• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

遗传咨询患者信件可读性评估

Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters.

作者信息

Brown Emily, Skinner Megan, Ashley Stephanie, Reed Kate, Dixon Shannan DeLany

机构信息

University of Maryland Genetic Counseling Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):454-60. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0
PMID:26416185
Abstract

Patient letters are a powerful tool that genetic counselors use to communicate with their patients. Patient letters are often sent to provide information on a new diagnosis, reiterate test results, and to serve as a permanent record of the visit. Patient letters, however, are only helpful if the patients can understand them. More than 50 % of the US population reads below a 9th grade reading level and over one-third of the population has low health literacy skills. In this study we evaluate the readability of genetic counseling patient letters by assessing reading level, image use, and terminology use. One hundred forty-nine genetic counselors participated in the survey and of these, 79 submitted a sample patient letter. Analyses of the letters revealed a mean reading level of 10.93. On average, 6 genetic terms were included in each letter, and only 25 % of these terms were defined. Analyses of survey responses revealed over 75 % of the genetic counselors did not include images in their patient letters. These results indicate there is room for improvement in order to make genetic counseling patient letters more accessible to the general population.

摘要

患者信函是遗传咨询师与患者沟通的有力工具。发送患者信函通常是为了提供关于新诊断的信息、重申检测结果,并作为就诊的永久记录。然而,只有患者能够理解,患者信函才会有帮助。超过50%的美国人口阅读水平低于九年级,超过三分之一的人口健康素养技能较低。在本研究中,我们通过评估阅读水平、图像使用和术语使用来评估遗传咨询患者信函的可读性。149名遗传咨询师参与了调查,其中79人提交了一份患者信函样本。对这些信函的分析显示平均阅读水平为10.93。每封信函平均包含6个遗传学术语,其中只有25%的术语有定义。对调查回复的分析显示,超过75%的遗传咨询师在他们的患者信函中没有使用图像。这些结果表明,为了使遗传咨询患者信函更容易被普通人群理解,仍有改进的空间。

