Suppr超能文献

细菌气球上的卡通画:科学家对合成生物学普及的看法。

Cartoons on bacterial balloons: scientists' opinion on the popularization of synthetic biology.

作者信息

Domínguez Martí, Mateu Anna, Torgersen Helge, Porcar Manuel

机构信息

Language Theory and Communication Sciences Department, University of Valencia, Blasco Ibáñez 32, 46008 Valencia, Spain ; The Two Cultures Observatory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

The Two Cultures Observatory, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.

出版信息

Syst Synth Biol. 2014 Dec;8(4):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s11693-014-9155-5. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

Abstract

How do scientists perceive the media coverage of synthetic biology (SB)? In this paper, we approach this question by studying a set of cartoons devoted to SB. Based on a categorization of the cartoons into five large thematic groups an international survey was carried out to assess the opinion of SB research groups on science communication with regard to the public image of their discipline. The 101 responses obtained indicate that in general, their perception of the communication is not negative, although many respondents raised concerns on the media's inclination to sensationalism and over-simplification. However, the results also suggest that (in the light of the unfortunate experiences with GMO communication) scientists should think twice before proposing metaphorical interpretations of their research.

摘要

科学家如何看待合成生物学(SB)的媒体报道?在本文中,我们通过研究一组关于合成生物学的漫画来探讨这个问题。基于将漫画分为五个大主题组的分类,我们进行了一项国际调查,以评估合成生物学研究团队对于其学科公众形象的科学传播方面的看法。所获得的101份回复表明,总体而言,他们对传播的看法并非负面,尽管许多受访者对媒体倾向于耸人听闻和过度简化表示担忧。然而,结果也表明(鉴于转基因生物传播方面的不幸经历)科学家在对其研究提出隐喻性解释之前应三思。

相似文献

1
Cartoons on bacterial balloons: scientists' opinion on the popularization of synthetic biology.
Syst Synth Biol. 2014 Dec;8(4):321-8. doi: 10.1007/s11693-014-9155-5. Epub 2014 Oct 8.
2
Scientists' opinions and attitudes towards citizens' understanding of science and their role in public engagement activities.
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 13;14(11):e0224262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224262. eCollection 2019.
3
Safe and Sound? Scientists' Understandings of Public Engagement in Emerging Biotechnologies.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145033. eCollection 2015.
4
"The chilling effect": Medical scientists' responses to audience feedback on their media appearances during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Public Underst Sci. 2023 Jul;32(5):546-560. doi: 10.1177/09636625221146749. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
5
An emerging form of public engagement with science: Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions on Reddit r/science.
PLoS One. 2019 May 15;14(5):e0216789. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216789. eCollection 2019.
6
A comparison between scientists' and communication scholars' views about scientists' public engagement activities.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Jan;28(1):101-118. doi: 10.1177/0963662518797002. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Scientists' deficit perception of the public impedes their behavioral intentions to correct misinformation.
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287870. eCollection 2023.
8
Communicating science in public controversies: Strategic considerations of the German climate scientists.
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):61-70. doi: 10.1177/0963662514521542. Epub 2014 Feb 27.
9
Scientists' Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 25;11(2):e0148867. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148867. eCollection 2016.
10
Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists' definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0277677. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277677. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Creating life and the media: translations and echoes.
Life Sci Soc Policy. 2018 Aug 20;14(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40504-018-0087-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Synthetic biology: taking a look at a field in the making.
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Feb;21(2):130-133. doi: 10.1177/0963662511426381.
2
Different ways of problematising biotechnology--and what it means for technology governance.
Public Underst Sci. 2015 Jul;24(5):516-32. doi: 10.1177/0963662514539074. Epub 2014 Jun 24.
3
Time to settle the synthetic controversy.
Nature. 2014 May 8;509(7499):135. doi: 10.1038/509135a.
4
Are we doing synthetic biology?
Syst Synth Biol. 2012 Dec;6(3-4):79-83. doi: 10.1007/s11693-012-9101-3. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
5
Playing God or just unnatural? Religious beliefs and approval of synthetic biology.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Oct;22(7):869-85. doi: 10.1177/0963662512445011. Epub 2012 May 24.
6
Spanish Darwinian iconography: Darwin and evolutionism portrayed in Spanish press cartoons.
Public Underst Sci. 2013 Nov;22(8):999-1010. doi: 10.1177/0963662512442050. Epub 2012 May 17.
7
Frames and comparators: How might a debate on synthetic biology evolve?
Futures. 2013 Apr;48(100):44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2013.02.002.
8
Commentary: Looking for conflict and finding none?
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Feb;21(2):188-94. doi: 10.1177/0963662511434433.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验