• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何撰写一篇综述文章?

How to write a review article?

作者信息

Gülpınar Ömer, Güçlü Adil Güçal

机构信息

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine İbni Sina Hospital, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(Suppl 1):44-8. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.054.

DOI:10.5152/tud.2013.054
PMID:26328136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4548566/
Abstract

In the medical sciences, the importance of review articles is rising. When clinicians want to update their knowledge and generate guidelines about a topic, they frequently use reviews as a starting point. The value of a review is associated with what has been done, what has been found and how these findings are presented. Before asking 'how,' the question of 'why' is more important when starting to write a review. The main and fundamental purpose of writing a review is to create a readable synthesis of the best resources available in the literature for an important research question or a current area of research. Although the idea of writing a review is attractive, it is important to spend time identifying the important questions. Good review methods are critical because they provide an unbiased point of view for the reader regarding the current literature. There is a consensus that a review should be written in a systematic fashion, a notion that is usually followed. In a systematic review with a focused question, the research methods must be clearly described. A 'methodological filter' is the best method for identifying the best working style for a research question, and this method reduces the workload when surveying the literature. An essential part of the review process is differentiating good research from bad and leaning on the results of the better studies. The ideal way to synthesize studies is to perform a meta-analysis. In conclusion, when writing a review, it is best to clearly focus on fixed ideas, to use a procedural and critical approach to the literature and to express your findings in an attractive way.

摘要

在医学领域,综述文章的重要性日益凸显。当临床医生想要更新知识并制定关于某个主题的指南时,他们常常将综述作为起点。综述的价值与已做的工作、已发现的内容以及这些发现的呈现方式相关。在探讨“如何”之前,在开始撰写综述时,“为何”的问题更为重要。撰写综述的主要和根本目的是针对一个重要的研究问题或当前的研究领域,对文献中可得的最佳资源进行可读性强的综合。尽管撰写综述的想法很有吸引力,但花时间确定重要问题很重要。良好的综述方法至关重要,因为它们能为读者提供关于当前文献的无偏见观点。人们一致认为综述应以系统的方式撰写,这一理念通常会被遵循。在针对一个重点问题的系统综述中,研究方法必须清晰描述。“方法学筛选”是确定针对一个研究问题的最佳工作方式的最佳方法,这种方法在查阅文献时能减少工作量。综述过程的一个重要部分是区分好的研究与坏的研究,并依据较好研究的结果。综合研究的理想方式是进行荟萃分析。总之,撰写综述时,最好明确聚焦于固定的观点,对文献采用程序性和批判性的方法,并以有吸引力的方式呈现你的发现。

