• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术技术在肾结石治疗中的疗效及影响残余结石率的因素

Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones.

作者信息

Aydemir Hüseyin, Budak Salih, Kumsar Şükrü, Köse Osman, Sağlam Hasan Salih, Adsan Öztuğ

机构信息

Department of Urology, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Urol. 2014 Sep;40(3):144-9. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.40360.

DOI:10.5152/tud.2014.40360
PMID:26328168
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4548389/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate, the efficacy of surgical methods and the factors affecting the residual stone rate by scrutinizing retrospectively the patients who had undergone renal stone surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Records of 109 cases of kidney stones who had been surgically treated between January 2010, and July 2013 were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups in terms of surgical treatment; open stone surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). Patients' history, physical examination, biochemical and radiological images and operative and postoperative data were recorded.

RESULTS

The patients had undergone PNL (n=74; 67.9%), RIRS (n=22;20.2%), and open renal surgery (n=13; 11.9%). The mean and median ages of the patients were 46±9, 41 (21-75) and, 42 (23-67) years, respectively. The mean stone burden was 2.6±0.7 cm(2) in the PNL, 1.4±0.1 cm(2) in the RIRS, and 3.1±0.9 cm(2) in the open surgery groups. The mean operative times were 126±24 min in the PNL group, 72±12 min in the RIRS group and 82±22 min in the open surgery group. The duration of hospitalisation was 3.1±0.2 days, 1.2±0.3 days and 3.4±1.1 days respectively. While the RIRS group did not need blood transfusion, in the PNL group blood transfusions were given in the PNL (n=18), and open surgery (n=2) groups. Residual stones were detected in the PNL (n=22), open surgery (n=2), and RIRS (n=5) groups.

CONCLUSION

PNL and RIRS have been seen as safe and effective methods in our self application too. However, it should not be forgotten that as a basical method, open surgery may be needed in cases of necessity.

摘要

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在通过回顾性分析接受肾结石手术的患者,评估手术方法的疗效以及影响残余结石率的因素。

材料与方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年7月期间接受手术治疗的109例肾结石患者的记录。根据手术治疗方式将患者分为三组;开放性取石手术、经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)和逆行肾内手术(RIRS)。记录患者的病史、体格检查、生化及影像学资料以及手术和术后数据。

结果

患者接受了经皮肾镜取石术(n = 74;67.9%)、逆行肾内手术(n = 22;20.2%)和开放性肾脏手术(n = 13;11.9%)。患者的平均年龄和中位数年龄分别为46±9岁、41岁(21 - 75岁)和42岁(23 - 67岁)。经皮肾镜取石术组的平均结石负荷为2.6±0.7 cm²,逆行肾内手术组为1.4±0.1 cm²,开放性手术组为3.1±0.9 cm²。经皮肾镜取石术组的平均手术时间为126±24分钟,逆行肾内手术组为72±12分钟,开放性手术组为82±22分钟。住院时间分别为3.1±0.2天、1.2±0.3天和3.4±1.1天。逆行肾内手术组无需输血,而经皮肾镜取石术组(n = 18)和开放性手术组(n = 2)有输血情况。在经皮肾镜取石术组(n = 22)、开放性手术组(n = 2)和逆行肾内手术组(n = 5)中检测到残余结石。

