Kelly Helena, Downing Tim, Tuite Nina L, Smith Terry J, Kerin Michael J, Dwyer Róisín M, Clancy Eoin, Barry Thomas, Reddington Kate
Nucleic Acid Diagnostics Research Laboratory (NADRL), Microbiology, School of Natural Sciences, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
School of Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 10;10(9):e0137389. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0137389. eCollection 2015.
Micro RNAs (miRNAs) are a class of highly conserved small non-coding RNAs that play an important part in the post-transcriptional regulation of gene expression. A substantial number of miRNAs have been proposed as biomarkers for diseases. While reverse transcriptase Real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) is considered the gold standard for the evaluation and validation of miRNA biomarkers, small RNA sequencing is now routinely being adopted for the identification of dysregulated miRNAs. However, in many cases where putative miRNA biomarkers are identified using small RNA sequencing, they are not substantiated when RT-qPCR is used for validation. To date, there is a lack of consensus regarding optimal methodologies for miRNA detection, quantification and standardisation when different platform technologies are used.
In this study we present an experimental pipeline that takes into consideration sample collection, processing, enrichment, and the subsequent comparative analysis of circulating small ribonucleic acids using small RNA sequencing and RT-qPCR.
RESULTS, DISCUSSION, CONCLUSIONS: Initially, a panel of miRNAs dysregulated in circulating blood from breast cancer patients compared to healthy women were identified using small RNA sequencing. MiR-320a was identified as the most dysregulated miRNA between the two female cohorts. Total RNA and enriched small RNA populations (<30 bp) isolated from peripheral blood from the same female cohort samples were then tested for using a miR-320a RT-qPCR assay. When total RNA was analysed with this miR-320a RT-qPCR assay, a 2.3-fold decrease in expression levels was observed between blood samples from healthy controls and breast cancer patients. However, upon enrichment for the small RNA population and subsequent analysis of miR-320a using RT-qPCR, its dysregulation in breast cancer patients was more pronounced with an 8.89-fold decrease in miR-320a expression. We propose that the experimental pipeline outlined could serve as a robust approach for the identification and validation of small RNA biomarkers for disease.
微小RNA(miRNA)是一类高度保守的小非编码RNA,在基因表达的转录后调控中发挥重要作用。大量miRNA已被提议作为疾病的生物标志物。虽然逆转录实时定量聚合酶链反应(RT-qPCR)被认为是评估和验证miRNA生物标志物的金标准,但小RNA测序目前已被常规用于鉴定失调的miRNA。然而,在许多使用小RNA测序鉴定假定的miRNA生物标志物的情况下,当使用RT-qPCR进行验证时,这些标志物并未得到证实。迄今为止,在使用不同平台技术进行miRNA检测、定量和标准化的最佳方法方面缺乏共识。
在本研究中,我们提出了一个实验流程,该流程考虑了样本采集、处理、富集以及随后使用小RNA测序和RT-qPCR对循环小核糖核酸进行的比较分析。
结果、讨论、结论:最初,使用小RNA测序鉴定了一组与健康女性相比在乳腺癌患者循环血液中失调的miRNA。MiR-320a被确定为两个女性队列之间失调最严重的miRNA。然后,使用miR-320a RT-qPCR检测法对从同一女性队列样本的外周血中分离的总RNA和富集的小RNA群体(<30 bp)进行检测。当使用这种miR-320a RT-qPCR检测法分析总RNA时,在健康对照和乳腺癌患者的血液样本之间观察到表达水平下降了2.3倍。然而,在富集小RNA群体并随后使用RT-qPCR分析miR-320a后,其在乳腺癌患者中的失调更为明显,miR-320a表达下降了8.89倍。我们认为,所概述的实验流程可以作为一种可靠的方法来鉴定和验证疾病的小RNA生物标志物。