相似文献

1
How to write a review article?如何撰写一篇综述文章?
Turk J Urol. 2013 Sep;39(Suppl 1):44-8. doi: 10.5152/tud.2013.054.
2
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.脊髓型颈椎病:评估文献和建立最佳证据的方法学途径。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 Oct 15;38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7ebbf.
5
Issues in methodological research: perspectives from researchers and commissioners.方法学研究中的问题:来自研究者和委托方的观点
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(8):1-57. doi: 10.3310/hta5080.
6
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
7
How to write an evidence-based clinical review article.如何撰写一篇基于证据的临床综述文章。
Am Fam Physician. 2002 Jan 15;65(2):251-8.
8
[How to write a good clinical review?].[如何撰写一篇优秀的临床综述?]
Nuklearmedizin. 2015;54(2):69-74. doi: 10.3413/Nukmed-2015010002. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
9
How to write a systematic review.如何撰写系统评价。
Am J Sports Med. 2014 Nov;42(11):2761-8. doi: 10.1177/0363546513497567. Epub 2013 Aug 7.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Considering family trees as a useful tool in family medicine: a systematic review.将家谱视为家庭医学中的有用工具:一项系统综述。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2025 Feb 27;26:e21. doi: 10.1017/S1463423625000131.
2
Noise is an underrecognized problem in medical decision making and is known by other names: a scoping review.噪声是医学决策中一个未得到充分认识的问题,它还有其他名称:一项范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Feb 17;25(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02905-z.
3
Impact of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Environment on the Metabolic Profile of Medicinal Plants and Their Therapeutic Potential.环境中重金属污染对药用植物代谢谱及其治疗潜力的影响。
Plants (Basel). 2024 Mar 21;13(6):913. doi: 10.3390/plants13060913.
4
Writing a Scientific Review Article: Comprehensive Insights for Beginners.撰写科学综述文章:给初学者的全面见解
ScientificWorldJournal. 2024 Jan 17;2024:7822269. doi: 10.1155/2024/7822269. eCollection 2024.
5
Metabolomics-directed nanotechnology in viral diseases management: COVID-19 a case study.代谢组学导向的纳米技术在病毒性疾病管理中的应用:以COVID-19为例
Pharmacol Rep. 2023 Oct;75(5):1045-1065. doi: 10.1007/s43440-023-00517-w. Epub 2023 Aug 16.
6
Dietary macrominerals: Updated review of their role and orchestration in human nutrition throughout the life cycle with sex differences.膳食常量矿物质:关于其在整个生命周期人类营养中的作用及调控的最新综述,兼论性别差异
Curr Res Food Sci. 2023 Feb 1;6:100450. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2023.100450. eCollection 2023.
7
Research Trends on Pillared Interlayered Clays (PILCs) Used as Catalysts in Environmental and Chemical Processes: Bibliometric Analysis.作为催化剂用于环境和化学过程的柱撑层状黏土(PILCs)的研究趋势:文献计量分析。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2022 Mar 2;2022:5728678. doi: 10.1155/2022/5728678. eCollection 2022.
8
Melatonin as a Potential Regulator of Oxidative Stress, and Neuroinflammation: Mechanisms and Implications for the Management of Brain Injury-Induced Neurodegeneration.褪黑素作为氧化应激和神经炎症的潜在调节因子:脑损伤诱导神经退行性变管理的机制及意义
J Inflamm Res. 2021 Nov 27;14:6251-6264. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S334423. eCollection 2021.
9
Metformin and Malignant Tumors: Not Over the Hill: A Short Comment [Letter].二甲双胍与恶性肿瘤:尚未过时:简短评论[信函]
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2021 Sep 7;14:3839-3840. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S335574. eCollection 2021.
10
Monoclonal Antibodies Application in Lateral Flow Immunochromatographic Assays for Drugs of Abuse Detection.单克隆抗体在滥用药物侧向流动免疫层析检测中的应用。
Molecules. 2021 Feb 18;26(4):1058. doi: 10.3390/molecules26041058.

本文引用的文献

1
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade.为同行评审期刊撰写叙述性文献综述:行业秘诀
J Chiropr Med. 2006 Autumn;5(3):101-17. doi: 10.1016/S0899-3467(07)60142-6.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2535. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.
3
Balancing the strengths of systematic and narrative reviews.平衡系统评价和叙述性综述的优势。
Hum Reprod Update. 2005 Mar-Apr;11(2):103-4. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh058. Epub 2004 Dec 23.
4
Assessing the quality of research.评估研究质量。
BMJ. 2004 Jan 3;328(7430):39-41. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7430.39.
5
Number of published systematic reviews and global burden of disease: database analysis.已发表的系统评价数量与全球疾病负担:数据库分析
BMJ. 2003 Nov 8;327(7423):1083-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7423.1083.
6
The medical review article revisited: has the science improved?医学综述文章再探讨:科学水平有所提高吗?
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Dec 21;131(12):947-51. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-131-12-199912210-00007.
7
Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses.提高随机对照试验的Meta分析报告质量:QUOROM声明。Meta分析报告的质量。
Lancet. 1999 Nov 27;354(9193):1896-900. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5.
8
Users' guides to the medical literature. VI. How to use an overview. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group.医学文献用户指南。VI. 如何使用综述。循证医学工作组。
JAMA. 1994 Nov 2;272(17):1367-71. doi: 10.1001/jama.272.17.1367.
9
The medical review article: state of the science.医学综述文章:科学现状
Ann Intern Med. 1987 Mar;106(3):485-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-106-3-485.