Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Southwest School of Medicine and First Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400038, People's Republic of China.
State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burn and Combined Injuries, Eighth Department, Daping Hospital, Research Institute of Surgery, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400042, People's Republic of China.
J Community Health. 2021 Feb;46(1):203-210. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00836-6.
To investigate the injury effects of bike share programs and the helmet usage status in bike share programs. We conducted a systematic review of peer reviewed scientific literature. Searches were conducted in three databases (Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science) on March 1 2020 to identify all articles on the injury incidence related to bike share programs and the helmet usage status in bike share programs. Titles, abstracts, and full-text articles were screened to identify all articles relevant to the themes by two authors independently, and discrepancies were resolved after discussion with the third author. Standardised data extraction and quality assessment (The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) were implemented. A sum of 491 records after removing duplicates was identified, 181 fulltext articles were screened, and 13 studies were included in the review. The primary outcome are injuries of bike share users and unhelmeted rate among bike share users as well as the unhelmeted rate among personal bike users. Two studies evaluated the injuries related to bike share users, but have inconclusive results. A total of 11 studies reported the unhelmeted rates in bike share programs ranging from 36.0 to 88.9%. There is a significant change in bike injuries with the implementation of bike share programs. Moreover, the unhelmeted rate of bike share users was generally higher than that of personal bike users, which may result from helmets' accessibility and users' safety perception.
为了调查共享单车计划对人体造成的伤害影响以及共享单车计划中头盔的使用情况,我们对同行评议的科学文献进行了系统回顾。2020 年 3 月 1 日,我们在三个数据库(Pubmed、Scopus 和 Web of Science)中进行了检索,以确定所有与共享单车计划相关的伤害发生率以及共享单车计划中头盔使用情况的文章。两位作者独立筛选标题、摘要和全文文章,以确定所有与主题相关的文章,并在与第三位作者讨论后解决分歧。实施了标准化的数据提取和质量评估(纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表)。在去除重复项后,共确定了 491 条记录,筛选了 181 篇全文文章,共有 13 项研究纳入综述。主要结果是共享单车使用者的受伤情况和共享单车使用者中未戴头盔的比例以及个人自行车使用者中未戴头盔的比例。有两项研究评估了与共享单车使用者相关的伤害,但结果尚无定论。共有 11 项研究报告了共享单车计划中未戴头盔的比例,范围从 36.0%到 88.9%。随着共享单车计划的实施,自行车伤害有了显著变化。此外,共享单车使用者未戴头盔的比例一般高于个人自行车使用者,这可能是由于头盔的可及性和使用者的安全意识所致。