• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

词汇复杂度自动分析工具(TAALES):版本 2.0。

The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0.

机构信息

University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI, USA.

Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1030-1046. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4
PMID:28699123
Abstract

This study introduces the second release of the Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Lexical Sophistication (TAALES 2.0), a freely available and easy-to-use text analysis tool. TAALES 2.0 is housed on a user's hard drive (allowing for secure data processing) and is available on most operating systems (Windows, Mac, and Linux). TAALES 2.0 adds 316 indices to the original tool. These indices are related to word frequency, word range, n-gram frequency, n-gram range, n-gram strength of association, contextual distinctiveness, word recognition norms, semantic network, and word neighbors. In this study, we validated TAALES 2.0 by investigating whether its indices could be used to model both holistic scores of lexical proficiency in free writes and word choice scores in narrative essays. The results indicated that the TAALES 2.0 indices could be used to explain 58% of the variance in lexical proficiency scores and 32% of the variance in word-choice scores. Newly added TAALES 2.0 indices, including those related to n-gram association strength, word neighborhood, and word recognition norms, featured heavily in these predictor models, suggesting that TAALES 2.0 represents a substantial upgrade.

摘要

本研究介绍了词汇复杂度自动分析工具(TAALES)的第二个版本,即 TAALES 2.0。这是一个免费且易于使用的文本分析工具,可在用户的硬盘上运行(允许进行安全的数据处理),并适用于大多数操作系统(Windows、Mac 和 Linux)。TAALES 2.0 在原始工具的基础上增加了 316 个指标。这些指标与词频、词域、n 元组频率、n 元组范围、n 元组关联强度、语境独特性、词识别规范、语义网络和词邻接有关。在本研究中,我们通过研究其指标是否可用于模拟自由写作中的词汇熟练程度综合得分和记叙文的选词得分,来验证 TAALES 2.0。结果表明,TAALES 2.0 指数可用于解释词汇熟练程度得分 58%的方差和选词得分 32%的方差。新增加的 TAALES 2.0 指数,包括与 n 元组关联强度、词邻接和词识别规范相关的指数,在这些预测模型中占据重要地位,表明 TAALES 2.0 是一个重大升级。

相似文献

1
The tool for the automatic analysis of lexical sophistication (TAALES): version 2.0.词汇复杂度自动分析工具(TAALES):版本 2.0。
Behav Res Methods. 2018 Jun;50(3):1030-1046. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0924-4.
2
The Tool for the Automatic Analysis of Cohesion 2.0: Integrating semantic similarity and text overlap.自动分析粘着度工具 2.0:整合语义相似度和文本重叠。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Feb;51(1):14-27. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1142-4.
3
Sentiment Analysis and Social Cognition Engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis.情感分析和社会认知引擎(SEANCE):一种用于情感、社会认知和社会秩序分析的自动工具。
Behav Res Methods. 2017 Jun;49(3):803-821. doi: 10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z.
4
The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion.文本衔接自动分析工具(TAACO):局部、全局及文本衔接的自动评估
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Dec;48(4):1227-1237. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0651-7.
5
Sense-aware lexical sophistication indices and their relationship to second language writing quality.感知词汇复杂度指数及其与二语写作质量的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2022 Jun;54(3):1444-1460. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01675-6. Epub 2021 Aug 17.
6
Natural language processing in an intelligent writing strategy tutoring system.智能写作策略辅导系统中的自然语言处理。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):499-515. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0258-1.
7
Tool-supported Interactive Correction and Semantic Annotation of Narrative Clinical Reports.叙事性临床报告的工具支持交互式校正与语义标注
Methods Inf Med. 2017 May 18;56(3):217-229. doi: 10.3414/ME16-01-0083. Epub 2017 Apr 28.
8
Rethinking the word frequency effect: the neglected role of distributional information in lexical processing.重新思考词频效应:分布信息在词汇处理中被忽视的作用。
Lang Speech. 2001 Sep;44(Pt 3):295-323. doi: 10.1177/00238309010440030101.
9
Standard-Chinese Lexical Neighborhood Test in normal-hearing young children.正常听力幼儿的标准汉语词汇邻域测试
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Jun;75(6):774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2011.03.002. Epub 2011 Apr 1.
10
Simplifying drug package leaflets written in Spanish by using word embedding.通过词嵌入简化用西班牙语编写的药品说明书
J Biomed Semantics. 2017 Sep 29;8(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s13326-017-0156-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing fine-grained sense-aware lexical sophistication indices based on the CEFR levels of word senses.基于词元的欧洲共同语言参考标准(CEFR)等级开发细粒度的语义感知词汇复杂度指标。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 16;57(8):226. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02741-z.
2
Leveraging computational linguistics and machine learning for detection of ultra-high risk of mental health disorders in youths.利用计算语言学和机器学习检测青少年心理健康障碍的超高风险。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2025 Jul 15;11(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s41537-025-00649-3.
3
Large language models predict cognition and education close to or better than genomics or expert assessment.
大型语言模型在预测认知和教育方面的表现接近或优于基因组学或专家评估。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 3;3(1):95. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00274-x.
4
Emotional event perception is related to lexical complexity and emotion knowledge.情绪事件感知与词汇复杂度及情感知识相关。
Commun Psychol. 2023 Dec 18;1(1):45. doi: 10.1038/s44271-023-00039-4.
5
The Tool for Automatic Measurement of Morphological Information (TAMMI).形态信息自动测量工具(TAMMI)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Sep;56(6):5918-5929. doi: 10.3758/s13428-023-02324-w. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
6
Features of lexical complexity: insights from L1 and L2 speakers.词汇复杂性的特征:来自母语和非母语使用者的见解。
Front Artif Intell. 2023 Nov 30;6:1236963. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.1236963. eCollection 2023.
7
The role and features of peer assessment feedback in college English writing.同伴互评反馈在大学英语写作中的作用与特点
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;13:1070618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1070618. eCollection 2022.
8
Lexical and phraseological differences between second language written and spoken opinion responses.第二语言书面和口头观点回应中的词汇及短语差异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Mar 1;14:1068685. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1068685. eCollection 2023.
9
The effects of genre on the lexical richness of argumentative and expository writing by Chinese EFL learners.体裁对中国英语学习者议论文和说明文词汇丰富度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 10;13:1082228. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1082228. eCollection 2022.
10
Comparing product quality between translation and paraphrasing: Using NLP-assisted evaluation frameworks.比较翻译与释义之间的产品质量:使用自然语言处理辅助评估框架。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1048132. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1048132. eCollection 2022.