结论

在我们自己的应用中,经皮肾镜取石术和逆行肾内手术也被视为安全有效的方法。然而,不应忘记,作为一种基本方法,在必要情况下可能仍需要开放性手术。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of surgical techniques and factors affecting residual stone rate in the treatment of kidney stones.手术技术在肾结石治疗中的疗效及影响残余结石率的因素
Turk J Urol. 2014 Sep;40(3):144-9. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.40360.
2
Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Methods For Management of Big- Sized Kidney Stones(? 4 cm): Single Center Retrospective Study.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗大尺寸肾结石(≥4 cm)的比较:单中心回顾性研究
Urol J. 2019 Jun 17;16(3):232-235. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4072.
3
A Comparison of Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Management of Renal Stones ?2 CM.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径≥2厘米肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2017 Jan 18;14(1):2949-2954.
4
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery versus a single-session percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole stones with a diameter of 15 to 30 mm: A propensity score-matching study.逆行性肾内手术与一期经皮肾镜取石术治疗直径15至30毫米下极结石的比较:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jul;56(7):525-32. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.7.525. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
5
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in multiple calyceal stones: A match pair analysis of 190 cases.对比逆行性肾内手术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗多发肾盏结石:190 例配对分析。
Arch Esp Urol. 2021 Mar;74(2):247-253.
6
Comparison stone-free rate and effects on quality of life of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal pelvis stone (2-4 cm): A prospective controlled study.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗肾盂结石(2 - 4厘米)的无石率及对生活质量影响的比较:一项前瞻性对照研究。
Curr Urol. 2022 Mar;16(1):5-8. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000071. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
7
Safety and efficacy of PNL vs RIRS in the management of stones located in horseshoe kidneys: A critical comparative evaluation.经皮肾镜取石术(PNL)与逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗马蹄肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项关键的对比评估
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2018 Sep 30;90(3):149-154. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2018.3.149.
8
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery outcomes for kidney stones larger than 2 cm from Guy's stone scoring system perspective.从 Guy 结石评分系统角度比较大于 2cm 的肾结石经皮肾镜碎石取石术与逆行性肾内手术的疗效。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14956. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14956. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
9
Is RIRS Safe and Efficient In Patients With Kidney Stones Who Had Previous Open, Endoscopic, or Percutaneous Kidney Stone Surgery? One Center Retrospective Study.经皮肾镜取石术、开放手术或内镜取石术治疗肾结石后行 RIRS 是否安全有效?单中心回顾性研究。
Urol J. 2020 May 16;17(3):228-231. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4950.
10
Comparision of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery For The Treatment of Multicalyceal and Multiple Renal Stones.经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术治疗多肾盏及多发性肾结石的比较
Urol J. 2018 Nov 17;15(6):318-322. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4213.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm.经皮肾镜取石术、冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗10-20毫米下极肾结石的比较
Urol Int. 2013;91(3):345-9. doi: 10.1159/000351136. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
2
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy complications in 671 consecutive patients: a single-center experience.671例连续患者经皮肾镜取石术并发症:单中心经验
Urol J. 2011 Fall;8(4):271-6.
3
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones.经皮肾镜碎石术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗中等大小肾结石。
Urology. 2011 Oct;78(4):739-43. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
4
Does open stone surgery still play a role in the treatment of urolithiasis? Data of a primary urolithiasis center.开放取石手术在尿石症治疗中仍发挥作用吗?一家原发性尿石症中心的数据。
J Endourol. 2009 Jul;23(7):1209-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0027.
5
Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术的并发症
Eur Urol. 2007 Apr;51(4):899-906; discussion 906. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.020. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
6
Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup.输尿管镜激光碎石术治疗上尿路结石并进行主动碎片取出及计算机断层扫描随访
J Urol. 2006 Jun;175(6):2129-33; discussion 2133-4. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(06)00311-9.
7
Simultaneous combined use of flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy to reduce the number of access tracts in the management of complex renal calculi.同时联合使用软性输尿管镜和经皮肾镜取石术以减少复杂肾结石治疗中通道的数量。
BJU Int. 2005 Nov;96(7):1097-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05808.x.
8
Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less.比较冲击波碎石术和输尿管镜检查治疗直径1厘米及以下下极肾盏结石的前瞻性随机试验。
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):2005-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000158458.51706.56.
9
Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations.第1章:美国泌尿外科学会鹿角形结石管理指南:诊断与治疗建议
J Urol. 2005 Jun;173(6):1991-2000. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000161171.67806.2a.
10
Identifying patients who are suitable for stentless ureteroscopy following treatment of urolithiasis.确定在尿路结石治疗后适合进行无支架输尿管镜检查的患者。
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):103-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000069546.53896.6a.