• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses.可弯曲阴茎假体与两件式可充气阴茎假体患者满意度的比较。
Turk J Urol. 2014 Dec;40(4):207-10. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.37108.
2
Comparison of Long-Term Results and Couples' Satisfaction with Penile Implant Types and Brands: Lessons Learned From 883 Patients With Erectile Dysfunction Who Underwent Penile Prosthesis Implantation.比较不同类型和品牌阴茎植入物的长期效果和患者夫妇满意度:883 例勃起功能障碍患者阴茎假体植入术后的经验教训。
J Sex Med. 2019 Jul;16(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.04.013. Epub 2019 May 31.
3
Long term patient satisfaction and quality of life with AMS700CX inflatable penile prosthesis.使用AMS700CX可膨胀阴茎假体的长期患者满意度和生活质量
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2013 Sep 26;85(3):133-7. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2013.3.133.
4
Prospective analysis of the surgical outcomes and patients' satisfaction rate after the AMS Spectra penile prosthesis implantation.前瞻性分析 AMS Spectra 阴茎假体植入术后的手术效果和患者满意度。
Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):373-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2013.04.027. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
5
Evaluation of Satisfaction and Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Two-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation.接受两件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入患者的满意度及预后评估。
Cureus. 2022 Jun 19;14(6):e26097. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26097. eCollection 2022 Jun.
6
Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.欧洲的阴茎植入术:意大利和德国253例植入手术的成功与并发症情况
J Sex Med. 2008 Jun;5(6):1503-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00819.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
7
Long-term outcomes of AMS Spectra® penile prosthesis implantation and satisfaction rates.AMS Spectra®阴茎假体植入的长期结果及满意度
Int J Impot Res. 2017 Sep;29(5):184-188. doi: 10.1038/ijir.2017.16. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
8
Penile prosthesis implantation in Chinese patients with severe erectile dysfunction: 10-year experience.中国严重勃起功能障碍患者阴茎假体植入术:10 年经验。
Asian J Androl. 2013 Sep;15(5):658-61. doi: 10.1038/aja.2013.78. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
9
Long-term patient-reported satisfaction with different inflatable penile prosthesis: Comparison between AMS 700CX and Coloplast Titan.患者对不同可膨胀阴茎假体的长期满意度报告:AMS 700CX与柯洛普拉斯泰坦(Coloplast Titan)的比较
Rev Int Androl. 2018 Jul-Sep;16(3):112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.androl.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
10
3-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement Following Radical Cystoprostatectomy and Urinary Diversion: Technique and Outcomes.根治性膀胱切除术和尿流改道术后 3 件式可膨胀阴茎假体植入术:技术与结果。
J Sex Med. 2018 Jun;15(6):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.01.014. Epub 2018 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of life outcomes following penile prosthesis insertion in the post-ischaemic priapism setting.阴茎假体植入治疗缺血性阴茎异常勃起后的生活质量结果
Int J Impot Res. 2025 Jul 25. doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01073-y.
2
Narrative review of immediate salvage for penile prosthesis infection.阴茎假体感染即刻挽救治疗的叙述性综述
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Apr 30;13(4):584-595. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-277. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Current devices, outcomes, and pain management considerations in penile implant surgery: an updated review of the literature.目前阴茎植入手术中的设备、结果和疼痛管理注意事项:文献的最新综述。
Asian J Androl. 2024 Jul 1;26(4):335-343. doi: 10.4103/aja202386. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
4
Penile implants in low flow priapism.阴茎植入物治疗低流量性阴茎异常勃起。
Int J Impot Res. 2023 Nov;35(7):651-663. doi: 10.1038/s41443-023-00787-1. Epub 2023 Oct 28.
5
Malleable Penile Implant Rod Diameter Predicts Complications and Patient Satisfaction.可弯曲阴茎植入物杆直径可预测并发症及患者满意度。
Sex Med. 2022 Apr;10(2):100486. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2021.100486. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
6
Ischaemic priapism: A clinical review.缺血性阴茎异常勃起:临床综述
Turk J Urol. 2017 Mar;43(1):1-8. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.59458. Epub 2017 Mar 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing the difficult penile prosthesis patient.处理有困难的阴茎假体患者。
J Sex Med. 2013 Apr;10(4):893-906; quiz 907. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12115.
2
Guidelines on male sexual dysfunction: erectile dysfunction and premature ejaculation.男性性功能障碍指南:勃起功能障碍和早泄。
Eur Urol. 2010 May;57(5):804-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.020. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
3
Penile implantation in Europe: successes and complications with 253 implants in Italy and Germany.欧洲的阴茎植入术:意大利和德国253例植入手术的成功与并发症情况
J Sex Med. 2008 Jun;5(6):1503-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00819.x. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
4
Penile prosthesis surgery: a review of prosthetic devices and associated complications.阴茎假体手术:假体装置及相关并发症综述
J Sex Med. 2007 Mar;4(2):296-309. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00434.x.
5
Outcomes and satisfaction rates for the redesigned 2-piece penile prosthesis.重新设计的两件式阴茎假体的治疗效果及满意度
J Urol. 2007 Jan;177(1):262-6. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.094.
6
Penile prosthesis implantation for end-stage erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后终末期勃起功能障碍的阴茎假体植入术。
Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S51-7.
7
[Penile prosthesis. Quality outcomes and morbidity].[阴茎假体。质量结果与发病率]
Arch Esp Urol. 2005 Nov;58(9):925-30; disscusion 930. doi: 10.4321/s0004-06142005000900009.
8
Outcome of penile prosthesis implantation for treating erectile dysfunction: experience with 504 procedures.阴茎假体植入治疗勃起功能障碍的结果:504例手术经验
BJU Int. 2006 Jan;97(1):129-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05907.x.
9
Mechanical reliability and safety of, and patient satisfaction with the Ambicor inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a 2 center study.安比可膨胀阴茎假体的机械可靠性、安全性及患者满意度:一项双中心研究的结果
J Urol. 2001 Sep;166(3):932-7.
10
Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction outcomes of the AMS 700CX inflatable penile prosthesis: results of a long-term multicenter study. AMS 700CX Study Group.AMS 700CX可膨胀阴茎假体的疗效、安全性及患者满意度结果:一项长期多中心研究的结果。AMS 700CX研究组
J Urol. 2000 Aug;164(2):376-80.

