• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

扩大获得协作式助产士和产科医生模式与剖宫产率之间的关联。

The Association of Expanded Access to a Collaborative Midwifery and Laborist Model With Cesarean Delivery Rates.

作者信息

Rosenstein Melissa G, Nijagal Malini, Nakagawa Sanae, Gregorich Steven E, Kuppermann Miriam

机构信息

Departments of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Medicine, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, Prima Medical Foundation, Novato, and Marin General Hospital, Greenbrae, California; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):716-723. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001032.

DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001032
PMID:26348175
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4580519/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between expanded access to collaborative midwifery and laborist services and cesarean delivery rates.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study at a community hospital between 2005 and 2014. In 2011, privately insured women changed from a private practice model to one that included 24-hour midwifery and laborist coverage. Primary cesarean delivery rates among nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex women and vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC) rates among women with prior cesarean delivery were compared before and after the change. Multivariable logistic regression models estimated the effects of the change on the odds of primary cesarean delivery and VBAC; an interrupted time-series analysis estimated the annual rates before and after the expansion.

RESULTS

There were 3,560 nulliparous term singleton vertex deliveries and 1,324 deliveries with prior cesarean delivery during the study period; 45% were among privately insured women whose care model changed. The primary cesarean delivery rate among these privately insured women decreased after the change, from 31.7% to 25.0% (P=.005, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.81). The interrupted time-series analysis estimated a 7% drop in the primary cesarean delivery rate in the year after the expansion and a decrease of 1.7% per year thereafter. The VBAC rate increased from 13.3% before to 22.4% afterward (adjusted OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.08-3.80).

CONCLUSION

The change from a private practice to a collaborative midwifery-laborist model was associated with a decrease in primary cesarean rates and an increase in VBAC rates.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

摘要

目的

探讨扩大协作助产服务和产科医生服务的可及性与剖宫产率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项于2005年至2014年在一家社区医院开展的前瞻性队列研究。2011年,参加私人保险的女性的护理模式从私人执业模式转变为包含24小时助产服务和产科医生服务的模式。比较了转变前后初产妇、足月、单胎、头位产妇的初次剖宫产率以及有剖宫产史女性的剖宫产术后阴道分娩(VBAC)率。多变量逻辑回归模型估计了这种转变对初次剖宫产和VBAC几率的影响;中断时间序列分析估计了扩大服务前后的年发生率。

结果

研究期间共有3560例初产妇足月单胎头位分娩以及1324例有剖宫产史的分娩;其中45%发生在护理模式发生改变的参加私人保险的女性中。这些参加私人保险的女性的初次剖宫产率在转变后有所下降,从31.7%降至25.0%(P = 0.005,调整优势比[OR]为0.56,95%置信区间[CI]为0.39 - 0.81)。中断时间序列分析估计,扩大服务后的第一年初次剖宫产率下降了7%,此后每年下降1.7%。VBAC率从之前的13.3%升至之后的22.4%(调整OR为2.03,95%CI为1.08 - 3.80)。

结论

从私人执业模式转变为协作助产 - 产科医生模式与初次剖宫产率降低及VBAC率升高有关。

证据级别

II级。

相似文献

1
The Association of Expanded Access to a Collaborative Midwifery and Laborist Model With Cesarean Delivery Rates.扩大获得协作式助产士和产科医生模式与剖宫产率之间的关联。
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Oct;126(4):716-723. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001032.
2
Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.剖宫产术后阴道分娩与初次剖宫产率的关系。
Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Nov;122(5):1010-1017. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a91e0f.
3
Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.一个产房的两种实践模式:与剖宫产率的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):491.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
4
The Collaborative Laborist and Midwifery Model: An Accepted and Sustainable Model.协作式助产士与产科医生模式:一种被认可且可持续的模式。
S D Med. 2018 Dec;71(12):534-537.
5
Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.在单一医院产科医师模式下,不同医师的初次剖宫产率存在差异。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Apr;214(4):531.e1-531.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
6
Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.理解导致原发性剖宫产和剖宫产后阴道分娩的因素:2005-2015 年意大利东北部弗留利-威尼斯朱利亚地区的研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 15;10(1):380. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-57037-y.
7
Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.经剖宫产分娩预测模型在有两次既往剖宫产史女性中的验证
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;125(4):948-952. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000744.
8
Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option?有两次剖宫产史的女性的产科结局:剖宫产术后阴道分娩是一个可行的选择吗?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Apr;192(4):1223-8; discussion 1228-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.082.
9
Deciding on the mode of birth after a previous caesarean section - An online survey investigating women's preferences in Western Switzerland.既往剖宫产术后分娩方式的选择——一项调查瑞士西部女性偏好的在线调查
Midwifery. 2017 Jul;50:219-227. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2017.04.005. Epub 2017 Apr 21.
10
Severe perineal trauma among women undergoing vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: A population-based cohort study.剖宫产后阴道分娩的妇女中严重会阴创伤:基于人群的队列研究。
Birth. 2019 Jun;46(2):379-386. doi: 10.1111/birt.12402. Epub 2018 Oct 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Examining provider practice-level disparities in delivery outcomes among patients with a history of Cesarean Delivery.检查有剖宫产史的患者在分娩结局方面的提供者实践水平差异。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Apr 5;24(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06458-3.
2
Interventions targeting healthcare providers to optimise use of caesarean section: a qualitative comparative analysis to identify important intervention features.针对医疗保健提供者的干预措施以优化剖宫产术的使用:确定重要干预特征的定性比较分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 14;22(1):1526. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08783-9.
3
Advancing quality and safety of perinatal services in India: opportunities for effective midwifery integration.

