Chang Fong-Shue, Tseng Yao-Ting, Hsu Pi-Shan, Chen Chaur-Dong, Lian Ie-Bin, Chao Day-Yu
Graduate Institute of Microbiology and Public Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Graduate Institute of Statistics and Information Science, National Changhua University of Education, Changhua, Taiwan.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 14;9(9):e0004043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004043. eCollection 2015.
Despite dengue dynamics being driven by complex interactions between human hosts, mosquito vectors and viruses that are influenced by climate factors, an operational model that will enable health authorities to anticipate the outbreak risk in a dengue non-endemic area has not been developed. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the temporal relationship between meteorological variables, entomological surveillance indices and confirmed dengue cases; and to establish the threshold for entomological surveillance indices including three mosquito larval indices [Breteau (BI), Container (CI) and House indices (HI)] and one adult index (AI) as an early warning tool for dengue epidemic.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Epidemiological, entomological and meteorological data were analyzed from 2005 to 2012 in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan. The successive waves of dengue outbreaks with different magnitudes were recorded in Kaohsiung City, and involved a dominant serotype during each epidemic. The annual indigenous dengue cases usually started from May to June and reached a peak in October to November. Vector data from 2005-2012 showed that the peak of the adult mosquito population was followed by a peak in the corresponding dengue activity with a lag period of 1-2 months. Therefore, we focused the analysis on the data from May to December and the high risk district, where the inspection of the immature and mature mosquitoes was carried out on a weekly basis and about 97.9% dengue cases occurred. The two-stage model was utilized here to estimate the risk and time-lag effect of annual dengue outbreaks in Taiwan. First, Poisson regression was used to select the optimal subset of variables and time-lags for predicting the number of dengue cases, and the final results of the multivariate analysis were selected based on the smallest AIC value. Next, each vector index models with selected variables were subjected to multiple logistic regression models to examine the accuracy of predicting the occurrence of dengue cases. The results suggested that Model-AI, BI, CI and HI predicted the occurrence of dengue cases with 83.8, 87.8, 88.3 and 88.4% accuracy, respectively. The predicting threshold based on individual Model-AI, BI, CI and HI was 0.97, 1.16, 1.79 and 0.997, respectively.
CONCLUSION/SIGNIFICANCE: There was little evidence of quantifiable association among vector indices, meteorological factors and dengue transmission that could reliably be used for outbreak prediction. Our study here provided the proof-of-concept of how to search for the optimal model and determine the threshold for dengue epidemics. Since those factors used for prediction varied, depending on the ecology and herd immunity level under different geological areas, different thresholds may be developed for different countries using a similar structure of the two-stage model.
尽管登革热的传播动态受到人类宿主、蚊媒和病毒之间复杂相互作用的驱动,而这些相互作用又受到气候因素的影响,但尚未开发出一种可使卫生当局预测登革热非流行地区爆发风险的实用模型。本研究的目的是评估气象变量、昆虫学监测指标与确诊登革热病例之间的时间关系;并确定昆虫学监测指标的阈值,包括三个蚊虫幼虫指标[布雷图指数(BI)、容器指数(CI)和房屋指数(HI)]和一个成虫指数(AI),作为登革热疫情的早期预警工具。
方法/主要发现:对2005年至2012年台湾高雄市的流行病学、昆虫学和气象数据进行了分析。高雄市记录到了不同规模的连续几波登革热疫情,每次疫情都涉及一种优势血清型。每年的本地登革热病例通常从5月至6月开始,10月至11月达到高峰。2005 - 2012年的病媒数据显示,成蚊数量高峰之后,相应的登革热活动高峰会有1 - 2个月的滞后。因此,我们将分析重点放在5月至12月的数据以及高风险地区,该地区每周对未成熟和成熟蚊虫进行检查,约97.9%的登革热病例在此发生。这里使用两阶段模型来估计台湾年度登革热疫情的风险和时间滞后效应。首先,使用泊松回归选择预测登革热病例数的最佳变量子集和时间滞后,基于最小AIC值选择多变量分析的最终结果。接下来,将具有选定变量的每个病媒指数模型纳入多元逻辑回归模型,以检验预测登革热病例发生的准确性。结果表明,模型 - AI、BI、CI和HI预测登革热病例发生的准确率分别为83.8%、87.8%、88.3%和88.4%。基于单个模型 - AI、BI、CI和HI的预测阈值分别为0.97、1.16、1.79和0.997。
结论/意义:几乎没有证据表明病媒指数、气象因素与登革热传播之间存在可量化的关联从而能可靠地用于疫情预测。我们的研究提供了如何寻找最佳模型以及确定登革热疫情阈值的概念验证。由于用于预测的这些因素因不同地理区域的生态和群体免疫水平而异,使用类似结构的两阶段模型可为不同国家制定不同的阈值。