• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2014年英格兰的专科心理健康服务:资金、可及性及护理水平概述

Specialist mental health services in England in 2014: overview of funding, access and levels of care.

作者信息

Docherty Mary, Thornicroft Graham

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK ; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Health Service and Population Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF UK.

出版信息

Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Aug 30;9:34. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0023-9. eCollection 2015.

DOI:10.1186/s13033-015-0023-9
PMID:26322123
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4553216/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since the economic recession began in 2008 anecdotal reports suggest that mental health services in England have experienced disinvestment, but published data to test this proposition are few.

METHOD

This paper presents information from a wider range of official, research and grey literature sources aiming to: (1) assess whether governmental investment in publically funded mental health services has declined since the start of the economic recession in 2008; (2) to assess whether relative changes in mental health service investment over this period were or were not similar to trends in national investment in services for people with physical disorders, and (3) to interpret these findings in terms of met and unmet population levels needs for mental health care.

RESULTS

The key findings are that: across England social service expenditure reductions have led to a decrease of 48 % in the number of people with mental illness who receive such care, while direct NHS expenditure was reduced in some local areas by up to 32 %.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this overview suggest that there have been substantial reductions in the resources dedicated to mental health treatment and care in England since 2008, that such reductions seem not to have been applied to physical health services, and that these findings appear to run counter to the government policy of 'parity of esteem; for mental and physical healthcare.

摘要

背景

自2008年经济衰退开始以来,有传闻称英格兰的心理健康服务遭遇了投资减少的情况,但用于验证这一说法的公开数据却很少。

方法

本文展示了来自更广泛的官方、研究及灰色文献来源的信息,旨在:(1)评估自2008年经济衰退开始以来,政府对公共资助的心理健康服务的投资是否有所下降;(2)评估在此期间心理健康服务投资的相对变化与国家对身体疾病患者服务投资的趋势是否相似;(3)根据满足和未满足的人群心理健康护理需求来解读这些发现。

