• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维腹腔镜(3D-LC)与小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)的前瞻性随机研究。

Three-dimensional Laparoscopy (3D-LC) Minilaparotomy (MC) in Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland

School of Medicine, Kuopio University Hospital (KUH) and University of Eastern Finland (UEF), Kuopio, Finland.

出版信息

In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2835-2839. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13022.

DOI:10.21873/invivo.13022
PMID:36309399
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9677764/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIM: Three-dimensional laparoscopy (3D-Lap) is a recent innovation in surgery. The 3D-Lap is rarely used in cholecystectomy (3D-LC) and there are no prospective studies assessing advantages and disadvantages of 3D-LC versus minilaparotomy (MC) in cholecystectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical study conducted in the Kuopio University Hospital, including 200 patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who were randomized into 3D-LC (n=112) or MC (n=88) groups. The numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score and number of analgesic doses (NAD) following surgery were documented.

RESULTS

Similar low postoperative pain scores were reported in the 3D-LC and MC groups during the first hours following surgery, although the 3D-LC patients reported lower NRS pain score (p<0.05) one hour postoperatively. Interestingly, the 3D-LC patients showed significantly less pain 24 hours following surgery, the mean of NRS of 0-10 score at rest being 1.2 in the 3D-LC group versus 2.2 in the MC group (p<0.001), and the pain at the quick movement/coughing, the mean NRS being 2.9 in the 3D-LC group versus 3.6 in the MC group (p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

The 3D-LC patients reported significantly lower pain scores 24 hours postoperatively than MC patients. However, the patient experience of pain depends on many factors and our results suggest that both 3D-LC and MC are safe and efficient techniques for cholecystectomy.

摘要

背景/目的:三维腹腔镜(3D-Lap)是手术领域的一项新创新。3D-Lap 在胆囊切除术中很少使用,也没有前瞻性研究评估 3D-LC 与小切口(MC)在胆囊切除术中的优缺点。

患者和方法

这是在库奥皮奥大学医院进行的一项前瞻性临床研究,包括 200 例有症状的胆石症患者,他们随机分为 3D-LC(n=112)或 MC(n=88)组。记录手术后的数字评分量表(NRS)疼痛评分和止痛药剂量(NAD)数量。

结果

尽管 3D-LC 患者术后一小时的 NRS 疼痛评分较低(p<0.05),但在手术后的头几个小时,3D-LC 和 MC 组报告的术后疼痛评分相似。有趣的是,3D-LC 患者在手术后 24 小时时疼痛明显减轻,3D-LC 组的 NRS 评分在休息时为 0-10 的平均值为 1.2,而 MC 组为 2.2(p<0.001),在快速移动/咳嗽时的疼痛,NRS 的平均值为 2.9 在 3D-LC 组,而在 MC 组为 3.6(p=0.05)。

