-glucosidase - of the two formulations between the residual substrate and supernatant during the course of enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation was investigated. The potential of recyclability using alkaline wash was also studied. The efficiency of hydrolysis with an enzyme load of 10 FPU/g cellulose reached >98% using Cellic(®) CTec2, while for Celluclast a conversion of 52% and 81%, was observed without and with β-glucosidase supplementation, respectively. The decrease of Cellic(®) CTec2 activity observed along the process was related to deactivation of Cel7A rather than of Cel7B and β-glucosidase. The adsorption/desorption profiles during hydrolysis/fermentation revealed that a large fraction of active enzymes remained adsorbed to the solid residue throughout the process. Surprisingly, this was the case of Cel7A and β-glucosidase from Cellic, which remained adsorbed to the solid fraction along the entire process. Alkaline washing was used to recover the enzymes from the solid residue. This method allowed efficient recovery of Celluclast enzymes; however, this may be achieved only when minor amounts of cellulose remain present. Regarding the Cellic formulation, neither the presence of cellulose nor lignin restricted an efficient desorption of the enzymes at alkaline pH. This work shows that the recycling strategy must be customized for each particular formulation, since the enzymes found e.g. in Cellic and Celluclast bear quite different behaviour regarding the solid-liquid distribution, stability and cellulose and lignin affinity.
使用Cellic(®) CTec2(纤维素酶)和与诺维信188混合的纤维素酶复合物研究了小麦秸秆的水解/发酵以及纤维素酶的吸附/解吸/失活。研究了在酶水解和发酵过程中,两种配方中的酶——纤维二糖水解酶I(Cel7A)、内切葡聚糖酶I(Cel7B)和β-葡萄糖苷酶——在残留底物和上清液之间的分布情况。还研究了使用碱性洗涤进行回收利用的潜力。使用Cellic(®) CTec2时,酶负载量为10 FPU/g纤维素时水解效率达到>98%,而对于纤维素酶复合物,在不添加和添加β-葡萄糖苷酶的情况下,转化率分别为52%和81%。在整个过程中观察到的Cellic(®) CTec2活性的下降与Cel7A的失活有关,而不是与Cel7B和β-葡萄糖苷酶有关。水解/发酵过程中的吸附/解吸曲线表明,在整个过程中,大部分活性酶仍吸附在固体残渣上。令人惊讶的是,来自Cellic的Cel7A和β-葡萄糖苷酶就是这种情况,它们在整个过程中都吸附在固体部分。使用碱性洗涤从固体残渣中回收酶。这种方法可以有效地回收纤维素酶复合物中的酶;然而,只有当残留少量纤维素时才能实现。对于Cellic配方,无论是纤维素还是木质素的存在都不会限制在碱性pH下酶的有效解吸。这项工作表明,回收策略必须针对每种特定配方进行定制,因为例如在Cellic和纤维素酶复合物中发现的酶在固液分布、稳定性以及对纤维素和木质素的亲和力方面表现出相当不同的行为。