Fadda Marta, Depping Miriam K, Schulz Peter J
Institute of Communication and Health, Faculty of Communication Sciences, University of Lugano, Via G. Buffi 13, 6900, Lugano, Switzerland.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 2;15:836. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2200-9.
Whether or not to vaccinate one's child is one of the first health-related decisions parents have to make after their child's birth. For the past 20 years, the share of parents choosing not to immunize their children has increased in many countries, for various reasons. Among these, rumors affirming that vaccinations contain dangerous chemicals or might trigger severe chronic diseases have negatively affected parental attitudes towards pediatric immunizations, particularly the vaccination against measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), raising a number of public health concerns. The primary aim of this qualitative study is to understand what drives parents' decision, giving special attention to vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment in such a context.
Twenty individual semi-structured interviews were conducted in the Canton of Ticino (Switzerland) between January and June 2014. Participants were either mothers or fathers of children less than 1 year old living in Switzerland. An inductive thematic analysis was performed to identify the main themes with regard to vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment in the MMR vaccination decision-making.
Parents' reports yielded four main themes: (a) the paradox of the free choice, referring to the misinterpretation of current vaccination policies; (b) giving up the power, pointing at the outcomes of a low perceived competence; (c) a far-reaching decision, reflecting the importance attributed to the MMR choice and the different levels of impact the decision can have; (d) the demand for shared-decision making, referring to the parental needs in relation to the child's healthcare provider.
Understanding what drives parents' management of their children's immunization schedule in terms of vaccination literacy and psychological empowerment can help health professionals to communicate more effectively with parents in order to facilitate an informed decision, and stakeholders to design tailored health education programs and materials. This can ultimately help increase the coverage of the MMR vaccination.
是否给孩子接种疫苗是父母在孩子出生后必须做出的首批与健康相关的决定之一。在过去20年里,许多国家中选择不给孩子接种疫苗的父母比例有所上升,原因多种多样。其中,声称疫苗含有危险化学物质或可能引发严重慢性病的谣言对父母对接种小儿疫苗,尤其是麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)联合疫苗的态度产生了负面影响,引发了诸多公共卫生问题。这项定性研究的主要目的是了解促使父母做出决定的因素,特别关注这种背景下的疫苗接种知识和心理赋权情况。
2014年1月至6月期间,在瑞士提契诺州进行了20次个人半结构式访谈。参与者为居住在瑞士的1岁以下儿童的母亲或父亲。进行了归纳主题分析,以确定MMR疫苗接种决策中与疫苗接种知识和心理赋权相关的主要主题。
父母的报告产生了四个主要主题:(a)自由选择的悖论,指对当前疫苗接种政策的误解;(b)放弃权力,指出感知能力低下的后果;(c)意义深远的决定,反映出对MMR疫苗选择的重视以及该决定可能产生的不同影响程度;(d)共同决策的需求,指父母对孩子医疗服务提供者的需求。
从疫苗接种知识和心理赋权方面理解促使父母安排孩子免疫接种计划的因素,有助于卫生专业人员与父母更有效地沟通,以便促成明智的决定,也有助于利益相关者设计量身定制的健康教育项目和材料。这最终有助于提高MMR疫苗的接种覆盖率。