Suppr超能文献

男性使用避孕套的抵触情绪:酒精对计划行为理论构成要素的影响。

Men's condom use resistance: Alcohol effects on theory of planned behavior constructs.

作者信息

Davis Kelly Cue, Jacques-Tiura Angela J, Stappenbeck Cynthia A, Danube Cinnamon L, Morrison Diane M, Norris Jeanette, George William H

机构信息

School of Social Work, University of Washington.

Prevention Research Center, Wayne State University.

出版信息

Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;35(2):178-86. doi: 10.1037/hea0000269. Epub 2015 Sep 7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study is a novel investigation of (a) the utility of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to predict men's condom use resistance (CUR; i.e., attempts to avoid condom use with a partner who wants to use one and (b) the effects of alcohol on endorsement of TPB-CUR constructs.

METHOD

Using an alcohol administration protocol, a between- and within-subjects experiment was conducted with a community sample of 312 young male nonproblem drinkers who have sex with women. After assessing endorsement of TPB-CUR constructs (e.g., attitudes, norms, self-efficacy, control, and intentions) in a sober state, beverage condition was experimentally manipulated between subjects and endorsement of TPB-CUR constructs was reassessed.

RESULTS

Analyses included repeated measures multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVAs) with beverage condition (no alcohol vs. alcohol) as the between-subjects factor and time (prebeverage vs. postbeverage) as the within-subjects factor. Between-subjects, intoxicated participants reported significantly stronger CUR intentions, more favorable CUR attitudes and normative perceptions, and greater CUR self-efficacy than sober participants. There were significant within-subject changes for CUR intentions, attitudes, normative perceptions, and self-efficacy. Neither between- nor within-subjects effects were found for CUR control. An exploratory multigroup path analysis indicated that the relationships among the TPB-CUR constructs were similar for alcohol and no alcohol groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicated that alcohol intoxication increased men's CUR intentions and self-efficacy and led to more positive CUR attitudes and norms, yet had no effect on CUR control. Future research should examine whether there are similar effects of intoxication on TPB constructs related to other sexual risk behaviors.

摘要

目的

本研究是一项全新的调查,旨在探讨:(a)计划行为理论(TPB)预测男性避孕套使用抗拒(CUR,即与希望使用避孕套的伴侣在一起时试图避免使用避孕套的行为)的效用;(b)酒精对TPB-CUR结构认可的影响。

方法

采用酒精给药方案,对312名与女性发生性行为的年轻男性非问题饮酒者的社区样本进行了一项组间和组内实验。在评估清醒状态下对TPB-CUR结构(如态度、规范、自我效能感、控制感和意图)的认可后,对受试者进行实验性的饮料条件操纵,并重新评估对TPB-CUR结构的认可。

结果

分析包括重复测量多变量方差分析(MANOVA),以饮料条件(无酒精与有酒精)作为组间因素,时间(饮用饮料前与饮用饮料后)作为组内因素。在组间方面,与清醒的参与者相比,醉酒的参与者报告的CUR意图明显更强,CUR态度和规范认知更积极,CUR自我效能感更高。CUR意图、态度、规范认知和自我效能感在组内有显著变化。未发现CUR控制在组间和组内的效应。一项探索性多组路径分析表明,酒精组和无酒精组的TPB-CUR结构之间的关系相似。

结论

研究结果表明,酒精中毒增加了男性的CUR意图和自我效能感,并导致更积极的CUR态度和规范,但对CUR控制没有影响。未来的研究应探讨中毒对与其他性风险行为相关的TPB结构是否有类似影响。

相似文献

1
Men's condom use resistance: Alcohol effects on theory of planned behavior constructs.
Health Psychol. 2016 Feb;35(2):178-86. doi: 10.1037/hea0000269. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
3
Effects of Alcohol, Condom Request Style, and State Anger on Men's Condom Use Resistance.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jul;81(4):454-461. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.454.
5
Alcohol intoxication, condom use rationale, and men's coercive condom use resistance: The role of past unintended partner pregnancy.
Psychol Addict Behav. 2024 Mar;38(2):173-184. doi: 10.1037/adb0000956. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
6
Depressive Symptoms, Acute Alcohol Intoxication, and Risk Rationale Effects on Men's Condom Use Resistance.
J Sex Res. 2017 Jul-Aug;54(6):764-775. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2016.1217500. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
8
Comparing theory-based condom interventions: health belief model versus theory of planned behavior.
Health Psychol. 2014 Oct;33(10):1251-60. doi: 10.1037/a0033969. Epub 2013 Aug 26.
9
Alcohol intoxication and condom use self-efficacy effects on women's condom use intentions.
Addict Behav. 2014 Jan;39(1):153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.019. Epub 2013 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Causal Effects of Alcohol Consumption on Condom Negotiation Skills of Women with Varying Sexual Assault Histories.
AIDS Behav. 2025 Mar;29(3):896-905. doi: 10.1007/s10461-024-04573-y. Epub 2024 Dec 14.
3
The Effect of State, Trait, and Situational Factors on Young Men's Coercive Condom Use Resistance.
Psychol Men Masc. 2022 Oct;23(4):374-383. doi: 10.1037/men0000399. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
A Scoping Review of Nonconsensual Condom Removal ("Stealthing") Research.
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2024 Jan;25(1):215-230. doi: 10.1177/15248380221146802. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
5
The Roles of Emotion Regulation, Alcohol Consumption, and Women's Condom Request Style in Men's Coercive Condom Use Resistance Intentions.
J Aggress Maltreat Trauma. 2022;31(9):1187-1205. doi: 10.1080/10926771.2022.2089862. Epub 2022 Jun 17.
9
Effects of Alcohol, Condom Request Style, and State Anger on Men's Condom Use Resistance.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Jul;81(4):454-461. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.454.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of alcohol on sexual decision making: Intentions to have unprotected sex.
Psychol Health. 2008;23(8):909-34. doi: 10.1080/08870440701596551.
2
A qualitative examination of men's condom use attitudes and resistance: "it's just part of the game".
Arch Sex Behav. 2014 Apr;43(3):631-43. doi: 10.1007/s10508-013-0150-9. Epub 2013 Aug 3.
3
Young men's condom use resistance tactics: a latent profile analysis.
J Sex Res. 2014;51(4):454-65. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2013.776660. Epub 2013 Apr 2.
5
Exploring the intention-behavior relationship in the prediction of sexual risk behaviors: can it be strengthened?
J Sex Res. 2012;49(1):50-60. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2011.578220. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
6
The theory of planned behavior and binge drinking among undergraduate students: assessing the impact of habit strength.
Addict Behav. 2011 May;36(5):502-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.025. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
7
Condom use rates in a national probability sample of males and females ages 14 to 94 in the United States.
J Sex Med. 2010 Oct;7 Suppl 5:266-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.02017.x.
8
The influence of alcohol expectancies and intoxication on men's aggressive unprotected sexual intentions.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Oct;18(5):418-28. doi: 10.1037/a0020510.
9
Idiographically determined versus standard absorption periods in alcohol administration studies.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010 May;34(5):925-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01165.x. Epub 2010 Mar 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验