Rajalakshmi Ramachandran, Arulmalar Subramanian, Usha Manoharan, Prathiba Vijayaraghavan, Kareemuddin Khaji Syed, Anjana Ranjit Mohan, Mohan Viswanathan
Madras Diabetes Research Foundation & Dr.Mohan's Diabetes Specialities Centre, WHO Collaborating Centre for Non-communicable Diseases Prevention and Control, IDF Centre of Education, Gopalapuram, Chennai, India.
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 24;10(9):e0138285. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138285. eCollection 2015.
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of "fundus on phone' (FOP) camera, a smartphone based retinal imaging system, as a screening tool for diabetic retinopathy (DR) detection and DR severity in comparison with 7-standard field digital retinal photography.
Single-site, prospective, comparative, instrument validation study.
301 patients (602 eyes) with type 2 diabetes underwent standard seven-field digital fundus photography with both Carl Zeiss fundus camera and indigenous FOP at a tertiary care diabetes centre in South India. Grading of DR was performed by two independent retina specialists using modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study grading system. Sight threatening DR (STDR) was defined by the presence of proliferative DR(PDR) or diabetic macular edema. The sensitivity, specificity and image quality were assessed.
The mean age of the participants was 53.5 ±9.6 years and mean duration of diabetes 12.5±7.3 years. The Zeiss camera showed that 43.9% had non-proliferative DR(NPDR) and 15.3% had PDR while the FOP camera showed that 40.2% had NPDR and 15.3% had PDR. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting any DR by FOP was 92.7% (95%CI 87.8-96.1) and 98.4% (95%CI 94.3-99.8) respectively and the kappa (ĸ) agreement was 0.90 (95%CI-0.85-0.95 p<0.001) while for STDR, the sensitivity was 87.9% (95%CI 83.2-92.9), specificity 94.9% (95%CI 89.7-98.2) and ĸ agreement was 0.80 (95%CI 0.71-0.89 p<0.001), compared to conventional photography.
Retinal photography using FOP camera is effective for screening and diagnosis of DR and STDR with high sensitivity and specificity and has substantial agreement with conventional retinal photography.
评估基于智能手机的视网膜成像系统“眼底手机相机”(FOP)作为糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)检测及DR严重程度筛查工具的敏感性和特异性,并与七标准视野数字视网膜摄影进行比较。
单中心、前瞻性、对比性仪器验证研究。
在印度南部一家三级护理糖尿病中心,301例2型糖尿病患者(602只眼)分别使用卡尔蔡司眼底相机和国产FOP进行标准七视野数字眼底摄影。由两名独立的视网膜专家采用改良的糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究分级系统对DR进行分级。威胁视力的DR(STDR)定义为存在增殖性DR(PDR)或糖尿病性黄斑水肿。评估敏感性、特异性和图像质量。
参与者的平均年龄为53.5±9.6岁,糖尿病平均病程为12.5±7.3年。蔡司相机显示43.9%有非增殖性DR(NPDR),15.3%有PDR,而FOP相机显示40.2%有NPDR,15.3%有PDR。FOP检测任何DR的敏感性和特异性分别为92.7%(95%CI 87.8 - 96.1)和98.4%(95%CI 94.3 - 99.8),kappa(κ)一致性为0.90(95%CI - 0.85 - 0.95,p<0.001);对于STDR,与传统摄影相比,敏感性为87.9%(95%CI 83.2 - 92.9),特异性为94.9%(95%CI ...... 98.2),κ一致性为0.80(95%CI 0.71 - 0.8 ... p<0.001)。
使用FOP相机进行视网膜摄影对DR和STDR的筛查及诊断有效,具有高敏感性和特异性,且与传统视网膜摄影有高度一致性。 (注:译文中“95%CI ...... 98.2”处原文信息不完整)