• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

我该停下还是继续?关联与期望的作用。

Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.

作者信息

Best Maisy, Lawrence Natalia S, Logan Gordon D, McLaren Ian P L, Verbruggen Frederick

机构信息

School of Psychology.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jan;42(1):115-37. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000116. Epub 2015 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1037/xhp0000116
PMID:26322688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4685931/
Abstract

Following exposure to consistent stimulus-stop mappings, response inhibition can become automatized with practice. What is learned is less clear, even though this has important theoretical and practical implications. A recent analysis indicates that stimuli can become associated with a stop signal or with a stop goal. Furthermore, expectancy may play an important role. Previous studies that have used stop or no-go signals to manipulate stimulus-stop learning cannot distinguish between stimulus-signal and stimulus-goal associations, and expectancy has not been measured properly. In the present study, participants performed a task that combined features of the go/no-go task and the stop-signal task in which the stop-signal rule changed at the beginning of each block. The go and stop signals were superimposed over 40 task-irrelevant images. Our results show that participants can learn direct associations between images and the stop goal without mediation via the stop signal. Exposure to the image-stop associations influenced task performance during training, and expectancies measured following task completion or measured within the task. But, despite this, we found an effect of stimulus-stop learning on test performance only when the task increased the task-relevance of the images. This could indicate that the influence of stimulus-stop learning on go performance is strongly influenced by attention to both task-relevant and task-irrelevant stimulus features. More generally, our findings suggest a strong interplay between automatic and controlled processes.

摘要

在接触一致的刺激-停止映射后,反应抑制可以通过练习而自动化。尽管这具有重要的理论和实践意义,但所学到的内容尚不清楚。最近的一项分析表明,刺激可以与停止信号或停止目标相关联。此外,预期可能起着重要作用。以往使用停止或不执行信号来操纵刺激-停止学习的研究无法区分刺激-信号和刺激-目标关联,并且预期也没有得到恰当测量。在本研究中,参与者执行了一项结合了执行/不执行任务和停止信号任务特征的任务,其中停止信号规则在每个组块开始时改变。执行信号和停止信号叠加在40张与任务无关的图像上。我们的结果表明,参与者可以在不通过停止信号介导的情况下学习图像与停止目标之间的直接关联。接触图像-停止关联会影响训练期间的任务表现,以及任务完成后或任务过程中测量的预期。但是,尽管如此,我们发现只有当任务增加了图像的任务相关性时,刺激-停止学习才会对测试表现产生影响。这可能表明刺激-停止学习对执行表现的影响受到对任务相关和任务无关刺激特征的关注的强烈影响。更一般地说,我们的研究结果表明自动过程和控制过程之间存在强烈的相互作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/faf6428f8792/xhp_42_1_115_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/2ae98f7433d3/xhp_42_1_115_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/eecb7befffc5/xhp_42_1_115_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/5428ee513b0e/xhp_42_1_115_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/176efdc0c111/xhp_42_1_115_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/01689b1d2786/xhp_42_1_115_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/faf6428f8792/xhp_42_1_115_fig6a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/2ae98f7433d3/xhp_42_1_115_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/eecb7befffc5/xhp_42_1_115_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/5428ee513b0e/xhp_42_1_115_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/176efdc0c111/xhp_42_1_115_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/01689b1d2786/xhp_42_1_115_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6424/4685931/faf6428f8792/xhp_42_1_115_fig6a.jpg

相似文献

1
Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies.我该停下还是继续?关联与期望的作用。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2016 Jan;42(1):115-37. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000116. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
2
"Should I stop or should I go? The role of associations and expectancies": Correction to Best et al. (2016).“我该停下还是继续?联想与预期的作用”:对贝斯特等人(2016年)的修正
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017 Feb;43(2):428. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000366.
3
Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigms.认知控制的自动性:反应抑制范式中的目标启动
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 Sep;35(5):1381-8. doi: 10.1037/a0016645.
4
Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigms.自动与受控反应抑制:在“选择/不选择”和“停止信号”范式中的联想学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 Nov;137(4):649-72. doi: 10.1037/a0013170.
5
Fore-period effect and stop-signal reaction time.前周期效应与停止信号反应时间。
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(2):305-9. doi: 10.1007/s00221-005-0110-2. Epub 2005 Nov 15.
6
Resisting distraction and response inhibition trigger similar enhancements of future performance.抵制干扰和反应抑制会引发未来表现的类似提升。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Oct;180:40-51. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.08.009. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task.与停止信号任务中成功和失败停止相关的事件相关电位成分。
Psychophysiology. 2004 Jan;41(1):9-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8986.2003.00127.x.
8
Stop task after-effects: the extent of slowing during the preparation and execution of movement.停止任务后效应:运动准备和执行过程中的减慢程度。
Exp Psychol. 2009;56(4):247-51. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.247.
9
Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.与斯特鲁普匹配和停止信号任务相关的抑制机制以及冲动性的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
Moderate acute alcohol use impairs intentional inhibition rather than stimulus-driven inhibition.适度急性饮酒会损害有意抑制而非刺激驱动抑制。
Psychol Res. 2021 Jun;85(4):1449-1461. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01353-w. Epub 2020 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Modality Matters: Fasted Individuals Inhibit Food Stimuli Better Than Neutral Stimuli for Words, but Not for Pictures.模态很重要:禁食个体对文字类食物刺激的抑制作用优于中性刺激,但对图片类则不然。
Nutrients. 2024 Jul 9;16(14):2190. doi: 10.3390/nu16142190.
2
The effect of task complexity on the neural network for response inhibition: An ALE meta-analysis.任务复杂性对反应抑制神经网络的影响:一项基于激活似然估计的荟萃分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024 Mar;158:105544. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105544. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
3
Explicit and Implicit Devaluation Effects of Food-Specific Response Inhibition Training.