本文引用的文献

1
Two practice models in one labor and delivery unit: association with cesarean delivery rates.一个产房的两种实践模式:与剖宫产率的关联
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Apr;212(4):491.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
2
Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care.助产士和优质护理:新的母婴护理循证框架的研究结果。
Lancet. 2014 Sep 20;384(9948):1129-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3. Epub 2014 Jun 22.
3
Implementation of a laborist program and evaluation of the effect upon cesarean delivery.
提高印度围产期服务的质量和安全性:有效整合助产服务的机会。
Health Policy Plan. 2022 Sep 13;37(8):1042-1063. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czac032.
4
Contrasting Birth Preferences to Practices in El Paso, Texas.德克萨斯州埃尔帕索市出生偏好与实际情况的对比
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Mar 29;3:830512. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.830512. eCollection 2022.
5
Composite non-clinical interventions for a safe cesarean section rate reduction: results of a pre-post interventional study.复合非临床干预措施降低剖宫产安全率:一项干预前后研究的结果。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Nov 19;21(1):783. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04245-y.
6
Women's experiences of planning a vaginal birth after caesarean in different models of maternity care in Australia.澳大利亚不同模式的产时保健服务下,妇女计划剖宫产术后阴道分娩的体验。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03075-8.
7
Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification.根据罗伯逊分类法,影响剖宫产率的非临床变量。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Apr 15;56(4):180. doi: 10.3390/medicina56040180.
8
Using the Robson 10-Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives.利用 Robson 10 组分类系统比较有和没有助产士的美国中心之间的剖宫产利用情况。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):10-21. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13035. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
9
Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.预防肥胖女性的剖宫产分娩:安全分娩数据联盟中单位级助产士存在对女性剖宫产使用的影响。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020 Jan;65(1):22-32. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13022. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
10
Cesarean delivery rate and staffing levels of the maternity unit.剖宫产率和产科人员配备水平。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207379. eCollection 2018.
实施劳工主义项目并评估其对剖宫产的影响。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;209(3):251.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.06.040. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
4
Cesarean delivery rates vary tenfold among US hospitals; reducing variation may address quality and cost issues.美国各医院的剖宫产率差异高达十倍;降低这种差异可能有助于解决质量和成本问题。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):527-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1030.
5
Severe maternal morbidity among delivery and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States.美国分娩和产后住院期间的严重产妇发病率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Nov;120(5):1029-36. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e31826d60c5.
6
Obstetrician/gynecologist hospitalists: can we improve safety and outcomes for patients and hospitals and improve lifestyle for physicians?妇产科医院医师:我们能否提高患者和医院的安全性和治疗效果,并改善医生的生活方式?
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Aug;207(2):81-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.06.045. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
7
Expanding access to midwifery care: using one practice's success to create community change.扩大助产护理的可及性:利用一个实践的成功来推动社区变革。
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012 Jul-Aug;57(4):376-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-2011.2011.00153.x. Epub 2012 Jun 21.
8
The laborist model of obstetric care: we need more evidence.劳工模式的产科护理:我们需要更多的证据。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Jul;207(1):30-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
9
Comparison of labor and delivery care provided by certified nurse-midwives and physicians: a systematic review, 1990 to 2008.比较认证的助产士和医生提供的分娩护理:系统评价,1990 年至 2008 年。
Womens Health Issues. 2012 Jan-Feb;22(1):e73-81. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.06.005. Epub 2011 Aug 23.
10
Recent trends and patterns in cesarean and vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) deliveries in the United States.美国剖宫产和剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的最新趋势和模式。
Clin Perinatol. 2011 Jun;38(2):179-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2011.03.007.