• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

纽约市骑自行车者与技术相关的分心骑行行为及头盔使用情况分析

An Analysis of Technology-Related Distracted Biking Behaviors and Helmet Use Among Cyclists in New York City.

作者信息

Ethan Danna, Basch Corey H, Johnson Glen D, Hammond Rodney, Chow Ching Man, Varsos Victoria

机构信息

Health Education and Promotion, Department of Health Sciences, Lehman College, The City University of New York, 250 Bedford Park Boulevard West, Gillet Hall, Room 334, Bronx, NY, 10468, USA.

William Paterson University, Wayne, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):138-45. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0079-0.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-015-0079-0
PMID:26323983
Abstract

Bicycling is becoming an increasingly utilized mode of transportation in New York City. Technology-related distracted bicycling and helmet use are behaviors that can impact bike safety. The aims of this study were twofold: (1) to determine rates and types of technology-related distracted behaviors among bicyclists in the borough of Manhattan in New York City; and (2) to assess the rate of bicycle helmet use among these cyclists. Bicyclists in five popular riding areas in Manhattan were observed for a total of 50 h using a digital video camera during summer months in 2014. Videos were coded and enumerated for the total number and gender of cyclists, type of bicycle, number wearing headphones/earbuds and/or using a mobile phone, and whether the cyclist was wearing a helmet. Almost 25,000 cyclists were observed across the five selected locations (n = 24,861). Riders were almost four times more likely not to wear a helmet on rental bikes as compared with non-rentals (Citi Bike(®) OR 3.8; 95% CI 2.5, 5.9: other rental OR 3.8; 95% CI 3.0, 4.9). Significantly increased odds of not wearing a helmet were observed for females relative to males (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.1, 1.8) across varied times and locations. Overall, rates of technology-related distraction were low, with headphone use being most prevalent. Males were more likely to wear headphones/earbuds (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.4, 2.9), as were cyclists on Citi Bikes relative to other rental bikes (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.3, 3.6). Findings from this study contribute to the growing literature on distracted biking and helmet use among bike share program riders and other cyclists and can inform policymakers and program planners aiming to improve bicycle safety in urban settings.

摘要

在纽约市,骑自行车正日益成为一种被广泛使用的交通方式。与技术相关的分心骑行行为和头盔使用情况是会影响自行车安全的行为。本研究的目的有两个:(1)确定纽约市曼哈顿区骑自行车者中与技术相关的分心行为的发生率和类型;(2)评估这些骑自行车者中使用自行车头盔的比例。2014年夏季,使用数码摄像机在曼哈顿五个热门骑行区域对骑自行车者进行了总计50小时的观察。对视频进行编码并统计骑自行车者的总数、性别、自行车类型、戴耳机/耳塞和/或使用手机的人数,以及骑车人是否佩戴头盔。在五个选定地点共观察到近25,000名骑自行车者(n = 24,861)。与非租赁自行车相比,租赁自行车的骑行者不戴头盔的可能性几乎是非租赁自行车骑行者的四倍(花旗自行车(®)比值比3.8;95%置信区间2.5,5.9:其他租赁自行车比值比3.8;95%置信区间3.0,4.9)。在不同时间和地点,女性不戴头盔的几率相对于男性显著增加(比值比1.4;95%置信区间1.1,1.8)。总体而言,与技术相关的分心率较低,使用耳机最为普遍。男性更有可能戴耳机/耳塞(比值比2.0;95%置信区间1.4,2.9),花旗自行车的骑行者相对于其他租赁自行车的骑行者也是如此(比值比2.2;95%置信区间1.3,3.6)。本研究的结果有助于丰富关于共享单车项目骑行者和其他骑自行车者分心骑行和头盔使用情况的文献,并可为旨在改善城市环境中自行车安全的政策制定者和项目规划者提供参考。