相似文献

1
Assessment of the Readability of Genetic Counseling Patient Letters.遗传咨询患者信件可读性评估
J Genet Couns. 2016 Jun;25(3):454-60. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9890-0. Epub 2015 Sep 29.
2
The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case-control Study.遗传咨询总结信的长短:一项病例对照研究
J Genet Couns. 2015 Aug;24(4):645-53. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9792-6. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
3
The Readability of Outpatient Plastic Surgery Clinic Letters: Are We Adhering to Plain English Writing Standards?门诊整形外科诊所信件的可读性:我们是否遵守了简明英语写作标准?
Plast Surg Nurs. 2021;41(1):27-33. doi: 10.1097/PSN.0000000000000356.
4
Readability of "Dear Patient" device advisory notification letters created by a device manufacturer.医疗器械制造商撰写的“Dear Patient”设备咨询通知信函的易读性。
Heart Rhythm. 2013 Apr;10(4):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.12.022. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
5
Readability of out-patient letters copied to patients: can patients understand what is written about them?复印给患者的门诊信件的可读性:患者能理解关于他们的内容吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Mar;124(3):324-7. doi: 10.1017/S0022215109991770. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
6
Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: preliminary test of a conceptual framework.评估遗传咨询对话中的口腔读写能力需求:概念框架的初步测试
Soc Sci Med. 2007 Oct;65(7):1442-57. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.033. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
7
Health literacy and the readability of written information for hormone therapies.健康素养与激素治疗相关书面信息的可读性
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 May-Jun;58(3):265-70. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12036. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
8
Mammography result notification letters: are they easy to read and understand?乳腺 X 光摄影结果通知信函:它们是否易于阅读和理解?
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011 Apr;20(4):545-51. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2330. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
9
Risk for Patient Harm in Canadian Genetic Counseling Practice: It's Time to Consider Regulation.加拿大遗传咨询实践中患者面临的伤害风险:是时候考虑进行监管了。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9983-4. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
10
An online readability analysis of pathology-related patient education articles: an opportunity for pathologists to educate patients.病理学相关患者教育文章的在线可读性分析:病理学家教育患者的契机。
Hum Pathol. 2017 Jul;65:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.04.020. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
What kind of information is requested by patients and families with genetic disorders? : The analysis of an online patient community in South Korea.患有遗传性疾病的患者及其家属需要什么样的信息?:对韩国一个在线患者社区的分析
J Community Genet. 2025 Aug 22. doi: 10.1007/s12687-025-00827-x.
2
Putting control into parents' hands: Parent experiences with a genomic results e-booklet.将控制权交予父母手中:父母使用基因组结果电子手册的体验
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70095. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70095.
3
Written communication of whole genome sequencing results in the NHS Genomic Medicine Service: a multi-centre service evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for Writing Letters to Patients.给患者写信的指南。
J Genet Couns. 2002 Oct;11(5):399-418. doi: 10.1023/A:1016841731426.
2
Family Communication and Genetic Counseling: The Case of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.家庭沟通与遗传咨询:遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌案例
J Genet Couns. 1997 Mar;6(1):45-60. doi: 10.1023/A:1025611818643.
3
The Long and Short of Genetic Counseling Summary Letters: A Case-control Study.遗传咨询总结信的长短:一项病例对照研究
NHS 基因组医学服务中全基因组测序结果的书面沟通:一项多中心服务评估。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2024 Nov;32(11):1436-1445. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01636-5. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Patient Recommendations for the Content and Design of Electronic Returns of Genetic Test Results: Interview Study Among Patients Who Accessed Their Genetic Test Results via the Internet.基因检测结果电子反馈内容与设计的患者建议:对通过互联网获取基因检测结果的患者的访谈研究
JMIRx Med. 2022 May 31;3(2):e29706. doi: 10.2196/29706.
5
Applying the framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions to increase family communication about hereditary cancer.应用开发和评估复杂干预措施的框架,以增进家庭关于遗传性癌症的沟通。
PEC Innov. 2023 Feb 4;2:100133. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100133. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.为阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆症筛查试验参与者编写书面材料
J Patient Exp. 2022 Apr 12;9:23743735221092573. doi: 10.1177/23743735221092573. eCollection 2022.
7
"You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study.“你总会记挂在心头”——德国接受遗传咨询的中危遗传性乳腺癌基因致病性变异携带者女性的感受、应对方式和支持需求:一项定性访谈研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 16;19(6):3525. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063525.
8
Do research participants share genomic screening results with family members?研究参与者是否与家庭成员分享基因组筛查结果?
J Genet Couns. 2022 Apr;31(2):447-458. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1511. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
9
Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network.了解基因组测序结果返回流程:eMERGE研究网络中参与者总结信的内容审查
J Pers Med. 2020 May 13;10(2):38. doi: 10.3390/jpm10020038.
10
Patients' willingness to reconsider cancer genetic testing after initially declining: Mention it again.患者最初拒绝癌症基因检测后重新考虑的意愿:再次提及此事。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Feb;29(1):18-24. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1174. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
J Genet Couns. 2015 Aug;24(4):645-53. doi: 10.1007/s10897-014-9792-6. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
4
What does it mean to be genomically literate?: National Human Genome Research Institute Meeting Report.具备基因组学素养意味着什么?:美国国家人类基因组研究所会议报告
Genet Med. 2013 Aug;15(8):658-63. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.14. Epub 2013 Feb 28.
5
The effect of a visual aid on the comprehension of cataract surgery in a rural, indigent South Indian population.视觉辅助工具对印度南部农村贫困人群白内障手术理解的影响。
Digit J Ophthalmol. 2011;17(3):16-22. doi: 10.5693/djo.01.2011.05.001. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead.邀请患者阅读医生的记录:一项准实验研究及前瞻性观察。
Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 2;157(7):461-70. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-157-7-201210020-00002.
7
Deficits in retention for verbally presented medical information.口头呈现的医学信息记忆缺陷。
Anesthesiology. 2012 Oct;117(4):772-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31826a4b02.
8
Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.澳大利亚关于公众对人类遗传学与健康的认知的研究。
Public Health Genomics. 2009;12(2):84-91. doi: 10.1159/000164684. Epub 2008 Oct 15.
9
Copying letters to patients with cystic fibrosis (CF): letter content and patient perceptions of benefit.给囊性纤维化(CF)患者写信:信件内容及患者对益处的认知
J Cyst Fibros. 2008 Nov;7(6):511-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2008.05.007. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
10
The rapid estimate of adult literacy in genetics (REAL-G): a means to assess literacy deficits in the context of genetics.成人遗传学素养快速评估(REAL-G):一种在遗传学背景下评估素养缺陷的方法。
Am J Med Genet A. 2008 Jan 15;146A(2):174-81. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32068.