结果

主要发现为:在英格兰,社会服务支出的减少导致接受此类护理的精神疾病患者数量减少了48%,而在一些地区,国民医疗服务体系(NHS)的直接支出减少了高达32%。

结论

本综述结果表明,自2008年以来,英格兰用于心理健康治疗和护理的资源大幅减少,这种减少似乎并未应用于身体健康服务,而且这些发现似乎与政府关于心理健康和身体健康护理“同等重视”的政策相悖。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/4bb1d35e976d/13033_2015_23_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/9e6337669ae0/13033_2015_23_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/6bb87f17869d/13033_2015_23_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/0c845e0d02be/13033_2015_23_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/4bb1d35e976d/13033_2015_23_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/9e6337669ae0/13033_2015_23_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/6bb87f17869d/13033_2015_23_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/0c845e0d02be/13033_2015_23_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f66/4553216/4bb1d35e976d/13033_2015_23_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Specialist mental health services in England in 2014: overview of funding, access and levels of care.2014年英格兰的专科心理健康服务:资金、可及性及护理水平概述
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2015 Aug 30;9:34. doi: 10.1186/s13033-015-0023-9. eCollection 2015.
2
Integration, effectiveness and costs of different models of primary health care provision for people who are homeless: an evaluation study.为无家可归者提供不同模式的基层医疗服务的整合、效果和成本:一项评估研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Oct;11(16):1-217. doi: 10.3310/WXUW5103.
3
4
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
5
Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation.调查英格兰“大地方”社区赋权计划对健康和社会结果的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(9):1-147. doi: 10.3310/GRMA6711.
6
What happens after an NHS Health Check? A survey and realist review.NHS 健康检查后会发生什么?一项调查和现实主义综述。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Jul;11(12):1-133. doi: 10.3310/RGTH4127.
7
Provision of NHS generalist and specialist services to care homes in England: review of surveys.为英格兰养老院提供国民保健服务体系的全科和专科服务:调查综述
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2016 Mar;17(2):122-37. doi: 10.1017/S1463423615000250. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
9
Increased Mental Health Treatment Financing, Community-Based Organization's Treatment Programs, and Latino-White Children's Financing Disparities.心理健康治疗资金增加、基于社区组织的治疗项目以及拉丁裔与白人儿童的资金差距。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2017 Sep 1;20(3):137-145.
10
Investment in Australian mental health carer services: how much and does it reflect evidence of effectiveness?对澳大利亚心理健康护理者服务的投资:规模多大,是否反映了有效性证据?
Aust Health Rev. 2020 Feb;44(1):104-113. doi: 10.1071/AH18065.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring adolescents' and stakeholders' perceptions of online and school-based mental health provision.探索青少年及利益相关者对在线和校内心理健康服务的看法。
JCPP Adv. 2024 Nov 27;4(4):e12288. doi: 10.1002/jcv2.12288. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
"They pulled that funding away and we're not recovering. it's getting worse": deaths of despair in post-austerity north east England.“他们取消了这笔资金,我们无法恢复。情况越来越糟”:后紧缩时代英格兰东北部的绝望死亡。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Nov 19;23(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02334-w.
3
Population density and receipt of care for common mental disorders: a cross-sectional analysis of English household data from the 2014 Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the impact of mental health-related stigma on help-seeking? A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.与心理健康相关的污名对寻求帮助有何影响?对定量和定性研究的系统评价。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jan;45(1):11-27. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714000129. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
2
The mental health consequences of the recession: economic hardship and employment of people with mental health problems in 27 European countries.经济衰退对精神健康的影响:27 个欧洲国家精神健康问题人群的经济困难和就业状况。
PLoS One. 2013 Jul 26;8(7):e69792. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0069792. Print 2013.
3
The gap in life expectancy from preventable physical illness in psychiatric patients in Western Australia: retrospective analysis of population based registers.
人口密度与常见精神障碍的医疗服务获取:2014 年英国成人精神疾病调查的横断面数据分析。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 23;14(5):e078635. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078635.
4
Feasibility, Perceived Impact, and Acceptability of a Socially Assistive Robot to Support Emotion Regulation With Highly Anxious University Students: Mixed Methods Open Trial.社交辅助机器人支持高度焦虑大学生情绪调节的可行性、感知影响及可接受性:混合方法开放性试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2023 Oct 31;10:e46826. doi: 10.2196/46826.
5
How is return on investment from quality improvement programmes conceptualised by mental healthcare leaders and why: a qualitative study.精神卫生保健领导者如何从概念上理解改善项目的投资回报率,以及为什么要这样理解:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09911-9.
6
Trends in Psychological Distress Among Adults in England, 2020-2022.2020-2022 年英格兰成年人心理困扰趋势。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321959. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21959.
7
Assessing and Responding to Suicide Risk in Children and Young People: Understanding Views and Experiences of Helpline Staff.评估和应对儿童和青少年的自杀风险:了解热线工作人员的观点和经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 1;19(17):10887. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710887.
8
A Qualitative Scoping Review of the Impacts of Economic Recessions on Mental Health: Implications for Practice and Policy.经济衰退对心理健康影响的定性范围综述:对实践和政策的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 May 13;19(10):5937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19105937.
9
The Peterborough Exemplar: a protocol to evaluate the impact and implementation of a new patient-centred, system-wide community mental healthcare model in England.彼得伯勒模式:评估英格兰一种新的以患者为中心、全系统社区精神卫生保健模式的影响和实施情况的方案。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2022 Feb 5;20(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12961-022-00819-0.
10
Care co-ordinator in my pocket': a feasibility study of mobile assessment and therapy for psychosis (TechCare).“口袋里的护理协调员”:精神病移动评估和治疗的可行性研究(TechCare)。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 16;11(11):e046755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046755.
澳大利亚西部精神疾病患者因可预防的身体疾病导致的预期寿命差距:基于人群登记的回顾性分析。
BMJ. 2013 May 21;346:f2539. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2539.
4
Trends in population mental health before and after the 2008 recession: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the 1991-2010 Health Surveys of England.2008 年经济衰退前后人口心理健康趋势:英格兰 1991-2010 年健康调查的重复横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2012 Oct 17;2(5). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001790. Print 2012.
5
Physical health disparities and mental illness: the scandal of premature mortality.身体健康差异与精神疾病:早逝的丑闻。
Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;199(6):441-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.092718.
6
Use of administrative data for the surveillance of mental disorders in 5 provinces.利用行政数据对5个省份的精神障碍进行监测。
Can J Psychiatry. 2009 Aug;54(8):571-5. doi: 10.1177/070674370905400810.
7
Disability and treatment of specific mental and physical disorders across the world.全球特定精神和身体疾病的残疾情况及治疗
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 May;192(5):368-75. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.039107.
8
Improved investment in mental health services: value for money?改善心理健康服务投资:物有所值吗?
Br J Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;192(2):88-91. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.042879.
9
Resources for mental health: scarcity, inequity, and inefficiency.心理健康资源:稀缺、不平等与低效。
Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):878-89. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61239-2.
10
Crisis resolution/home treatment teams and psychiatric admission rates in England.英国的危机解决/居家治疗团队与精神科住院率
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;189:441-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.020362.