结论

3D-LC 患者术后 24 小时的疼痛评分明显低于 MC 患者。然而,患者的疼痛体验取决于许多因素,我们的结果表明,3D-LC 和 MC 都是安全有效的胆囊切除术技术。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional Laparoscopy (3D-LC) Minilaparotomy (MC) in Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.三维腹腔镜(3D-LC)与小切口开腹胆囊切除术(MC)的前瞻性随机研究。
In Vivo. 2022 Nov-Dec;36(6):2835-2839. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13022.
2
A randomized multicenter study of minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection in both groups.一项关于小切口胆囊切除术与两组均采用超声刀分离的腹腔镜胆囊切除术的随机多中心研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Mar;51(3):354-9. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1091496. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
3
First RAND-36-Item Health Survey in Three-dimensional Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.首次三维腹腔镜胆囊切除术 RAND-36 项健康调查:一项前瞻性随机研究。
In Vivo. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):1192-1197. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13195.
4
The plasma 8-OHdG levels and oxidative stress following cholecystectomy: a randomised multicentre study of patients with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy.胆囊切除术后的血浆8-羟基脱氧鸟苷水平与氧化应激:小切口胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的随机多中心研究
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec;51(12):1507-1511. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1208270. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
5
A prospective, randomized multicenter study comparing conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection as day surgery procedure--1-year outcome.一项前瞻性、随机多中心研究,比较传统腹腔镜胆囊切除术与采用超声解剖的小切口开腹胆囊切除术作为日间手术的疗效——1年随访结果
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov;49(11):1336-42. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.958095. Epub 2014 Sep 26.
6
Ten-year outcome after minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial.小切口与腹腔镜胆囊切除术 10 年结果比较:前瞻性随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2512-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2770-x. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
7
Inflammatory response to surgical trauma in patients with minilaparotomy cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised multicentre study.小切口胆囊切除术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者对手术创伤的炎症反应:一项随机多中心研究。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(6):739-44. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1129436. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus mini-laparotomy cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, single-blind study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与小切口开腹胆囊切除术:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):741-9. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200112000-00005.
9
Feasibility of minilaparotomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for day surgery: a prospective randomised study.迷你腹腔镜与腹腔镜胆囊切除术用于日间手术的可行性:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Scand J Surg. 2010;99(3):132-6. doi: 10.1177/145749691009900306.
10
Cholecystectomy: comparison of minilaparotomy and laparoscopy.胆囊切除术:小切口开腹手术与腹腔镜手术的比较
Int Surg. 1995 Apr-Jun;80(2):99-101.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective study of 3D laparoscopy and 2D laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) for unilateral inguinal hernia in elderly patients.回顾性研究 3D 腹腔镜与 2D 腹腔镜在老年单侧腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)中的应用。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2593-2601. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01923-2. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
2
Patient-reported Outcome Measure (PROM) Rand-36-item Health Survey for Gallstone Disease Patients Five Years Following Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study.患者报告结局测量(PROM)随机 36 项健康调查在胆石病患者手术后五年:一项前瞻性随机研究。
In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1213-1219. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13557.
3
First RAND-36-Item Health Survey in Three-dimensional Laparoscopy Cholecystectomy: A Prospective Randomized Study.首次三维腹腔镜胆囊切除术 RAND-36 项健康调查:一项前瞻性随机研究。
In Vivo. 2023 May-Jun;37(3):1192-1197. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13195.

本文引用的文献

1
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study.三维与二维高清腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):4857-4865. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07266-z. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
2
RAND-36-Item Health Survey: A Comprehensive Test for Long-term Outcome and Health Status Following Surgery.兰德36项健康调查:手术长期结果和健康状况的综合测试。
Anticancer Res. 2019 Jun;39(6):2927-2933. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13422.
3
Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional high-definition laparoscopy in cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study.三维高清与二维高清腹腔镜胆囊切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3725-3731. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06666-5. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
4
Cholecystectomy Patients with High Plasma Level of Catalase Have Significantly Lower Analgesia Requirement: A Prospective Study of Two Different Cholecystectomy Techniques with Special Reference to Patients with Cancer.过氧化氢酶血浆水平高的胆囊切除术患者镇痛需求显著降低:两种不同胆囊切除术技术的前瞻性研究,特别涉及癌症患者。
Anticancer Res. 2018 Sep;38(9):5417-5422. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12872.
5
Two-Dimensional Versus Three-Dimensional Laparoscopic Systems in Urology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.二维与三维腹腔镜系统在泌尿外科中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endourol. 2018 Sep 12;32(9):781-790. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0411.
6
Gallstone Patients with Enhanced Oxidative Stress Biomarker Superoxide Dismutase (SOD1) Plasma Levels Have Significantly Lower Number of Postoperative Analgesic Oxycodone Doses: A Prospective Study with Special Reference to Cancer Patients.氧化应激生物标志物超氧化物歧化酶(SOD1)血浆水平升高的胆结石患者术后镇痛用羟考酮剂量显著减少:一项特别针对癌症患者的前瞻性研究。
Anticancer Res. 2018 Jun;38(6):3573-3578. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12630.
7
3D Vision Provides Shorter Operative Time and More Accurate Intraoperative Surgical Performance in Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair Compared With 2D Vision.与二维视觉相比,三维视觉在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中可缩短手术时间并提高术中手术操作的准确性。
Surg Innov. 2017 Apr;24(2):155-161. doi: 10.1177/1553350616687434. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
8
3D vs. 2D imaging in laparoscopic surgery-an advantage? Results of standardised black box training in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中的3D与2D成像——一种优势?腹腔镜手术标准化黑箱训练的结果
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Feb;402(1):167-171. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1526-9. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
9
Three-Dimensional (3D) Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: a Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.三维(3D)与二维(2D)腹腔镜减重手术:一项单术者前瞻性随机对照研究。
Obes Surg. 2015 Nov;25(11):2120-4. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1674-y.
10
The effects of absence of stereopsis on performance of a simulated surgical task in two-dimensional and three-dimensional viewing conditions.在二维和三维观察条件下,立体视缺失对模拟手术任务操作的影响。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;99(2):240-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2013-304517. Epub 2014 Sep 3.