• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文本衔接自动分析工具(TAACO):局部、全局及文本衔接的自动评估

The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion.

作者信息

Crossley Scott A, Kyle Kristopher, McNamara Danielle S

机构信息

Department of Linguistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Learning Sciences Institute/Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1227-1237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7
PMID:26416138
Abstract

This study introduces the Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion (TAACO), a freely available text analysis tool that is easy to use, works on most operating systems (Windows, Mac, and Linux), is housed on a user's hard drive (rather than having an Internet interface), allows for the batch processing of text files, and incorporates over 150 classic and recently developed indices related to text cohesion. The study validates TAACO by investigating how its indices related to local, global, and overall text cohesion can predict expert judgments of text coherence and essay quality. The findings of this study provide predictive validation of TAACO and support the notion that expert judgments of text coherence and quality are either negatively correlated or not predicted by local and overall text cohesion indices, but are positively predicted by global indices of cohesion. Combined, these findings provide supporting evidence that coherence for expert raters is a property of global cohesion and not of local cohesion, and that expert ratings of text quality are positively related to global cohesion.

摘要

本研究介绍了连贯自动分析工具(TAACO),这是一款免费的文本分析工具,易于使用,适用于大多数操作系统(Windows、Mac和Linux),安装在用户硬盘上(而非具有网络接口),允许对文本文件进行批量处理,并纳入了150多个与文本连贯相关的经典和最新开发的指标。该研究通过调查TAACO与局部、全局和整体文本连贯相关的指标如何预测文本连贯性和文章质量的专家判断,来验证TAACO。本研究的结果为TAACO提供了预测性验证,并支持这样一种观点,即文本连贯性和质量的专家判断与局部和整体文本连贯指标呈负相关或无法由其预测,但与连贯的全局指标呈正相关。综合来看,这些结果提供了支持性证据,表明对于专家评分者而言,连贯性是全局连贯的属性而非局部连贯的属性,并且文本质量的专家评分与全局连贯呈正相关。

相似文献

1
The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion.文本衔接自动分析工具(TAACO):局部、全局及文本衔接的自动评估
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1227-1237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7.
2
The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.自动分析粘着度工具 2.0:整合语义相似度和文本重叠。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):14-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4.
3
Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis.情感分析和社会认知引擎(SEANCE):一种用于情感、社会认知和社会秩序分析的自动工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):803-821. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z.
4
The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0.词汇复杂度自动分析工具(TAALES):版本 2.0。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1030-1046. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4.
5
Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system.智能写作策略辅导系统中的自然语言处理。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):499-515. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1.
6
Text cohesion and metacomprehension: immediate and delayed judgments.
Mem Cognit. 2004 Dec;32(8):1238-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03206315.
7
Using temporal cohesion to predict temporal coherence in narrative and expository texts.利用时间连贯性来预测叙事文本和说明性文本中的时间一致性。
Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):212-23. doi: 10.3758/bf03193150.
8
Cohesion network analysis of CSCL participation.CSCL 参与的内聚网络分析。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Apr;50(2):604-619. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0888-4.
9
Is a Long Essay Always a Good Essay? The Effect of Text Length on Writing Assessment.长篇文章就一定是好文章吗?文本长度对写作评估的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:562462. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.562462. eCollection 2020.
10
Influence of text cohesion on the persuasive power of expository text.篇章衔接对说明文说服力的影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2011 Jun;52(3):201-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2010.00863.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging computational linguistics and machine learning for detection of ultra-high risk of mental health disorders in youths.利用计算语言学和机器学习检测青少年心理健康障碍的超高风险。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 15;11(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00649-3.
2
Global measures of syntactic and lexical complexity are not strong predictors of eye-movement patterns in sentence and passage reading.句法和词汇复杂度的整体测量并非句子和篇章阅读中眼动模式的有力预测指标。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2025 Feb 21:17470218251317372. doi: 10.1177/17470218251317372.
3
Investigating response behavior through TF-IDF and Word2vec text analysis: A case study of PISA 2012 problem-solving process data.
通过TF-IDF和Word2vec文本分析研究反应行为:以2012年国际学生评估项目(PISA)解决问题过程数据为例
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e35945. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35945. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
4
Clinical efficacy of pre-trained large language models through the lens of aphasia.从失语症的角度看预先训练的大型语言模型的临床疗效。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 6;14(1):15573. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66576-y.
5
Speech based natural language profile before, during and after the onset of psychosis: A cluster analysis.精神病发作前、发作期间及发作后的基于语音的自然语言特征:一项聚类分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2025 Mar;151(3):332-347. doi: 10.1111/acps.13685. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
6
The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing.同伴互评反馈在大学英语写作中的作用与特点
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;13:1070618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070618. eCollection 2022.
7
LATIC-A linguistic analyzer for text and item characteristics.LATIC-用于文本和项目特征的语言分析器。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 3;17(11):e0277250. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277250. eCollection 2022.
8
Divergent semantic integration (DSI): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling.发散语义整合(DSI):通过分布语义建模从叙事中提取创造力。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Oct;55(7):3726-3759. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01986-2. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
9
It's not just a phase: Investigating text simplification in a second language from a process and product perspective.这并非只是一个阶段:从过程和结果的角度研究第二语言中的文本简化。
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Sep 12;5:983008. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.983008. eCollection 2022.
10
Validity of a Computational Linguistics-Derived Automated Health Literacy Measure Across Race/Ethnicity: Findings from The ECLIPPSE Project.基于计算语言学的自动健康素养测量方法在不同种族/民族间的有效性:来自 ECLIPPSE 项目的研究结果。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2021 May;32(2 Suppl):347-365. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2021.0067.