相似文献

1
An Analysis of Technology-Related Distracted Biking Behaviors and Helmet Use Among Cyclists in New York City.纽约市骑自行车者与技术相关的分心骑行行为及头盔使用情况分析
J Community Health. 2016 Feb;41(1):138-45. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0079-0.
2
Helmet use among cyclists in New York City.纽约市骑自行车者使用头盔的情况。
J Community Health. 2014 Oct;39(5):956-8. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9836-8.
3
Public bike sharing in New York City: helmet use behavior patterns at 25 Citi Bike™ stations.纽约市的公共自行车共享:25个花旗自行车™站点的头盔使用行为模式
J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):530-3. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9967-y.
4
Helmet use among users of the Citi Bike bicycle-sharing program: a pilot study in New York City.纽约市花旗自行车共享计划使用者的头盔佩戴情况:一项试点研究
J Community Health. 2014 Jun;39(3):503-7. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9785-7.
5
Helmet Use Among Personal Bicycle Riders and Bike Share Users in Vancouver, BC.不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华市个人自行车骑手和共享单车使用者的头盔使用情况。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Oct;53(4):465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
6
Micromobility Vehicles, Obstructions, and Rider Safety Behaviors in New York City Bike Lanes.纽约市自行车道中的微型移动车辆、障碍物和骑行者安全行为。
J Community Health. 2023 Jun;48(3):522-527. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01197-6. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Helmet-Wearing Practices and Barriers in Toronto Bike-Share Users: a Case-Control Study.多伦多共享单车用户佩戴头盔的行为及障碍:一项病例对照研究。
CJEM. 2016 Jan;18(1):28-36. doi: 10.1017/cem.2015.22. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
8
Free-Floating Bikeshare and Helmet Use in Seattle, WA.西雅图的共享单车自由骑行与头盔使用情况。
J Community Health. 2019 Jun;44(3):577-579. doi: 10.1007/s10900-018-00599-1.
9
Impact of age, location, and bicycle style on helmet usage by adults.年龄、地点和自行车款式对成年人戴头盔的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(2):150-4. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.644255.
10
Prevalence of bicycle helmet use by users of public bikeshare programs.公共自行车共享计划使用者使用自行车头盔的流行率。
Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Aug;60(2):228-31. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.03.018. Epub 2012 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Popular but precarious: low helmet use among shared micromobility program riders in San Francisco.流行但不安全:旧金山共享微型移动出行项目骑行者中头盔使用率低
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;12:1477473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1477473. eCollection 2024.
2
Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China.道路安全宣传活动前后摩托车和自行车骑行者的行为,中国。
Bull World Health Organ. 2024 Nov 1;102(11):786-794. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.291524. Epub 2024 Sep 25.
3
Micromobility Vehicles, Obstructions, and Rider Safety Behaviors in New York City Bike Lanes.

本文引用的文献

1
Pedestrian Behavior at Five Dangerous and Busy Manhattan Intersections.曼哈顿五个危险且繁忙十字路口的行人行为。
J Community Health. 2015 Aug;40(4):789-92. doi: 10.1007/s10900-015-0001-9.
2
Severity of urban cycling injuries and the relationship with personal, trip, route and crash characteristics: analyses using four severity metrics.城市自行车骑行伤害的严重程度及其与个人、出行、路线和碰撞特征的关系:使用四种严重程度指标进行分析
BMJ Open. 2015 Jan 5;5(1):e006654. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006654.
3
Public bike sharing in New York City: helmet use behavior patterns at 25 Citi Bike™ stations.
纽约市自行车道中的微型移动车辆、障碍物和骑行者安全行为。
J Community Health. 2023 Jun;48(3):522-527. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01197-6. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
4
Towards a Sustainable City for Cyclists: Promoting Safety through a Mobile Sensing Application.迈向可持续的自行车友好城市:利用移动感应应用提升骑行安全。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Mar 17;21(6):2116. doi: 10.3390/s21062116.
5
The Injuries and Helmet Use in Bike Share Programs: A Systematic Review.共享单车计划中的伤害与头盔使用:系统综述。
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00836-6.
6
Well-being, behavioral patterns and cycling crashes of different age groups in Latin America: Are aging adults the safest cyclists?拉丁美洲不同年龄组的幸福感、行为模式和自行车碰撞事故:老年人是最安全的自行车骑手吗?
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 28;14(8):e0221864. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221864. eCollection 2019.
7
Distraction of cyclists: how does it influence their risky behaviors and traffic crashes?骑车人的注意力分散:它如何影响他们的危险行为和交通事故?
PeerJ. 2018 Sep 12;6:e5616. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5616. eCollection 2018.
纽约市的公共自行车共享:25个花旗自行车™站点的头盔使用行为模式
J Community Health. 2015 Jun;40(3):530-3. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9967-y.
4
The safety of public bicycle share programs in North America.北美公共自行车共享项目的安全性。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Nov;104(11):e5-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302180. Epub 2014 Sep 11.
5
Bicycle helmets are highly effective at preventing head injury during head impact: head-form accelerations and injury criteria for helmeted and unhelmeted impacts.自行车头盔在头部撞击时能有效防止头部受伤:头盔和无头盔撞击的头部加速度和损伤标准。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Sep;70:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.02.016. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
6
Corrigendum to: “Publication bias and time-trend bias in meta-analysis of bicycle helmet efficacy: a re-analysis of Attewell, Glase and McFadden, 2001” [Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 (2011) 1245–1251].勘误:对 Attewell、Glase 和 McFadden 于 2001 年发表的《自行车头盔功效的荟萃分析中的发表偏倚和时间趋势偏倚:再分析》一文的勘误 [事故分析与预防 43 (2011) 1245–1251]。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:245-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.003.
7
A computational simulation study of the influence of helmet wearing on head injury risk in adult cyclists.一种关于头盔佩戴对成人自行车骑手头部受伤风险影响的计算仿真研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Nov;60:15-23. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
8
Helmet legislation and admissions to hospital for cycling related head injuries in Canadian provinces and territories: interrupted time series analysis.头盔立法与加拿大各省份和地区因自行车相关头部受伤而住院治疗的关系:中断时间序列分析。
BMJ. 2013 May 14;346:f2674. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f2674.
9
Bicycling safety and distracted behavior in The Hague, the Netherlands.荷兰海牙的自行车安全和分心行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Aug;57:87-90. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.007. Epub 2013 Apr 13.
10
Mobile device use while driving--United States and seven European countries, 2011.驾驶时使用移动设备——美国和七个欧洲国家,2011 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013 Mar 15;62(10):177-82.