Allen Norrina B, Badon Sylvia, Greenlund Kurt J, Huffman Mark, Hong Yuling, Lloyd-Jones Donald M
Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 North Lake Shore Dr., Suite 1400, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Division of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015 Sep 22;13:152. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0352-z.
This study was conducted to examine the association between ideal cardiovascular health (CVH) and health-related quality of life and health status indicators.
This cross-sectional study included adult NHANES participants from 2001 to 2010 without CVD (N = 7115). CVH was defined according to AHA definitions with poor, intermediate and ideal levels of the seven factors (diet, BMI, physical activity, smoking, blood pressure, glucose, and cholesterol) assigned scores of 0, 1, and 2, respectively. A CVH score (CVHS) was calculated as the sum of the scores from each individual health factor (range 0-14; higher score indicating greater CVH). CVHS was categorized as poor (0-7), intermediate (8-10), and ideal (11-14). Linear regression models examined the association between CVHS category with health status and number of unhealthy days per month, adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics and disability.
Among US adults 20-79 years, 14, 46 and 40% had ideal, intermediate and poor CVHS, respectively. Compared to those with poor CVH, individuals in intermediate and ideal CVH were 44 and 71% less likely to report being in fair/poor health. Participants with ideal CVH scores reported a mean of 2.4 fewer unhealthy days over the past month, including one less day in which their physical health was not good and two fewer days in which their mental health was not good.
Ideal CVH is associated with greater overall health status and fewer physically and mentally unhealthy days.
本研究旨在探讨理想心血管健康(CVH)与健康相关生活质量及健康状况指标之间的关联。
这项横断面研究纳入了2001年至2010年无心血管疾病(CVD)的美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)成年参与者(N = 7115)。根据美国心脏协会(AHA)的定义确定CVH,七个因素(饮食、体重指数、身体活动、吸烟、血压、血糖和胆固醇)的差、中等和理想水平分别计分为0、1和2。计算CVH得分(CVHS),即各个健康因素得分之和(范围为0 - 14;得分越高表明CVH越好)。CVHS分为差(0 - 7)、中等(8 - 10)和理想(11 - 14)。线性回归模型检验了CVHS类别与健康状况及每月不健康天数之间的关联,并对社会人口学特征和残疾情况进行了调整。
在20 - 79岁的美国成年人中,分别有14%、46%和40%的人具有理想、中等和较差的CVHS。与CVH较差的人相比,CVH处于中等和理想水平的人报告健康状况为“一般/差”的可能性分别降低了44%和71%。CVH得分理想的参与者报告在过去一个月中平均不健康天数少2.4天,包括身体健康不佳的天数少1天,心理健康不佳的天数少2天。
理想的CVH与更好的整体健康状况以及更少的身心不健康天数相关。