Schraeder Cheryl, Fraser Cynthia W, Clark Ida, Long Barbara, Shelton Paul, Waldschmidt Valerie, Kucera Christine L, Lanker William K
Director of Policy & Practice Initiatives, Institute for Healthcare Innovation, UIC College of Nursing, Urbana, IL, USADirector of Operations, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USAClinical Nurse Partner Specialist, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USANurse Partner, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USAOutcomes Analyst, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USAOutcomes Analyst, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USASystems Developer, Health Systems Research Center, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USACarle Clinic Association, Monticello Family Medicine, Monticello, IL, USA.
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Nov;17(11c):407-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02578.x.
The purpose of this study was to test the effectiveness of a collaborative primary care nurse case management intervention emphasising collaboration between physicians, nurses and patients, risk identification, comprehensive assessment, collaborative planning, health monitoring, patient education and transitional care on healthcare utilisation and cost for community dwelling chronically ill older persons.
Primary care teams comprised of nurses and primary care physicians have been suggested as a model for providing quality care to the chronically ill, but this type of intervention has not been systematically evaluated.
A non-randomised, 36 month comparison of two geographically distinct primary care populations was conducted.
Six hundred and seventy-seven persons aged 65 and older were determined to be at high-risk for mortality, functional decline, or increased health service use. The treatment group (n = 400) received the intervention and the comparison group (n = 277) received usual care. Health plan claims files provided data on number of hospitalisations and bed days, emergency department (ED) visits, physician visits and total cost of care.
After adjustment for baseline variables, there were no significant differences between the treatment and comparison group in the percentage of patients hospitalised or ED visits. However, among those hospitalised in the treatment group, the likelihood of being re-hospitalised was significantly reduced by 34% (p = 0·032). After adjusting for the cost of the intervention, although not statistically significant, the reduced hospital use resulted in cost savings of $106 per patient per month in the treatment group.
The results indicate that a collaborative primary care nurse case management intervention has the potential to be an effective alternative to current primary care delivery system practice.
The study suggests that a chronic care intervention emphasising collaboration between physicians, nurses and patients, may be more effective when implemented in integrated provider networks.
本研究旨在测试一种协作式初级护理护士病例管理干预措施的有效性,该措施强调医生、护士和患者之间的协作、风险识别、全面评估、协作规划、健康监测、患者教育及过渡性护理,以探讨其对社区居住的慢性病老年人医疗服务利用和成本的影响。
由护士和初级护理医生组成的初级护理团队被提议作为为慢性病患者提供优质护理的一种模式,但这种干预措施尚未得到系统评估。
对两个地理位置不同的初级护理人群进行了一项为期36个月的非随机比较研究。
确定677名65岁及以上的人在死亡率、功能衰退或医疗服务使用增加方面处于高风险。治疗组(n = 400)接受干预,对照组(n = 277)接受常规护理。健康计划理赔档案提供了住院次数和住院天数、急诊就诊次数、医生就诊次数及护理总成本的数据。
在对基线变量进行调整后,治疗组和对照组在住院患者百分比或急诊就诊方面无显著差异。然而,在治疗组中住院的患者中,再次住院的可能性显著降低了34%(p = 0.032)。在对干预成本进行调整后,尽管无统计学意义,但治疗组因住院次数减少导致每位患者每月节省成本106美元。
结果表明,协作式初级护理护士病例管理干预措施有可能成为当前初级护理提供系统实践的有效替代方案。
该研究表明,强调医生、护士和患者之间协作的慢性病护理干预措施,在综合医疗服务网络中实施时可能更有效。