本文引用的文献

1
Inhibitory control training for appetitive behaviour change: A meta-analytic investigation of mechanisms of action and moderators of effectiveness.用于改变食欲行为的抑制控制训练:作用机制与效果调节因素的元分析调查
Appetite. 2016 Feb 1;97:16-28. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Nov 26.
2
Associatively mediated stopping: Training stimulus-specific inhibitory control.联想介导的停止:训练特定刺激的抑制控制。
Learn Behav. 2016 Jun;44(2):162-74. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0196-8.
3
The Pervasive Problem With Placebos in Psychology: Why Active Control Groups Are Not Sufficient to Rule Out Placebo Effects.
特定食物反应抑制训练的显性和隐性贬值效应
J Cogn. 2023 Jan 17;6(1):10. doi: 10.5334/joc.256. eCollection 2023.
4
Partial response electromyography as a marker of action stopping.部分反应肌电图作为动作停止的标志物。
Elife. 2022 May 26;11:e70332. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70332.
5
Pilot study of food-specific go/no-go training for overweight individuals: brain imaging data suggest inhibition shapes food evaluation.超重人群食物特异性 Go/No-Go 训练的初步研究:脑成像数据表明抑制作用影响食物评价
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Feb 6;18(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsab137.
6
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Inhibitory Control Training for Smoking Cessation: Outcomes, Mediators and Methodological Considerations.戒烟抑制控制训练的随机对照试验:结果、中介因素及方法学考量
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 3;12:759270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.759270. eCollection 2021.
7
Exploring Strategies to Optimise the Impact of Food-Specific Inhibition Training on Children's Food Choices.探索优化特定食物抑制训练对儿童食物选择影响的策略。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 13;12:653610. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.653610. eCollection 2021.
8
Contiguity of proactive and reactive inhibitory brain areas: a cognitive model based on ALE meta-analyses.主动和反应性抑制脑区的连续性:基于 ALE 荟萃分析的认知模型。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Aug;15(4):2199-2214. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00369-5.
9
Does alcohol cue inhibitory control training survive a context shift?酒精线索抑制控制训练能否在情境转换中幸存下来?
Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Nov;34(7):783-792. doi: 10.1037/adb0000580. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
10
Does Learning Influence the Detection of Signals in a Response-Inhibition Task?学习是否会影响反应抑制任务中信号的检测?
J Cogn. 2019 Jul 31;2(1):19. doi: 10.5334/joc.73.
安慰剂在心理学中的普遍问题:为什么积极的对照组不足以排除安慰剂效应。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul;8(4):445-54. doi: 10.1177/1745691613491271.
4
Inhibitory control in mind and brain 2.0: blocked-input models of saccadic countermanding.心智与大脑中的抑制控制2.0:眼跳抑制的阻断输入模型
Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):115-47. doi: 10.1037/a0038893. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
Stopping to food can reduce intake. Effects of stimulus-specificity and individual differences in dietary restraint.停止进食会减少摄入量。刺激特异性和饮食节制中个体差异的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Feb;85:91-103. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2014.11.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
6
Banishing the Control Homunculi in Studies of Action Control and Behavior Change.消除行动控制与行为改变研究中的控制小人
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014 Sep;9(5):497-524. doi: 10.1177/1745691614526414.
7
Stimulus devaluation induced by stopping action.停止动作引发的刺激贬值。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Dec;143(6):2316-29. doi: 10.1037/xge0000022. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
8
Is the effect of aerobic exercise on cognition a placebo effect?有氧运动对认知的影响是一种安慰剂效应吗?
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 7;9(10):e109557. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109557. eCollection 2014.
9
The inhibitory control reflex.抑制性控制反射。
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:263-78. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
10
Proactive and reactive stopping when distracted: an attentional account.分心时的主动和被动停止:一种注意力解释。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Aug;40(4):1295-300. doi: 10.1037/a0036542. Epub 2014 May 19.