Noureddine Yacine, Bitz Andreas K, Ladd Mark E, Thürling Markus, Ladd Susanne C, Schaefers Gregor, Kraff Oliver
Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
MR:comp GmbH, MR Safety Testing Laboratory, Gelsenkirchen, Germany.
MAGMA. 2015 Dec;28(6):577-90. doi: 10.1007/s10334-015-0499-y. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
Over the last decade, the number of clinical MRI studies at 7 T has increased dramatically. Since only limited information about the safety of implants/tattoos is available at 7 T, many centers either conservatively exclude all subjects with implants/tattoos or have started to perform dedicated tests for selected implants. This work presents our experience in imaging volunteers with implants/tattoos at 7 T over the last seven and a half years.
1796 questionnaires were analyzed retrospectively to identify subjects with implants/tattoos imaged at 7 T. For a total of 230 subjects, the type of local transmit/receive RF coil used for examination, imaging sequences, acquisition time, and the type of implants/tattoos and their location with respect to the field of view were documented. These subjects had undergone examination after careful consideration by an internal safety panel consisting of three experts in MR safety and physics.
None of the subjects reported sensations of heat or force before, during, or after the examination. None expressed any discomfort related to implants/tattoos. Artifacts were reported in 52% of subjects with dental implants; all artifacts were restricted to the mouth area and did not affect image quality in the brain parenchyma.
Our initial experience at 7 T indicates that a strict rejection of subjects with tattoos and/or implants is not justified. Imaging can be conditionally performed in carefully selected subjects after collection of substantial safety information and evaluation of the detailed exposure scenario (RF coil/type and position of implant). Among the assessed subjects with tattoos, no side effects from the exposure to 7 T MRI were reported.
在过去十年中,7T临床磁共振成像(MRI)研究的数量急剧增加。由于关于7T时植入物/纹身安全性的信息有限,许多中心要么保守地排除所有有植入物/纹身的受试者,要么开始对选定的植入物进行专门测试。本文介绍了我们在过去七年半中对有植入物/纹身的志愿者进行7T成像的经验。
回顾性分析1796份问卷,以确定在7T下成像的有植入物/纹身的受试者。对于总共230名受试者,记录了用于检查的局部发射/接收射频线圈类型、成像序列、采集时间,以及植入物/纹身的类型及其相对于视野的位置。这些受试者在由三名MR安全和物理专家组成的内部安全小组仔细考虑后接受了检查。
所有受试者在检查前、检查期间或检查后均未报告有热感或力感。没有人表示与植入物/纹身有关的任何不适。在有牙种植体的受试者中,52%报告有伪影;所有伪影都局限于口腔区域,不影响脑实质的图像质量。
我们在7T的初步经验表明,严格拒绝有纹身和/或植入物的受试者是不合理的。在收集大量安全信息并评估详细的暴露情况(射频线圈/植入物的类型和位置)后,可以有条件地对精心挑选的受试者进行成像。在评估的有纹身的受试者中,未报告7T MRI暴露的任何副作用。