可弯曲阴茎假体与两件式可充气阴茎假体患者满意度的比较。

Comparison of patient satisfaction rates for the malleable and two piece-inflatable penile prostheses.

作者信息

Kılıçarslan Hakan, Kaynak Yurdaer, Gökcen Kaan, Coşkun Burhan, Kaygısız Onur

机构信息

Department of Urology, Uludağ University Faculty of Medicine, Bursa, Turkey.

Department of Urology, Eskişehir State Hospital, Eskişehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Turk J Urol. 2014 Dec;40(4):207-10. doi: 10.5152/tud.2014.37108.

DOI:10.5152/tud.2014.37108
PMID:26328179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4548368/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient/partner satisfaction with AMS 600-650 and AMS Ambicore penile implants (American Medical Systems, Minneapolis, USA) in patients with erectile dysfunction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The modified Erectile Dysfunction Inventory of Treatment Satisfaction (EDITS) questionnaires at six months after implantation of 46 patients who underwent AMS 600-650 (n=23) or Ambicore placement (n=23) between 1/1/2008 and 1/1/2013 were analyzed.

RESULTS

The percentages of patients with AMS 600-650 who reported to be satisfied, very satisfied and neither satisfied nor dissatisfied with their prostheses were 34.78% (n=8), 30.43% (n=7) and 34.78% (n=8), respectively. For patients with AMS Ambicore, these percentages were 73.91% (n=17), 13.04% (n=3) and 13.04% (n=3), respectively. These overall satisfaction rates were significantly different between patients with AMS 600-650 and Ambicore (p=0.013). For patients with AMS 600-650, the percentages of patients who reported to be very likely, neither likely nor unlikely, or very unlikely to continue using their prosthesis were 30.43% (n=7), 34.78% (n=8), and 34.78% (n=8) while for patients with AMS Ambicore, these percentages were 65.21%, 21.33%, and 13.04%, respectively. These percentages were different between patients with AMS 600-650 and Ambicore (p=0.018).

CONCLUSION

The two-piece inflatable penile prosthesis was found to be more successful in overall satisfaction and more likely for continued use when compared to the malleable penile prosthesis.

摘要

目的

比较勃起功能障碍患者对美国美敦力公司(位于美国明尼阿波利斯)生产的AMS 600 - 650阴茎假体和AMS Ambicore阴茎假体的患者/伴侣满意度。

材料与方法

分析了2008年1月1日至2013年1月1日期间接受AMS 600 - 650植入术(n = 23)或Ambicore植入术(n = 23)的46例患者术后6个月的改良治疗满意度勃起功能障碍问卷(EDITS)。

结果

报告对AMS 600 - 650假体满意、非常满意以及既不满意也不不满意的患者百分比分别为34.78%(n = 8)、30.43%(n = 7)和34.78%(n = 8)。对于使用AMS Ambicore假体的患者,这些百分比分别为73.91%(n = 17)、13.04%(n = 3)和13.04%(n = 3)。AMS 600 - 650假体患者和Ambicore假体患者的总体满意度存在显著差异(p = 0.013)。对于使用AMS 600 - 650假体的患者,报告非常可能、不太可能或非常不可能继续使用其假体的患者百分比分别为30.43%(n = 7)、34.78%(n = 8)和34.78%(n = 8),而对于使用AMS Ambicore假体的患者,这些百分比分别为65.21%、21.33%和13.04%。AMS 600 - 650假体患者和Ambicore假体患者的这些百分比存在差异(p = 0.018)。

结论

与可弯曲阴茎假体相比,两件式可膨胀阴茎假体在总体满意度方面更成功,且更有可能继续使用。