Banca Paula, Vestergaard Martin D, Rankov Vladan, Baek Kwangyeol, Mitchell Simon, Lapa Tatyana, Castelo-Branco Miguel, Voon Valerie
1] Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK [2] PhD Programme in Experimental Biology and Biomedicine, Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Portugal [3] Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015 Mar 13;40(5):1192-202. doi: 10.1038/npp.2014.303.
The compulsive behaviour underlying obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) may be related to abnormalities in decision-making. The inability to commit to ultimate decisions, for example, patients unable to decide whether their hands are sufficiently clean, may reflect failures in accumulating sufficient evidence before a decision. Here we investigate the process of evidence accumulation in OCD in perceptual discrimination, hypothesizing enhanced evidence accumulation relative to healthy volunteers. Twenty-eight OCD patients and thirty-five controls were tested with a low-level visual perceptual task (random-dot-motion task, RDMT) and two response conflict control tasks. Regression analysis across different motion coherence levels and Hierarchical Drift Diffusion Modelling (HDDM) were used to characterize response strategies between groups in the RDMT. Patients required more evidence under high uncertainty perceptual contexts, as indexed by longer response time and higher decision boundaries. HDDM, which defines a decision when accumulated noisy evidence reaches a decision boundary, further showed slower drift rate towards the decision boundary reflecting poorer quality of evidence entering the decision process in patients under low uncertainty. With monetary incentives emphasizing speed and penalty for slower responses, patients decreased the decision thresholds relative to controls, accumulating less evidence in low uncertainty. These findings were unrelated to visual perceptual deficits and response conflict. This study provides evidence for impaired decision-formation processes in OCD, with a differential influence of high and low uncertainty contexts on evidence accumulation (decision threshold) and on the quality of evidence gathered (drift rates). It further emphasizes that OCD patients are sensitive to monetary incentives heightening speed in the speed-accuracy tradeoff, improving evidence accumulation.
强迫症(OCD)背后的强迫行为可能与决策异常有关。例如,无法做出最终决定,如患者无法确定自己的手是否足够干净,可能反映出在做出决定前未能积累足够的证据。在此,我们研究强迫症患者在知觉辨别中证据积累的过程,假设相对于健康志愿者,其证据积累增强。28名强迫症患者和35名对照组被试接受了一项低水平视觉知觉任务(随机点运动任务,RDMT)和两项反应冲突控制任务测试。通过对不同运动连贯性水平进行回归分析以及采用分层漂移扩散模型(HDDM)来刻画RDMT中两组之间的反应策略。在高不确定性知觉情境下,患者需要更多证据,这表现为更长的反应时间和更高的决策边界。HDDM定义当积累的噪声证据达到决策边界时做出决定,进一步显示患者在低不确定性下朝着决策边界的漂移率较慢,这反映了进入决策过程的证据质量较差。当给予金钱激励以强调速度并对较慢反应进行惩罚时,患者相对于对照组降低了决策阈值,在低不确定性下积累的证据更少。这些发现与视觉知觉缺陷和反应冲突无关。本研究为强迫症患者决策形成过程受损提供了证据,高、低不确定性情境对证据积累(决策阈值)和所收集证据质量(漂移率)有不同影响。它还进一步强调,强迫症患者在速度 - 准确性权衡中对提高速度的金钱激励敏感,这会改善证据积累。