Suppr超能文献

重新审视熟悉度:自由回忆中的记住/知道判断

Rethinking Familiarity: Remember/Know Judgments in Free Recall.

作者信息

Mickes Laura, Seale-Carlisle Travis M, Wixted John T

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego.

出版信息

J Mem Lang. 2013 May 1;68(4):333-349. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.001.

Abstract

Although frequently used with recognition, a few studies have used the Remember/Know procedure with free recall. In each case, participants gave Know judgments to a significant number of recalled items (items that were presumably not remembered on the basis of familiarity). What do these Know judgments mean? We investigated this issue using a source memory/free-recall procedure. For each word that was recalled, participants were asked to (a) make a confidence rating on a 5-point scale, (b) make a Remember/Know judgment, and (c) recollect a source detail. The large majority of both Remember judgments and Know judgments were made with high confidence and high accuracy, but source memory was nevertheless higher for Remember judgments than for Know judgments. These source memory results correspond to what is found using recognition, and they raise the possibility that Know judgments in free recall identify the cue-dependent retrieval of item-only information from an episodic memory search set. In agreement with this idea, we also found that the temporal dynamics of free recall were similar for high-confidence Remember and high-confidence Know judgments (as if both judgments reflected retrieval from the same search set). If Know judgments in free recall do in fact reflect the episodic retrieval of item-only information, it seems reasonable to suppose that the same might be true of high-confidence Know judgments in recognition. If so, then a longstanding debate about the role of the hippocampus in recollection and familiarity may have a natural resolution.

摘要

尽管“记住/知道”程序经常与再认一起使用,但也有一些研究将其用于自由回忆。在每种情况下,参与者对大量回忆出的项目(这些项目大概不是基于熟悉度而被记住的)做出了“知道”判断。这些“知道”判断是什么意思呢?我们使用源记忆/自由回忆程序对这个问题进行了研究。对于每个被回忆出的单词,要求参与者:(a) 在5点量表上做出信心评级;(b) 做出“记住/知道”判断;(c) 回忆一个源细节。绝大多数“记住”判断和“知道”判断都是在高信心和高准确性的情况下做出的,但源记忆对于“记住”判断而言仍然高于“知道”判断。这些源记忆结果与使用再认时所发现的结果一致,它们提出了一种可能性,即自由回忆中的“知道”判断识别出了从情景记忆搜索集中仅基于线索的项目信息检索。与此观点一致,我们还发现,高信心的“记住”判断和高信心的“知道”判断在自由回忆中的时间动态是相似的(就好像这两种判断都反映了从同一个搜索集中的检索)。如果自由回忆中的“知道”判断实际上确实反映了仅项目信息的情景检索,那么似乎有理由推测,再认中高信心的“知道”判断可能也是如此。如果是这样,那么关于海马体在回忆和熟悉度中作用的长期争论可能会有一个自然的解决方案。

相似文献

2
Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.记忆可能较弱,而熟悉感可能较强。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):325-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025483. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
5
Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.记忆/知晓判断探究回忆程度。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Mar;20(3):400-5. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20041.
7
Remember and know judgments during recognition in chronic schizophrenia.慢性精神分裂症识别过程中的记忆与认知判断。
Schizophr Res. 2008 Mar;100(1-3):181-90. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.021. Epub 2007 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

2
Recognition memory: The probe, the returned signal, and the decision.识别记忆:探针、返回信号和决策。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Apr;31(2):568-598. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01955-4. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

4
Recollective and Nonrecollective Recall.回忆性回忆与非回忆性回忆。
J Mem Lang. 2010 Oct;63(3):425-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.05.002.
7
Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.记忆可能较弱,而熟悉感可能较强。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):325-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025483. Epub 2011 Oct 3.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验