Lee Sang, Lee Myung J, Kim Byoung W, Gilman Jodi M, Kuster John K, Blood Anne J, Kuhnen Camelia M, Breiter Hans C
Warren Wright Adolescent Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States of America; Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, United States of America; Massachusetts General Hospital and Northwestern University Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood Disorders.
Laboratory of Neuroimaging and Genetics, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) and Harvard Medical School (HMS), Boston, MA, United States of America; Massachusetts General Hospital and Northwestern University Phenotype Genotype Project in Addiction and Mood Disorders.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 22;10(9):e0135216. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135216. eCollection 2015.
Individuals tend to give losses approximately 2-fold the weight that they give gains. Such approximations of loss aversion (LA) are almost always measured in the stimulus domain of money, rather than objects or pictures. Recent work on preference-based decision-making with a schedule-less keypress task (relative preference theory, RPT) has provided a mathematical formulation for LA similar to that in prospect theory (PT), but makes no parametric assumptions in the computation of LA, uses a variable tied to communication theory (i.e., the Shannon entropy or information), and works readily with non-monetary stimuli. We evaluated if these distinct frameworks described similar LA in healthy subjects, and found that LA during the anticipation phase of the PT-based task correlated significantly with LA related to the RPT-based task. Given the ease with which non-monetary stimuli can be used on the Internet, or in animal studies, these findings open an extensive range of applications for the study of loss aversion. Furthermore, the emergence of methodology that can be used to measure preference for both social stimuli and money brings a common framework to the evaluation of preference in both social psychology and behavioral economics.
人们往往赋予损失的权重约为收益的两倍。这种损失厌恶(LA)的近似值几乎总是在金钱的刺激领域中衡量,而非物体或图片。最近关于基于无时间表按键任务的偏好决策(相对偏好理论,RPT)的研究为LA提供了一种类似于前景理论(PT)的数学公式,但在LA的计算中不做参数假设,使用与通信理论相关的变量(即香农熵或信息),并且很容易处理非货币刺激。我们评估了这些不同的框架在健康受试者中是否描述了相似的LA,结果发现基于PT的任务预期阶段的LA与基于RPT的任务相关的LA显著相关。鉴于在互联网上或动物研究中可以轻松使用非货币刺激,这些发现为损失厌恶的研究开辟了广泛的应用范围。此外,可用于测量对社会刺激和金钱偏好的方法的出现,为社会心理学和行为经济学中的偏好评估带来了一个共同的框架。